網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版
[blocks in formation]

London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., In re (Mass. S. J. C.)..

London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., In re (N. Y. S. C.)..
London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., In re (Mass. S. J. C.)..
London Guarantee & Accident Co., Limited, In re (N. Y. S. C.).....1120
London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. (State ex rel.) v. District Court
of Hennepin County et al. (Minn. S. C.).

692

812

835

London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. et al. v. Industrial Accident Com-
mission et al. (Cal. D. C. A.)..

743

Louisville & N. R. Co. vs. Industrial Board of Illinois et al. (Ill. S. C.) 542
Lutz vs. Wilmanns Bros. Co. (Wis. S. C.)....

[blocks in formation]

McLaughlin, Com'r of Highway, v. Industrial Board of Illinois et

al. (Ill. S. C.)

504

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Sanitary Dist. of Chicago vs. Industrial Board of Illinois et al. (Ill.
S. C.)

San Bernardino County vs. Industrial Acc. Commission of State of
California et al. (Cal. D. C. A.)...

494

548

Santa Ana Sugar Co. of Santa Ana et al. v. Industrial Accident Com-
mission et al. (Cal. D. C. A.).

745

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Western Indemnity Co., Inc., et al. vs. Industrial Acc. Commission of
State of California (Cal. D. C. A.).

300

Wulff v. Bossler (Mich. S. C.)...

633

Yeople, In re (N. Y. S. C.).

.1135

- Yolo Water & Power Co. vs. Industrial Acc. Commission of Cali-
fornia et al. (Cal. D. C. A.)..

499

Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co., Ltd., In re (N. Y. S. C.) 701

From January to June, 1918, inclusive.

Acceptance of Act.

(SEE ELECTION.)

Accident.

Accident. Where lifting of can of paint caused a blood vessel in servant's
lungs to burst, there was an accidental injury within the act and it is
immaterial that it had burst before but had healed over and might
burst again-whether such death was an "accidental injury" within the
meaning of the act is a question of law for the court. Southwestern
Surety Ins. Co. vs. Owens et al. (Tex.)...
Accident. Sunstroke is a personal injury caused by accident within the
meaning of the act. State ex rel. Rau vs. District Court, Ramsey
County, et al. (Minn.)..

Accident. Typhoid fever caused by drinking infected water is not an ac-
cident within the meaning of the statute. State ex rel. Faribault Woolen
Mills Co. et al. vs. District Court, Rice County, et al. (Minn.).
Accident.-Evidence showed that deceased died solely of heart failure and
there was no unexpected event in connection with his work. Johnson
vs. Mary Charlotte Mining Co. (Mich.)
Accident.-Theory that claimant's disease of diabetes resulted from injury
sufficient to sustain findings. Balzer VS. Saginaw Beef Co. et al.
(Mich.)
Accident.-Evidence sufficient to sustain findings that deceased workman
died from blood poisoning as result of injury arising out of and in
course of employment. State ex rel. Albert Dickinson Co. et al. VS.
District Court, Hennepin County et al.-Rackman vs. Albert Dickinson
(Minn.)

Accident.-Compensation can only be made for personal injuries or death by
accident arising out of and in course of employment and unless a
disease is traceable to an accident as defined in statute, the law
does not award compensation. Blair vs. Omaha Ice & Cold Storage
Co. (Neb.)
Accident.-Evidence held to justify finding that claimant's disease of the
spine was result of accident. Squire-Dingee Co. vs. Industrial Board of
Illinois et al. (Ill.).

271

93

89

393

399

422

424

331

770

814

994

..1010

Accident.-Employee compelled to wade through flood water which over-
flowed defendant's car works causing old wound on foot to become in-
fected, requiring amputation, suffered an accident within the meaning
of the statute. Monson v. Battelle (Kan.)
Accident. Under the Compensation Act the injury need not be an accident-
physical impact is not an essential prerequisite within the act. In re
Mooradjian-In re London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd. (Mass.).... 812
Accident.-Servant killed by drinking muriatic acid which he took from
under the sink in refrigerating room mistaking it for his bottle of drink-
ing water there was causal connection between employment and ac-
cident. In re Osterbrink (Mass.).
Accident. The words "accident" and "injury" as used in Workmen's Com-
pensation Act are not synonymous, but the accident produces the injury
and in point of time they are concurrent. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.
et al. (Mich.)
Accident.-Evidence sufficient to support finding of board that deceased
servant met his death by accidentally inhaling illuminating gas. Holnagle
v. Lansing Fuel & Gas Co. et al. (Mich.)..
Accident. Where employee engaged in removing brickwork around a boiler
died as result of heat prostration, it not appearing that he exercised in
any unusual manner, or to an unusual degree different from other em-
ployees engaged in same work, that death cannot be deemed accidental
so as to warrant an award. Roach v. Kelsey Wheel Co. et al. (Mich.).1025
Accident. Where servant sustained an inguinal hernia while lifting block
of timber, or falling, or being struck, nothing out of ordinary_happen-
ing, injury was not accidental. Tackles v. Bryant & Detwiler Co. et al.
(Mich.)
.1031
Accident. Where servant died while on scaffold, it could not be assumed
that he made a misstep which frightened him, and that fright caused
mitral regurgitation from which he died, since assumption would be con-
jectural-injury received by workman while engaged in his usual work
without intervention of something unusual or fortuitous is not an ac-
cident. Guthrie v. Detroit Shipbuilding Co. (Mich.)..
Accident.-Burden of proof rested upon employee to establish that his
hernia was caused by an accident which he suffered while in employer's
service. Nagy v. Solvay Process Co. (Mich.)....
Accident. Includes injuries to workmen which are unexpected and uninten-
tional-show card sign writer whose sight was impaired by use of quan-
tities of alcohol was entitled to compensation. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
of New York et al. v. Industrial Accident Commission of California
et al. (Cal.)

..1035

.1042

... 903

« 上一頁繼續 »