 It is a maxim, not to be disregarded, that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment...  United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules ... - 第 269 頁United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner 著 - 1938完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Colorado. Court of Appeals - 1904 - 680 頁
...opinion that amounts to a judicial decision.' In Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat. 97, Chief Justice Marshall said, 'It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care,... | |
 | 1904 - 412 頁
...opposition to this rule of construction, some dicta of the court, in the case of Marbury v. Madison. It is a maxim not to be disregarded, that general...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1904 - 830 頁
...Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, and again in Carroll v. Lessee of Carroll, 16 How. 275, 287, that it was " a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions,...suit when the very point is presented for decision." An examination of the cases, in which those general expressions are found, will show that the court... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1904 - 348 頁
...Marbury v. Madison. It is a maxim, not to be disregarded, that general expressions, in every opm--j ion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which...suit, when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care,... | |
 | John Marshall - 1905 - 518 頁
...opposition to this rule of construction, some dicta of the court, in the case of Marbury v. Madison. It is a maxim not to be disregarded, that general...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care... | |
 | Simeon Eben Baldwin - 1905 - 538 頁
...be taken in connection with the case in which 1 1 Cranch's Reports, 137. ' 6 Wheaton's Reports, 264, those expressions are used. If they go beyond the...suit when the very point is presented for decision. ... In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the single question before the court, so far as that case can... | |
 | United States. Comptroller of the Treasury - 1905 - 958 頁
...expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the cases in which those expressions were used. If they go beyond the case they may be respected,...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason for this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 756 頁
...speaking for the court of some dicta of that court in Marbury v. Madison, observed as follows : — " It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions,...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care,... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1906 - 766 頁
...opposition to this rule of construction, some dicta of the court, in the case of Marlniry \. Madison. ''It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general...suit when the very point is presented for decision. The reason of this maxim i< obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care,... | |
 | Frank Hendrick - 1906 - 604 頁
...its opinion in Marbury v. Madison.2 Marshall, CJ, said: 'It is a maxim that general expressions of opinion are to be taken in connection with the case...subsequent suit when the very point is presented. The reason of this maxim is obvious. The question actually before the court is investigated with care,... | |
| |
