[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

.is no necessity which demands at our hands the applica-
tion of the public funds for purposes of this kind. Neither
the “common defence,” nor the “general welfare,” demands
it. And if the security of either of the points, to which
this road is contemplated to be constructed, did demand
the exercise of those powers, and the application of our
treasure, I ask in the name of common sense, sir, if this
road, a mere paltry earthen way, would afford the security
desired ?
• But, four general considerations have been urged in
support of the bill, and they may truly be said to be most
pliant considerations; for they are brought to bear ..
all subjects of internal improvement, requiring the public
lands or the public money.
It shall be my object to show that not one of those
considerations requires that this road should be made. I
shall take them up in the order in which I find them in
the report of the engineers made to this House at the
first session of the nineteenth Congress. And the first in
order is its commercial advantage.
It has been gravely maintained that this rond is all im-
portant as a line of intercommunication between distant
points for the facilities of commercial intercourse, and

the transportation of produce and merchandise. Now,

sir, admitting the constitutionality and the propriety of making roads for commercial purposes, is there any one who seriously believes that this, or any other road, can possibly be to: to compete, successfully, with the mighty father of rivers, and its tributary streams? What, sir change the channel of produce from the finest rivers in the world, with the powerful agency of steam, propelling boats hundreds .P.miles in the twenty-four hours, with a mere “earthen" road ' When the mighty Missouri shall turn her current back upon her source, and force a passage through the Rocky Mountains, and empty her vast tribute of waters into the Pacific, and the beautiful Ohio shall be brought through the tunnel §: to be cut by the gentleman from Virginia, [Mr. MERCER] and

ur her waters into the Chesapeake, then, and not

man, if I did not believe that a remedy is within his reach;
that is, to give up his exploded canal system, and embrace
the railroad plan; and a most happy opportunity now
awaits him. Let him unite the interest of the company
over which he now presides, with that of the Baltimore
and Ohio Railroad Company, and, by a unity of action
and community of feeling, they will find their interests
mutually advanced, and the most happy results growing
out of the arrangement. I hope I shall be pardoned for
this digression. But let me ask the honorable chairman
who introduced this bill, [Mr. HEMPHILL] how he can re-
concile it to his vast notions of grand and magnificent in-
ternal improvements, and the resources and capacity of
this Government to prosecute them, to an indefinite ex-
tent, as he set forth in his speech But what is more, how
can he reconcile it to himself, to fall so far behind the
advance of the age in improvements, as to propose an
“earthen" road as a means to facilitate commerce, and
promote the “common defence and the general welfare {"
Now, if the gentleman had proposed a plan for the con-
struction of a railroad, on some plan commensurate with
the greatness and resources of this nation, there would
have been some plausibility in his arguments. But, upon
what have we heard his beautiful theories and high .
wrought figures exhausted ? Why, upon an earthen road
—a road of mud, liable to be washed by every shower,
and subject to the vicissitudes and casualties incident to
every season.
Before I take leave of this branch of the subject, I ask
leave to read a brief o from the report of the engi-
neers; we shall then be able to judge of their views as to
the commercial importance of this road. -
I read from the report of the engineers, which may b
found in the 9th volume of Executive papers, session of
1825–1826, document 156, page 22. “In relation to ex-
ternal commerce," say the engineers, “it appears to us
that a road from Washington eity to New Orleans will not
afford, as to transportation, advantages of national import-
ance; for the road will cross generally all the main water-

till then, let the gentleman propose the construction of courses perpendicular to the coast; and in the directions roads through that region of country for commercial and by means of which all the transportations are effective purposes, which relate to operations of external commerce.” But what kind of road have we proposed to us by this “However, we have remarked in the foregoing part of bill? “An earthen road,” sir. Yes, sir, a miserable, pal. this report, that the main watercourses were crossed by try, earthen road. The honorable chairman and his com. the eastern route at the head of sloop navigation, and by mittee have not only fallen far in the rear of the march the middle route at the head of boat navigation, therefore

of science and the arts in road making, but they have a road in the direction of either will accommodate the dis

