 | Great Britain. Bail Court - 1851 - 400 頁
...accordingly precluded from disputing his liability. A person who, by his words or conduct, leads others to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and to act on that belief, is estopped from subsequently averring that a different state of things existed... | |
 | 1852 - 890 頁
...them. Levistones v. Claiborne, 5 R. 196. 6. Where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... | |
 | Samuel Ware Fisher - 1852 - 394 頁
...the rules of law, alluded to, is, that where one, by his words or conduct, willfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is precluded from... | |
 | James Kent - 1854 - 728 頁
...precision by Baron 1'arke, as follows : Where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induees him to act on that belief, or to aller his own previous position, the former is concluded from... | |
 | Asa Kinne - 1854 - 358 頁
...acquitted. Verdict— Not Guilty. FRAUD. . Where one person, by his words or conduct, causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and thus induces him to act on that belief, so aa injuriously to affect his previous position, he is concluded... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1854 - 732 頁
...subject, is thus stated by Lord DENMAN : " Where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1854 - 1124 頁
...the rule laid down in Pichard v. Scars and Freeman v. Cook, " that if a party wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to net on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from... | |
 | John William Smith - 1855 - 798 頁
...judgment of the Court in that case, " that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded... | |
 | Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords, Charles Clark, William Finnelly - 1857 - 1044 頁
...in Pickard v. Sean, That rule is, ' that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1858 - 568 頁
...Exchequer in Freeman v. Cooke, — that, " where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, or to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from... | |
| |
... that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against... 
