 In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the government of the Union and those of the States. They are each sovereign, with respect to the objects committed to it, and neither sovereign with respect to the objects committed to the other.  Construction Construed, and Constitutions Vindicated - 第 89 頁John Taylor 著 - 1820 - 344 頁完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Eugene Wambaugh - 1915 - 1106 頁
...portion of sovereignty does it appertain ? Does it belong to one more than to another ? In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...with respect to the objects committed to the other. . . . But the constitution of the United States has not left the right of Congress to employ the necessary... | |
 | George A. Talley - 1915 - 258 頁
...what portion of sovereignty does it appertain? Does it belong to one more than to another? In America the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...with respect to the objects committed to the other." This McCulloch case is one of the famous cases of American history; it has always been accepted as... | |
 | Harold Edgar Barnes - 1915 - 376 頁
...what portion of sovereignty does it appertain? Does it belong to one more than to another? In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...with respect to the objects committed to the other. But the Constitution of the United States has not left the right of Congress to employ the necessary... | |
 | George Washington Rightmire - 1917 - 928 頁
...states. The • submission to judicial solution of controversies arising between these two governments, "each sovereign, with respect to the objects committed...with respect to the objects committed to the other," McCulloch v. State of Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 400, 410, but both subject to the supreme law of the... | |
 | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace - 1918 - 310 頁
...Justice Marshall could say, as he did in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (4 Wheaton, 316): In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...respect to. the objects committed to the other. The first incident is thus recounted by Madison: Previous to the arrival of a majority of the States, the... | |
 | James Brown Scott - 1918 - 200 頁
...observed in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (4 Wheaton, 316, 410), decided in 1819, that: In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...with respect to the objects committed to the other. Mr. Chief Justice Chase, upon whose sturdy shoulders the mantle of the great Chief Justice fell, impressively... | |
 | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace - 1919 - 240 頁
...decided in 1819, and which the late Professor Thayer considered the greatest of his cases: In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...with respect to the objects committed to the other. And in the great and leading case of the State of Texas v. White (7 Wallace, 700, 725), decided in... | |
 | William Bennett Munro - 1919 - 680 頁
...Chief Justice Marshall a hundred years ago and it has not since been materially changed. "In America the powers of (sovereignty are divided between the...states. They are each sovereign with respect to the rights committed to it, and neither is sovereign with respect to the rights committed to the other."... | |
 | James Brown Scott, United States. Supreme Court - 1919 - 572 頁
...States. The submission to judicial solution of controversies arising between these two governments, ' each sovereign, with respect to the objects committed...with respect to the objects committed to the other,' McCulloch v. State of Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4oo, 41o, but both subject to the supreme law of the... | |
 | Illinois State Bar Association - 1899 - 650 頁
...opinion of the Chief Justice, where, in speaking of the two governments, he tersely said: "Each is sovereign, with respect to the objects committed to it, and neither sovereign icith respect to the objects committed to the other.'' (Page 410). So it is impossible for PART II.... | |
| |