gone entirely back to olden times. Earthen roads were tricts through which it passes, for the transportation of the first system of intercommunication known to man. their products to the navigable streams. Under this local They were superseded by turnpikes, as they are called, (mark the words, gentlemen, local, not general) point of which consisted in the application of stone, gravel, and view, the external commerce will become benefited to a other materials, which improved the soundation, and made certain extent,” &c. o. it capable of bearing greater weight. Mr. McAdam has Thus we see that, in the view of the engineers, this road improved upon those roads, by a peculiar and regular would not insure benefits general in their character, but method of preparing and applying the stone; and from such as are merely local ; and even that, no further than to his celebrity in his improvements, has arisen the name of afford districts through which it may pass the advantage McAdamized roads. of transporting their produce to the navigable streams. But, above all, is that highest effort of the human intel- This being the case, is there any one who will press the lect, in perfecting a system of road intercommunication, application of the national treasure (which should never which, for ease, safety, and expedition, challenges the be disbursed only with a view to national objects, wherein astonishment and admiration of the world. |ali the parts are equally benefited) to purposes local in That system which has outstripped canals, and ruined their character, and that to a limited extent? It would be their stocks in England; and that system which will su- merging the “general welfare" into local welfare, and, ersede canals here, as well as all other systems of the against all principle, the greater into the lesser. H. which have been devised by human ingenuity—yes, Next in order are “political considerations.” I shall be sir, the honorable gentleman from Virginia [Mr. MERCER] brief upon this branch of the subject, as there is only one must hear the appalling, the heart-rending fact, that this prominent consideration, in a political point of view, which mighty monument, (Chesapeake and Ohio Canal,) which, can be urged, which is, that roads and canals will operate for years, he has been laboring with a zeal and exertion to as bonds of union, and more strongly cement us together, erect to his memory, and which, no doubt, he had fondly and prevent a falling off of the parts. Without stopping hoped would transmit his name down to the latest posteri- to controvert the correctness of the position, it certainly ty, must fall, and must give place to the superior improve-|presupposes one of two things: either that there is a dis. ment of railroads. I could sympathize with that gentle- position in the States to fly off from the centre, or a re

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

pulsive action at the centre to throw them off, and hence the necessity of these additional bonds of union. Nothing, in my opinion, is to be apprehended from the former; would to God I could say so much for the latter If ever the calamities of disunion should be experienced by this nation, the causes, proximate and remote, will be traced to the action of the Federal Government. The mismanagement of this central machinery, so beautiful in its conception, and so perfect in its structure, and which worked so harmoniously whilst kept within the legitimate sphere prescribed by those rules expressly laid down for the government of its action, will alone produce those fatal consequences. By overleaping here the constitutional boundaries so clearly defined, by throwing the whole machinery out of gear, and giving a looseness to our operations, propelled on by the force of combined in. terests, composing a majority, against a minority, the latter will be compelled to take refuge under the old relation in which the States stood to each other; that of separate, distinct, and independent sovereignty. The States themselves will cling to the Union whilst there is a hope left to rest on; the oppressions of this Federal Government can alone drive them off. | Perhaps if there were ever a crisis in the affairs of our Government which required additional bonds to hold us together, that crisis is now at hand. But if this road is to be the remedy, the committee have certainly mistaken its proper location. Western Virginia and Eastern Tennes. see are not about to fly off from the Union, and therefore do not require this work; if danger is to be apprehended, it is from another quarter. The South is the point to which we should direct our attention. Certainly every political consideration would direct us to the metropolitan route. We must encircle South Carolina with some band, or she, from report, will be off at a “tangent,” and that suddenly. But let me seriously ask of every member of this committee, what stronger bonds of union do freemen need, or the States require, than those forged out, wrought, and put in order by the master workmen of the revolution ? Link connecting link, forming a chain of Government more beautiful in its principles, and beneficial in its results, (whilst acting within the limits of the original design) than any ever devised by the wisdom of man...What was this design? It was, that all the parts should share in equal proportion the benefits or injuries resulting from the com. pact; a perfect reciprocity was to be observed and preserv. ed Under a strict observance of those sacred principles, sir, what have we to fear ! I answer nothing, either from external or internal causes. If fears are to be entertained, they are upon the other side of the question; and let me here admonish gentlemen who are seeking to provide ad. ditional bonds of union, by cutting canals and constructing roads, to beware lest they by their operations cut the liga. ments of the constitution which now binds us together, and which forms the only sure and certain ties by which we can remain united. No political consideration, therefore, in my opinion, does require the construction of this road; but, on the contrary, eminently demands the rejection of the bill. “Military considerations" are the next in order, and to which I shall ask the attention of the committee. The honorable chairman [Mr. HEMPHILL] set out by telling us that the two points to which this road is contemplated to be run, are dangercusly situated, and eminently exposed in case of invasion, &c., and that this is important as a military road for the transportation of troops and munitions of war. With regard to the exposed situation of New Orleans, I beg leave to differ entirely with the honorable chairman. As to Buffalo, I know but very little about it, nor have I sought to know, because I looked upon that end of the road as having been tacked on by the committee, merely as a means of buying .# votes, and not that

the necessity of the nation to: the work. I shall leave that end, therefore, in the hands of others.

