 They may, more correctly, perhaps, be denominated domestic dependent nations. They occupy a territory to which we assert a title independent of their will, which must take effect in point of possession when their right of possession ceases. Meanwhile,...  American Indian Persistence and Resurgence - 第 91 頁由 編輯 - 1994 - 261 頁完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | John R. Wunder - 1996 - 352 頁
...Court held that the Indian tribes should properly be viewed as "domestic dependent nations," and that "(t|heir relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian."16 Only one year later, the Court held "(t|he treaties and laws of the United States contemplate... | |
 | John Denvir - 1996 - 336 頁
...nations," rather they should be "denominated domestic dependent nations ... in a state of pupilage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian."5 Thus the federal government settled on a degree of sovereignty for Indian tribes, partial... | |
 | John R. Wunder - 1996 - 356 頁
...point of possession when their right to possession ceases. Meanwhile they are in a state of pupilage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to a guardian."7 The next year, Marshall again emhraced these complexities and further defined the state... | |
 | John R. Wunder - 1996 - 342 頁
...government.22 One year before Worcester, Chief Justice John Marshall stated that an Indian nation's "relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian."28 Over a century later, in Williams v. Lee, the Supreme Court affirmed its earlier view.24... | |
 | Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy - 1997 - 615 頁
...ceases." Meanwhile, the Indians in this country, Marshall said, "in a -- are in a state of pupilage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian." So there is with any modern man -- you people-9,000 here now-are in danger of becoming just mass. Very... | |
 | Albert Furtwangler, Chief Seattle - 1997 - 188 頁
...frame 0171. session when their right of possession ceases. Meanwhile they are in a state of pupillage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian" (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Peters 15-20, in Prucha, 59). The effect of these words was that Indians... | |
 | William Johnson Everett - 1997 - 221 頁
...trading partner, they are actually "domestic dependent nations." They are "in a state of pupilage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian." 67 Thus, they could not claim the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to adjudicate their dispute with Georgia—nor,... | |
 | Frank Pommersheim - 1997 - 288 頁
...v. Georgia, 30 US (5 Pet.) 1 (1831), which described Indians as being "in a state of pupilage. This relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian." 95. Williams, supra note 90, at 675. 96. Id. at 676. This process is described in more detail at pp.... | |
 | Carolyn Logan - 1997 - 410 頁
...legitimatized. In 1831, the United States Supreme Court defined the Indians "in a state of pupilage. Their relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian."34 In 1832 the Alabama Supreme Court labeled the Indians "beasts," "savages," and "wildmen,"... | |
 | Francis Paul Prucha - 2023 - 608 頁
...the court. He asserted that the Indian tribes were, instead, "domestic dependent nations" and that their relation to the United States "resembles that of a ward to his guardian."25 Two dissenting justices, however, believed that the Cherokees were a foreign state, and... | |
| |
