網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

when the poor woman, taken in adultery, was presented to her accusers by the Master of the Old and of the New Law, he did not order her to be stoned; on the contrary, he reproached their injustice, tracing on the sand, with his finger, the old Hebrew proverb, Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.' All then retired; the oldest being the first to depart, since, the greater their age, the more adulteries they had committed.

6

"The doctors of the canon law tell me, that this story of the woman taken in adultery is related only in the gospel of St. John, and that there it is nothing more than an interpolation; that Leontius and Maldonat affirm that it is but to be found in one ancient Greek copy; that not one of the twenty-three first commentators has spoken of it; that neither Origen, nor St. Jerome, nor St. John Chrysostom, nor Theophylact, nor Nonnus, knew anything of it; and that it is not in the Syriac Bible, nor in the version of Ulphilas.

"Such are the arguments advanced by my husband's advocates, who would not only shave my head, but stone me also.

"However, those who plead for me gay, that Ammonius, a writer of the third century, acknowledges the truth of this story; and that St. Jerome, while he rejects it in some passages, adopts it in others; in short, that it is now authenticated. Here I hold, and say to my husband - If you are without sin, shave my head, confine me, take my property; but if you have committed more sins than I have, it is I who must shave you, have you confined, and seize your possessions. In both cases the justice is the same.'

[ocr errors]

condemned by the House of Peers, should' the little man prove unfaithful? It is clear that, if women have not their husbands punished, it is when they are not the strongest."

CONCLUSION OF THE CHAPTER ON
ADULTERY.

In order to obtain an equitable verdict in an action for adultery, the jury should be composed of twelve men and twelve women, with an hermaphrodite to give the casting vote in the event of necessity.

But singular cases may exist wherein raillery is inapplicable, and of which it is not for us to judge. Such is the adventure related by St. Augustine in his sermon on Christ's preaching on the Mount.

Septimius Acyndicus, proconsul of Syria, caused a Christian of Antioch, who was unable to pay the treasury a pound of gold (the amount to which he was taxed), to be thrown into prison, and threatened with death. A wealthy man promised the unfortunate prisoner's wife to furnish her with the pound, if she would consent to his desires. The wife hastened to inform her husband, who begged that she would save his life at the expense of his rights, which he was willing to give up. She obeyed; but the man who owed her the gold deceived her by giving her a sackful of earth. The husband, being still unable to pay the tax, was about to be led to the scaffold; but this infamous transaction having come to the ears of the proconsul, he paid the pound of gold from his own coffers, and gave to the Christian couple the estate from which the sackful of earth had been taken.

My husband replies, that he is my It is certain that, far from injuring her superior and my head; that he is taller husband, the wife, in this instance, acted than me by more than an inch; that he conformably to his will; not only obeyis as rough as a bear; and that, conse-ing him, but also saving his life. St. quently, I owe him everything, and he Augustin does not venture to decide on owes me nothing. the guilt or virtue of this action; he is afraid to condemn it.

But, I ask if Queen Anne of England is not the head of her husband? if the Prince of Denmark, who is her High Admiral, does not owe her an entire obedience? and if she would not have him

It is, in my opinion, very singular that Bayle should pretend to be more severe than St. Augustin. He boldly condemns the poor woman. This would be incon

ceivable, did we not know how much almost every writer has suffered his pen to belie his heart-with what facility his own feelings have been sacrificed to the fear of enraging some evil-disposed pedant-in a word, how inconsistent he has been with himself.

A Father's Reflection.

citizens. He who was then at their head said to him gravely-" Friend Chancellor, thou oughtest to know that our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ hath forbidden us to affirm otherwise than by yea or nay : he hath expressly said:-1 forbid thee to swear by heaven, because it is the throne of God: by the earth, because it is his footstool; by Jerusalem, because it is the city of the king of kings; or by thy head, be

A word on the contradictory education which we bestow upon our daughters.cause thou canst not change the colour of We inculcate an immoderate desire of a single hair. This, friend, is positive; pleasing; we dictate when nature does and we will not disobey God to please enough without us, and add to her lessons thee and thy parliament." "It is imevery refinement of art. When they are possible to argue better," replied the perfectly trained, we punish them if they Chancellor; "but be it known to thee, put in practice the very arts which we that Jupiter one day ordered all beasts of have been so anxious to teach! What burden to get shod; horses, mules, and should we think of a dancing-master who, even camels, instantly obeyed; the asses having taught a pupil for ten years, would alone resisted; they made so many reprebreak his leg because he had found him sentations, and brayed so long, that Judancing with other people? piter, who was good-natured, at last said to them, Asses, I grant your prayer: you shall not be shod; but the first slip you make, you shall have a most sound cudgelling."