So far from New Orleans being in an exposed situation, I do say, and I say it without the fear of contradiction, that it is the most strougly fortified place in the nation. Eve pass leading from the Gulf of Mexico to the city, is well secured by the best and the most costly fortifications. There are no less than five forts (I believe I am not mistaken in the number; if I am, the gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. White] will correct me) erected for the security of that city against maritime or other invasion from the Gulf. These forts are capable of mounting some hundred pieces of ordonance, at least enough to sink any fleet that would ever attempt a passage up the Mississippi to the city. We have already expended near two millions of dollars in defending the territory of Louisiana by permanent fortifications, and estimates are now before us for a continuation of those works.

The following is a statement of those expenditures, litely furnished at my request by a gentleman of the É. gineer Department. (Mr. C. then read the following letter:)

“To the Hon. S. P. CARson,

House of Representatives :

DEAR SIR: The following statement will show you pret

|ty nearly the cost of defending the territory of Louisiana

by permanent fortifications, viz. Fort Wood, at the Chef Menteur

Pass, - - - * - $ 411,673 11 Fort Pike, at the Rigolets Pass, - 359,393 14 Fort Jackson, Plaquemine Bend, - 624,064 53 Battery at Bayou Bienvenue, . 96,447 80 Tower at Bayou Dupre, ...- - 16,677 41

Amount appropriated - - 1,508,255 99
Add for a fort on Grand Terre, *
Barrataria, estimated at - 264,517 52
For a fort, in place of Fort St.
Philip, at Plaquemine Bend, es-
timated at - - - 77,810 79

$ 1,850,584 30” The estimate' for one of those works, (Fort Jackson,) for the present year, is eighty-five thousands dollars. Thus we see, sir, that the attention of the Government has been directed to the defence and protection of that point, and that the fact, as stated by the honorable chairman who introduced this bill, with regard to the “exposed situation" of that city, does not exist. Now, as regards the necessity of this road for the transportation of troops and munitions of war, I here take upon myself the responsibility of pronouncing, although in contradiction to the position of the gentleman who introduced the bill, [Mr. HEMPHILL] that no such necessity exists; and I further say, that it would nut only be idle, but the extreme of folly, to expend money upon this road with a view to military advantages. What say gentlemen who urge this branch of the subject? Why, “that New Orleans must always look to Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, &c. for men and provisions to protect and feed them in time of war.” Well, I grant this; but what further do they urge? Why, “that this road must be made to transport these troops and provisions upon.” Now can it be possible that any man, in his sober senses, and under the influence of reason, can, for one moment, entertain the belief that, if this road were made, even one soldier or solitary barrel of provisions, from Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, or any other State north of those, would travel over it? What's bring men from the State of Ohio across the States of Kentucky and Tennessee?, Aye, and across the Ohio river, too, with its current teeming with steamboats, ready to waft the soldiers and provisions to the point of destination. But no, they must trudge through the muds of Kentucky and Tennessee, by marches of from ten to fifteen miles per day, till they in

