 | Roy Marvin Robbins - 1926 - 234 頁
...the united States west of the Mississippi, and not within the States of Missouri and Louisiana, and the Territory of Arkansas, and, also, that part of...the United States east of the Mississippi River, and within any state to which the Indian title had not been extinguished, was termed as the "Indian Country."... | |
 | United States - 1928 - 698 頁
...within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and also other parts of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not...which the Indian title has not been extinguished, shall, for the purpose of the act be deemed to be Indian country, the test of whether the prohibition... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1246 頁
...west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and 'Louisiana, or the territory [285 of Arkansas, and also that part of the United States...act be. taken and deemed to be the Indian country." Construing this section, it was decided, in Bates v. Clark, 95 US 204, 209, 24 L. ed. 471, 473, that... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1980 - 306 頁
...Territory of Arkansas, and, a- so, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi River, a.-.d not within any state to which the Indian title has not been extinguished... .* Although this definition was discarded in the Revised Statutes, see RS 5596, it is apparent that... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1981 - 954 頁
...1978 Opinion of the Court 442 US the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and, also, that part...to which the Indian title has not been extinguished . . . ." 4 Stat. 729. Although this definition was discarded in the Revised Statutes, see Rev. Stat.... | |
 | Janet Lecompte - 1980 - 372 頁
...part of the United States west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri or Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and also, that part...which the Indian title has not been extinguished. The Indian country of the 1840's included all or part of the present states of Wisconsin, Minnesota,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs - 1983 - 1430 頁
...of the United Slates west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and, also, that part of the United Slates east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which the Indian title has not been... | |
 | Francis Paul Prucha - 1986 - 442 頁
...of the United States west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the Territory of Arkansas, and also, that part...States east of the Mississippi river, and not within a state|,| to which the Indian title has not been extinguished, for the purposes of this act, be taken... | |
| |
That all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi, and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas, and, also, that part of the United States east of the Mississippi river, and not within any state to which... 
