...that- where the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty to use care, and the thing causing the accident is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident la such that in the ordinary course of things does not occur if those who have the tianagement or control...

...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from a want of care.9 Thus, "...

...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from a want of care.' Tested by...

...the ground. The court said there must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. This case is...

...allegation of negligence: "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, docs not happen if those who have the management used proper care, it...

...show the men on the engine did see, or could have seen plaintiff 's danger. ( 5 ) " Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant, or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...

...Brten v. New York etc. RR Co., 109 NY 297. Or, as expressed in an English case, "where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is euch as, in the ordinary course of things, docs not happen if those who have the management use proper...

...(/), in these terms: — " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. " But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of (e) Carpue v. London...

...reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing (meaning the thing which caused the injury) isshown to be under the management of the defendant or his...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absense of explanation by the defendant, and that the accident arose from want of care." In the...

...doctrine was thus laid down: "There must « some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...