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

tersect this road (after crossing navigable and inviting rivers) at Florence, Alabama; and then they will have the peculiar advantage of travelling this superb national earthen road from thence to New Orleans. . I invite gentlemen who think despatch and saving of time important in military operations, to calculate how long it would take troops to get to New Orleans by this “national road" from Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, &c., and compare it with the ease, convenience, and despatch, afforded by steam §. on the navigable rivers which ass through those States and empty into the Mississippi. t cannot be denied that troops from any part of Kentucky or Ohio could get to New Orleans by steamboat convey. ance before they could reach Florence, in Alabama, the point of intersection with this road. Under this view of the case, the positions laid down by the honorable chairman, [Mr. HEMPHILL] with regard to the “exposed condition" of New Orleans, and the necessity of this road as affording means of defence, fall to the ground, and the x. superstructure of argument based upon them falls so. If further arguments were necessary to show the impropriety, may, the excessive folly, of making this road for military purposes, they would be found by a recurrence to the history of our last war, particularly in the operations in the southern section of the Union. There was a time when New Orleans was “dangerously situated and eminently exposed;" there was a time, sir, when that city was invaded by a powerful and well disciplined army; an army, too, stimulated to action by the “booty and beauty.” which were promised them. This was a case of great emergency—this was a time of deep and dreadful anxiety, but sufficient for the occasion were the spirits convened, and hastily convened, for the defence of the city, Yes, an army was convened, defeated the enemy, and saved New Orleans. What military road, made at vast expense of time and treasure, were those troops transported over ! None; yet they got to New Orleans, fought the battles of their country, and got home again; and thus will it be ever; this country will always find security in the strong arm of her “citizen soldiers." Dangers may stand thick around them; they only stimulate to exertion. The noblest deeds are done upon the most dangerous emergencies, and the glory of achieving them is the strongest incentive to action. Need I say more ? Does the history of all ages that have gone before us, present a solitary example of a nation, at peace with the world, and whose policy it is to cultivate and maintain those pucific relations, preparing for the transportation of troops by large expenditures of public money for the construction of roads in this time of profound peace But, on the contrary, does not all history prove that the first generals the world has produced, asked not roads over which to transport troops for the advancement of their military operations? Let me ask, what engineers designated the route, or what nation appropriated the funds, to construct a passage over the Alps for Hannibal and his Carthaginiaus, when he pushed his conquests to the very walls of Rome Or who directed Caesar to the point at which to pass the Rubicon, when he pronounced that “the die was cast,” and struck the fatal blow at the liberties of his country But to come down to the present time—to things which transpired but yesterday, on the other side of the water. Did Nicholas tax his subjects to raise a revenue to open those passes through the Balkan, over which Diebitsch led that army which shook the Ottoman empire to its centre and which, had they not been stopped by pacific measures, and, I might add, by the interposition of other European powers, jealous of the rising greatness and resources of the Russian empire, the christian flag would this day have been waving on the walls of Constantinople? It is by the energy of powerful minds and capable commanders, that armies are led to victory and glorious achievements; not

[ocr errors]

by roads, for they might lead to defeat as well as victory. And here let me remark that those facilities to military operations are always occupied by the strongest; and such a work might prove a curse, instead of a blessing, (as was proven, said a gentleman standing near Mr. CARson [Mr. Davis, of South Carolina] upon the Bladensburg course last war.) Yes, [resumed Mr. C.] but I would rather lose the argument afforded by the mention of that disagreeable subject, than wound the pride of the House by recalling their recollection to it. The “transportation of the mail" is the next and last consideration to which I shall ask the attention of the committee. I feel that my strength is failing me too much to go into this branch of the subject to the extent I had desired. I will lay it down as my opinion, however, that the framers of the constitution did not intend, by the words “establish post offices and post roads," to confer the power to construct roads, &c., but only meant that Congress should designate the roads over which the mails should be carried, and the points at which it should be opened. I shall not attempt an argument, sir, to prove the correctness of this construction, but it being mine, it is sufficient to governme. The first inquiry which suggests itself with regard to the expediency of constructing this road for the transportation of the mail, is, does any necessity or impediment exist to the transportation of the mail, which requires the application of this sum of money to remove or remedy? Has the Post Office Department complained of a want of facilities in this o: and asked the construction of a road at our hands? Or have they even suggested the propriety of the appropriation of any sum of money for purposes of the kind They have not; but, upon the contrary, we are informed by the very able report of the distinguished gentleman who presides over that department, that the facilities are now ample, and will be increased as the means of the department will justify, or the public interest shall require. I ask the attention of the committee while I read part of that i. which treats of the very subject now under consideration. [Mr. C. read the following extract from the report of the Postmaster General:] “The mail communication between New Orleans and the seat of the General Government, by way of Mobile and Montgomery, in Alabama, and Augusta, in Georgia, will, from the commencement of the ensuing year, be effected three times a week, affording comfortable conveyances for travellers, and the whole trip performed in the period of two weeks, each way, through the capitals of Virgiuia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. “Lines of four-horse post coaches will also be established, from the first day of January next, to run three times a week, both ways, between Nashville and Memphis, in Tennessee. This improvement was deemed important to keep a regular and certain intercourse between the Western States and New Orleans—Memphis being a point on the Mississippi to which steamboats can come at all seasons of the year; it being contemplated to extend this line to New Orleans by steamboats, so soon as the means of the department will justify, and the public interest shall require it. To give greater utility to this improvement, a weekly line of coaches will also be established at the same time from Florence, in Alabama, (where it will connect with the line from Huntsville,) to Bolivar, in Tennessee, at which point it will form a junction with the line from Nashville to Memphis." Now, what more can be required?...Does not this report also prove that steam navigation will supercede roads for all purposes, wherever it can find water for the boats to run on f The dispatch and quickness of steamboat passage from Memphis to New Orleans has drawn the attention of the Postmaster General to that point; and it is already