Might not this paragraph be added to the chapter of contradictions?

AFFIRMATION ON OATH.

It must be allowed that, hitherto, the Quakers have made no slips.

AGAR, OR HAGAR

us, as a man of a bad heart.

We shall not say anything of the affirmations so frequently made use of by the learned. To affirm, to decide, is allowable only in geometry. In everything else let us imitate the Doctor Metaphrastes WHEN a man puts away his mistressof Molière-it may be so; the thing is his friend-the partner of his bedfeasible; it is not impossible; we shall see. he must either make her condition toleraLet us adopt Rabelais' perhaps, Mon-bly comfortable, or be regarded, amongst taigne's what know I? the Roman non liquet, or the doubt of the Athenian academy: but only in profane matters, be it understood, for in sacred things, we are well aware that doubting is not permitted. The primitives, in England called Quakers, are allowed to give testimony in a court of justice on their simple affirmation, without taking an oath. The peers of the realm have the same privilege the lay peers affirming on their honour, and the bishops laying their hands on their hearts. The Quakers obtained it in the reign of Charles II., and are the only sect in Europe so honoured.

The Lord Chancellor Cowper wished to compel the Quakers to swear like other

We are told that Abraham was very rich in the desert of Gerar, although he did not possess an inch of land. However, we know with the greatest certainty, that he defeated the armies of four great kings with three hundred and eighteen shepherds.

He should, then, at least have given a small flock to his mistress Agar, when he sent her away in the desert. I speak always according to worldly notions, always reverencing those incomprehensible ways which are not our ways.

I would have given my old companion Agar a few sheep, a few goats, a few suits of clothes for herself and our son Ismael,

ALCHYMY.

good she-ass for the mother and a pretty foal for the child, a camel to carry their luggage, and at least two men to attend them and prevent them from being devoured by wolves.

But when the Father of the Faithful exposed his poor mistress and her child in the desert, he gave them only a loaf and a pitcher of water.

have been known to ruin themselves in this pursuit.

The number of those who have believed in transmutations is prodigious, and the number of cheats has been in proportion to that of the credulous. At Paris we have seen Signor Dammi, Marquis of Conventiglio, obtain some hundred louis from several of the nobility that he might make them gold to the amount of two or

Some impious persons have asserted that Abraham was not a very tender fa-three crowns. ther that he wished to make his bastard son die of hunger, and to cut his legitimate son's throat! But again let it be remembered, that these ways were not our ways.

It is said that poor Agar went away into the desert of Beer-sheba. There was no desert of Beer-sheba; this name was not known until long after: but this is a mere trifle; the foundation of the story is not the less authentic.

It is true that the posterity of Agar's son Ismael took ample revenge on the posterity of Sarah's son Isaac, in favour of whom he had been cast out. The Saracens, descending in a right line from Ismael, made themselves masters of Jerusalem, which belonged by right of conquest to the posterity of Isaac. I would have made the Saracens descend from Sarah; the etymology would then have been neater.

It has been asserted that the word Saracen comes from sarac, a robber. I do not believe that any people have ever called themselves robbers; nearly all have been robbers, but it is not usual for them to take the title. Saracen descending from Sarah, appears to me to sound better.

ALCHYMY.

THE emphatic al places the alchymist as much above the ordinary chymist, as the gold which he obtains is superior to other metals. Germany still swarms with people who seek the philosopher's stone, as the water of immortality has been sought in China, and the fountain of youth in Europe. In France, some

The best trick that has ever been performed in alchymy was that of a Rosicrucian, who, in 1620, went to Henry, Duke of Bouillon, of the house of Turenne, Sovereign Prince of Sedan, and addressed him as follows:

"You have not a sovereignty proportioned to your great courage, but I will make you richer than the emperor. I cannot remain for more than two days in your states, having to go to Venice to hold the grand assembly of the brethren; I only charge you to keep the secret. Send to the first apothecary of your town for some litharge; throw into it one grain of the red powder which I will give you; put the whole into a crucible; and in a quarter of an hour you will have gold."

The prince performed the operation, and repeated it three times, in presence of the virtuoso. This man had previously bought up all the litharge from the apothecaries of Sedan, and got it resold after mixing it with a few ounces of gold. The adept, on taking leave, made the Duke of Bouillon a present of all his transmuting powder.

