 The assent of the States in their sovereign capacity is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final. It required not the affirmance,...  Niles' National Register - 第 67 頁1819完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Charles William Eliot - 1910 - 480 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
 | David Kemper Watson - 1910 - 960 頁
...capacity is implied in calling the Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
 | Vermont Historical Society - 1921 - 328 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people; but the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final ; that the Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation, and bound the state sovereignties;... | |
 | 1920 - 540 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1969 - 1778 頁
...capacity, is implied, in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the state sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1969 - 1080 頁
...implied, in calling a conv and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at liberty to accept or reject it ; and their act was final. It required not the affir and could not be negatived, by the state governments. The Constitution thus adopted, was of complete... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1979 - 790 頁
...constitution. In McCullough r. The State of Maryland, 4 Wheat, p. 404, Mr. Chief Justice Marshall says : "It has been said that the people had already surrendered all their powers to the state sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, their powers to the state sovereignties, and had nothing more to... | |
 | Sanford Levinson - 1995 - 344 頁
...Maryland to the Declaration, the right of rebellion, and the adoption of the Constitution of 1787: "It has been said that the people had already surrendered all their powers to the state sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
| |