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

viewed as the route which can be travelled with most expedition, because of the advantages of steam power. Does not this speak volumes against the expenditure of public imoney upon roads, when it must be manifest that they never would be travelled for the purposes pretended here as the strong reasons for constructing them? It may be possible that, with regard to despatch and saving of time, a direct road from this place to the Mississippi river, thence by steamboats to New Orleans, would be the best. But, taking this as granted, it does not prove the necessity of our constructing a road for the purpose. Roads are already made. The mail is now transported from this to Nashville, Tennessee, seven times a week, in post coaches, at a cost of upwards of thirty-four thousand dollars per annum; and this line, sir, as we see from the report just read, is to be continued three times a week to Memphis, and from thence to New Orleans by steamboats. What more is wanting or what more, in modesty, can be asked I shall now turn my attention to the relative merits of the different routes; and, if this road is to be made, I think I can show the propriety of selecting the most direct, practicable route. For all purposes, connected with the transportation of the mail, the saving of time, cost of construction, distance, &c., the most “direct, practicable route,” as proposed by the amendment, I had the honor to lay upon your table some days, since, and which was printed by order of the House, and which I shall offer to the committee before I take my seat, is certainly the preferable one. . I lay down, then, as incontrovertible facts, that the route I propose will be better, the cost of construction less, the distance less, and the number of inhabitants accommodated much greater. - Now, if I establish these positions, what member can refuse to vote for the amendment, whether he be for or against the bill The gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Isacks] has clearly established the correctness of my three first positions, (as to the goodness, cost, and distance,) and the engineers who made the reconnoissance of the different routes have proven the fourth, (the number of inhabitants to be accommodated.) The gentleman from Tennessee, [Mr. Isacks] said (and I truly thank him for the argument) that on the east of the mountains we had a fine level surface; that nature, in her works, had been kind to us; we had nothing to do but throw up a little sand, and we had fine roads, &c. With him, [he said] and his constituents, and the people along the route, selected, it was very different; they had mountains and limestone to contend with, and natural obstructions, which required the hand of art to alter, and render them in a condition for the use and advantage of the country, &c. &c., and therefore the western route was the proper one. In answer to this argument, I have nothing to offer; the gentleman has granted all I ask —nay, more, sir, I did not intend to disparage his route, by portraying the lofty mountains and the quantities of limegtone, which it would cost millions to make a road over, but only meant to urge, what cannot be denied, that the direct route is unquestionably the nearest; that the east side of the mountains afforded abundant materials for the construction of a road; that the surface was better, and the graduation more easy, than on the west side of the mountains; and that the cost of construetion would be much less. The engineers support me in these positions; and what they have failed to do, has been abundantly supplied by the gentleman from Tennessee, [Mr. Isacks.] With regard to the population, sir, to be accomodated by this road, I beg leave to read from the report of the engineers, (the same as before recited) page 22: “Leaving out the States (say the engineers) of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the District of Columbia, the States accommodated directly by the eastern and middle (or direet, as I propose) route will be (census of 1820)— — .

