 | John Norton Pomeroy - 1899 - 940 頁
...rule: "The rule of the law is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, willfully canses another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... | |
 | Hawaii. Supreme Court - 1900 - 496 頁
...frequently approved by this court, that "where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter hia previous condition, the former is concluded from... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1886 - 1038 頁
...and value at the date of the seizure. 2. AVhoro one. by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and imluc.es him to act on that Ы-Hef, so a* to alter his previous position, the former is estopped from... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1902 - 810 頁
...one with full knowledge of his rights and the facts, wilfully, by words or conduct, causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and thereby induces the other to act on that belief and expend money or assume obligations which he would... | |
 | International Correspondence Schools - 1903 - 636 頁
...principle has come to be applied to all cases where one, by words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position." Estoppels are by (1) matter... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1903 - 874 頁
...So. Rep. 506); Holcomb v. Boynton, 151111. 294 (37 N. ,E. Rep. 1031). In the last case it was said: "If both parties are equally cognizant of the facts,...acted under a mistaken idea of the law, the other cannot say he has been deceived thereby, and is entitled to an application of the rule, but will be... | |
 | 1904 - 998 頁
...680, 38 Am St Rep. 403. An estoppel exists where one by his words or conduct willfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position. The word "willfully," as... | |
 | Arizona. Supreme Court - 1904 - 534 頁
...& E. 469, by Lord Demnan, in these words: 'When one by his acts or conduct willfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is precluded from... | |
 | Sir Frank Tillyard - 1906 - 412 頁
...estoppel has therefore been thus stated : " Where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded (we... | |
 | Thomas Gold Frost - 1906 - 736 頁
...in Pickard v. Sears,4 where he says that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is precluded... | |
| |
... that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against... 
