The assent of the States in their sovereign capacity is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it, and their act was final. It required not the affirmance,... Niles' National Register - 第 67 頁1819完整檢視 - 關於此書
| Friends of the Union (Baltimore, Md.) - 1861 - 68 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...complete obligation, and bound the State sovereignties. 42 "It has been said that the people had already surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties,... | |
| Frank Moore - 1862 - 848 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, ¡md thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
| Frank Moore - 1862 - 830 頁
...in calling a Convention, and tlius submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were nt perfect liberty to accept or reject it ; and their...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume find modify the powers... | |
| Frank Moore - 1862 - 824 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...final. It required not the affirmance, and could not bo negatived by tho State Governments. Tho Constitution, when thus adopted, was of complete obligation,... | |
| Frank Moore - 1862 - 812 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it ; and their a<St was final. It required not the affirmance, and could not be negatived by the State Governments.... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1863 - 76 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question -whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
| 1897 - 678 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that Instrument to the pepple. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...complete obligation, and bound the State sovereignties. This government is acknowledged by all to be one of enumerated powers. The principle, that it can exercise... | |
| Maryland. Constitutional Convention, William Blair Lord, Henry Martyn Parkhurst - 1864 - 744 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...State sovereignties. "It has been said that the people bad already surrendered all their powers to the State sovereignties, and had nothing more to give.... | |
| John Jay - 1864 - 80 頁
...capacity is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...complete obligation, and bound the State sovereignties." From that time, for all the purposes declared by the Constitution, the people of the United States... | |
| New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1868 - 672 頁
...capacity, is implied in calling a convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject...surrendered all their powers to the state sovereignties, and had nothing more to give. But, surely, the question whether they may resume and modify the powers... | |
| |