[blocks in formation]

Virginia, - - - - 1,065,336 Tennessee, - - - - 422,813 Alabama, - - - - 127,901

Making 1,616,050”

This shows a difference in favor of the direct route, of one million fifty-nine thousand seven hundred and forty-six of a population to be accommodated by this road. [Here Mr. BLAIR, of Tennessee, requested Mr. C. to read further from the report, with regard to the States that would be indirectly as well as directly accommodated.] Mr. C. resumed. I am requested by my honorable friend from Tennessee, [Mr. § I say my friend, sir, because I know him to be so, to read further from this report, I will do so, and I assure my friend that due deference shall be paid to his route, (western route.) “But (say the engineers) if we add Kentucky and Georgia, which will be indirectly accommodated by the western route, we shall have for the population accommodated, both directly and indirectly, by this route,

Virginia, - - - - 1,065,336 Tennessee, - - - - 422,813 Alabama, - - - - 127,901 Kentucky, - - - - - - 564,317 Georgia, - - - - 340,989

Total 2,521,386”

Now, even with the addition of the population of the State of Kentucky, which they say is to be indirectly ac: accommodated, there is a balance still in favor of the direct route, of a population directly accommodated, of one hundred and fifty-four thousand four hundred and forty; But why does my friend from Tennessee [Mr. BLAIR) press this indirect consideration upon the House * Does he not know, sir, that Kentucky cannot be benefited, either directly or indirectly, by this road And does he not further know that the State of Kentucky would never have been mentioned, if it had not been to effect political results, favorable to the men in power when this report was made Does my friend recollect who was Secretary of State at that time and the exertions made to continue his influence and control over the State of Kentucky? Was not every branch of the “American system" brought to bear upon her, and particularly this branch of internal improvement Those were the causes which produced this report, or the name of Kentucky would never have been mentioned. But the times were dangerous, the “line of safe precedent" was threatened, and every nerve was exerted to arrest the blow; but all, all would not do; the line was broken, and it is matter of deep surprise to see those who gave their aid in producing the result, now using the same flimsy, futile, and disingenuous arguments which were resorted to by those persons, with a hope of continuing their power, merely to effect sectional objects, or with a view of producing benefits to themselves and their eonstituents. The gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. BLAIR) also said that nothing had ever been done to advance the interests of his constituents, or his State, by this Government. The gentleman has surely forgotten that four hundred thousand acres of land in Alabama, equal to six hundred thousand dollars, were appropriated by this Government for the opening of a canal round the Muscle shoals, on the Ten

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

nessee river; and that the completion of that work would
admit steam navigation into East Tennessee. One steam-
boat has already been (as I am informed) so high up the
Holston as a place called the Boat Yard, which is the dis-
trict of my honorable friend, [Mr. Blam.
[Mr. B. here corrected Mr. C. and said the boat had only
ascended as high as Knoxville.]
I thank the gentleman for the correction. I had mistak-
en the point, but it does not weaken the argument; for
the streams leading from the district represented by that
gentleman to Knoxville are navigable, and boats are daily
assing them. I heard a fact stated the other day, by a
ighly intelligent gentleman who resides near Abin
Virginia, while conversing with the Vice President and
some other gentlemen, “that he had started at one time
forty boats, each containing one hundred barrels of salt,
from a point on the north fork of the Holston river, fifteen
miles above Abingdon, which salt was probably to supply
North Alabama, and part of Tennessee. I mention this
fact, as an answer to that part of the argument of the gen:
tleman from Tennessee, which related to the transporta-
tion of salt from the salt wells in Virginia. Certainly, if
this road were made, no one would think of transporting
salt by wagons, incurring the expense of teams, &c., which
could not haul more than ten barrels at most, when they
could send one hundred barrels by one boat. But why
talk of those considerations which are merely sectional in
their character They should have no bearing in this
case, if indeed, the work is national. But who will say, after
witnessing the whole proceeding of the committee which
introduced this bill, that national considerations were the
causes which induced them to report this bill, and to make
the selection they have done for the location of the road
National considerations have nothing to do with it; it is
the offspring of a combination, based upon local considera.
tions for the accomodation of gentlemen who compose
part of the committee, and through whose districts this
road is to run ; and the location fixed on was for their ac-
commodation, not for the nation. Yet we are called on
now to appropriate millions of the public money (two mil-
lions two hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars is the
sum wanted for the present) to promote the interests of
certain sections of the country, and to subserve the views
of combined interests upon this floor. I say combined;
and, if any have doubted the fact before, has not the intro-
duction of this bill, for a lateral route, leading from
“Zanesville, Ohio, to pass through Lexington, Kentucky,
Nashville, Tennessee, and to intersect this road at Florence,
Alabama,” put the seal o the arrangement, and de-
yeloped the matter, in bold relief, before every eye not
blinded by interest or other motive
But look who compose the committee who produced
these bills. See the States they are from, and the sections
of States they represent;" then couple the routes and cir-
cunstances together, and tell me if there is room left to
entertain a doubt as to the causes which have produced
the effect. I will push this subject of combination no fur-
ther, lest the feelings of some personal friends might not
escape unscathed. I desist therefore, not that I fear the
contest, or doubt the results, but for the reason just men-
I have endeavored to show that the considerations urged
by the supporters of this bill did not exist, or at least did
not exist to that extent which required at our hands the
application of the public money. How far I have suc.

