 The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any...  Scrap Book on Law and Politics, Men and Times - 第 84 頁George Robertson 著 - 1855 - 404 頁完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Charles Evans Hughes - 1925 - 360 頁
...preponderant opinion at the time the Federal Constitution was adopted. Hamilton said in the Federalist: "A constitution is in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. ... If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, . .... | |
 | Bernard Schwartz - 1993 - 480 頁
...nothing."70 The courts, Hamilton urged, were designed to keep the legislature within constitutional limits. "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and...is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It must therefore belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning... | |
 | Elvind Smith - 1995 - 424 頁
...void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing. The interpretation of the laws... is the proper and...is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of... | |
 | William Quirk, R. Randall Bridwell - 1995 - 162 頁
...intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority." The...is the proper and peculiar province of the courts", and a "constitution is in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law." This does... | |
 | Martin H. Redish - 1995 - 240 頁
...Federalist No. 78, at 492 (Alexander Hamilton) (Benjamin F. Wright, ed. 1974) ("The interpretation of law is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges, as fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning. . . ."). I have... | |
 | George Wescott Carey - 1994 - 220 頁
...faction may poison the fountains of justice" (483-84). In Federalist 78, Publius is content to note that "the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts." Thus, because the Constitution "is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law,"... | |
 | St. George Tucker, William Blackstone - 2000 - 3301 頁
...intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The...is in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them, to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of... | |
 | Noel B. Reynolds, W. Cole Durham - 2003 - 320 頁
...Posterity, 163-64. This is the language of The Federalist as well when Publius [Alexander Hamilton] writes: A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. . . . where the will of the legislature declared in its statutes, stands in opposition... | |
 | Tim Hames, Nicol C. Rae - 1996 - 354 頁
...permanent will of the people of the United States as opposed to the temporary will of the legislature: A constitution is. in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of... | |
 | Glenn Burgess - 1996 - 252 頁
...onwards): see Hamilton in The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter (New York, 1961), no. 78, p. 467: 'A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law.' 37. Perhaps these remarks do something to clarify the question of the anachronism... | |
| |