* The Committee on Internal Improvements is composed of
Messrs. Hemphill of Pennsylvania, chairman, Blair, of Tennessee,
Haynes, of Georgia. Letcher, of Kentucky, Vinton, of Ohio, Craig,
of Virginia, and Butman of Maine.
This route passes directly through the districts represented by Craig,
of Virginia, and Blair, of Tennessee. The lateral route from Zanes-
wille, Ohio, and passing through Kentucky, is Messrs. Vinton and
Letcher's part of the system. The Buffalo end passes through
Pennsylvania, the State which the honorable chairman, Mr. Hemp-
hill, is from.--Note by Mr. C.
Vol. VI.-85.

on, desirab

ceeded in my feeble effort, I must leave to be decided, by

those who have been so indulgent as to favor me with a

hearing. But above all the reasons which have been urged against the expenditure of public money at this time, is there not yet another, which should sink deep upon the minds of the friends and supporters of our present illustrious Chief Magistrate? Does lie not stand pledged to this nation to pay off the public debt, and to ... the proud and sublime spectacle to the world, of a nation out of debt; which, indeed, sir, would be “something new under the sun "—and was he not pledged by his friends, in anticipation, to effect this !. important object? What said they, sir? Why, elect the plain, old republican, Andrew Jackson; he will bring “order out of chaos;" he will restore republican oil. will pay off the national debt, and relieve us from the necessities of high tariffs, &c. And what are those very men doing, who were foremost in exciting those expectations, and pledging him for those results why, sir, we now see them willing, nay, urgent, to equander millions of money, because, perchance, their immediate districts may receive some little benefit. In my opinion, if ever there was a man anxiously desirous to fulfil the just expectations of his friends, and to advance the general interest of this nation, Andrew Jackson is that man. But, if we go on in the manner we have started, how can he discharge those obligations, and meet the expectations of the American people? Is not every dollar which we loop. beyond the current expenses of the year, so much of the money which would otherwise go to the payment of the debt of the nation If we appropriate these two millions and a quarter, where will the surplus be, or where any money, except the sinking fund, to apply to the payment of our Šiš debt i Nay, the sinking fund, also, is to be broken in upon; that sacred guaranty, pledged to, the credit: ors of the nation, must be taken also, and distributed among the States for purposes of education. . [Here Mr. Isacks said he was not aware of any such intention on the part of any one]. Mr. C. resumed: I allude to the resolution passed by this House, instructing a committee to bring in a bill for the distribution of the nett proceeds of the sale of public lands among the States for purposes of education; and those lands were solemnly pledged by this Government to its creditors, and belong to the sinking fund, and should not be touched till every farthing of the obligation is discharged. Mr. ISACKS said he did not vote for the resolution.] or did I charge the gentleman. I only speak of what is going on, and the effect it will have upon the administration; and I must further tell the gentlemen from Ten: nessee [Messrs. BLAIR and Isaacks] that, if they desired (which I know they do not) to ruin and blast forever the hard-earned fame of that best of men, who, upon all occasions, has proven his disinterested devotion to his country and to his friends, they could not have fallen upon a better plan than this, of appropriating money, leaving him *. erless, and without the means of doing that which he stands pledged to do.

Are they prepared to hear him exclaim, as did Caesar, (when he was struck by, as he thought, his best friend,) “and you, too, my son?" Will they bind him in fetters, and leave him, mangled and bleeding, to the mercy of his political enemies, who would glory in the spectacle? If I believed them prepared for this, the line of separation should be eternally drawn between them and me." I supported the election of General Jackson, because I believed him honest and meritorious, and I shall support his administration, because now I know him to be so; and he will realize the expectations of his friends throughout the nation, if his friends here, by their misguided policy, do not prevent him... My strength has failed me; I

am done. I only ask leave to tender my thanks to the

« 上一頁繼續 »