The prince, having made three ounces of gold with three grains, doubted not that with three hundred thousand grains he should make three hundred thousand ounces, and that he should in a week possess eighteen thousand seven hundred and fifty pounds of gold, besides what he should afterwards make. It took at least three months to make this powder. The philosopher was in haste to depart; he was without anything, having given all to the prince, and wanted some ready money in order to hold the states-general of her

F

metic philosophy. He was a man very sovereign of the day of justice? Thee moderate in his desires, and asked only { we adore! to thee only do we look for twenty thousand crowns for the expenses protection. Lead us in the right wayof his journey. The duke, ashamed to in the way of those whom thou hast give so small a sum, presented him with loaded with thy graces, and not in the forty thousand. When he had consumed way of the objects of thy wrath-of them all the litharge in Sedan, he made no more who have gone astray.'" gold, nor ever more saw his philosopher or his forty thousand crowns.

All pretended alchymic transmutations have been performed nearly in the same manner. To change one natural production into another, for example, iron into silver, is a rather difficult operation, since it requires two things a little above our power-the annihilation of the iron and creation of the silver.

We must not, however, reject all discoveries of secrets and all new inventions. It is with them as with theatrical pieces, there may be one good out of a thousand.

ALCORAN.

OR, MORE PROPERLY, THE KORAN.
SECTION I.

Such is the introduction. Then come three letters, A, L, M, which, according to the learned Sale, are not understood, for each commentator explains them in his own way; but the most common opinion is, that they signify Ali, Latif, Magid-God. Grace, Glory.

God himself then speaks to Mahomet, in these words:

"This book admitteth not of doubt. It is for the direction of the just, who believe in the depths of the faith, who observe the times of prayer, who distribute in alms what it has pleased me to give them, who believe in the revelation which hath descended to thee, and was delivered to the prophets before thee. Let the faithful have a firm assurance in the life to come; let them be directed by their Lord; and they shall be happy.

"As for unbelievers, it mattereth not whether thou callest them or no: they do not believe; the seal of unbelief is on their hearts and on their ears; a terrible punishment awaiteth them.

THIS book governs with despotic sway the whole of northern Africa, from Mount Atlas to the desert of Barca, the whole of Egypt, the coasts of the Ethiopian Sea to the extent of six hundred leagues, Syria, Asia Minor, all the countries round the Black and the Caspian Seas (excepting "There are some who say, 'We bethe kingdom of Astracan) the whole em- lieve in God and in the Last Day,' but in pire of Hindostan, all Persia, a great their hearts they are unbelievers. They part of Tartary; and in Europe, Thrace, think to deceive the Eternal; they deMacedonia, Bulgaria, Servia, Bosnia,ceive themselves without knowing it. Greece, Epirus, and nearly all the islands as far as the little strait of Otranto, which terminates these immense possessions.

In this prodigious extent of country there is not a single Mahometan who has the happiness of reading our sacred books; and very few of our literati are acquainted with the Koran, of which we almost always form a ridiculous idea, notwithstanding the researches of our really learned men.

The first lines of this book are as follow:-"Praise to God, the sovereign of all, worlds-to the God of mercy, the

Infirmity is in their hearts, and God himself increaseth this infirmity," &c.

These words are said to have incomparably more energy in Arabic. Indeed, the Koran still passes for the most elegant and most sublime book which has been written in that language.

We have imputed to the Koran a great number of foolish things which it never contained. It was chiefly against the Turks, who had become Mahometans, that our monks wrote so many books, at a time when no other opposition was of much service against the conquerors of

Constantinople. Our authors, much more numerous than the Janissaries, had no great difficulty in ranging our women on their side; they persuaded them that Mahomet looked upon them merely as intelligent animals; that, by the laws of the Koran, they were all slaves, having no property in this world, nor any share in the Paradise of the next. The falsehood of all this is evident; yet it has all been firmly believed.

It was, however, only necessary, in order to discover the deception, to have read the fourth sura or chapter of the Koran, in which would have been found the following laws, translated in the same manner by Du Ryer, who resided for a long time at Constantinople; by Maracci, who never went there; and by Sale, who lived twenty-five years among the Arabs.

Mahomet's Regulations with respect to Wives.

1.

Never marry idolatrous women, unless they will become believers. A Mussulman servant is better than an idolatrous woman, though of the highest rank.

2.

They who, having wives, wish to make a vow of chastity, shall wait four months before they decide.

Wives shall conduct themselves to wards their husbands as their husbands conduct themselves towards them.

3.

You may separate yourself from your wife twice; but if you divorce her a third time, it must be for ever; you must either keep her humanely or put her away kindly. You are not permitted to keep anything from her which you have given to her.

4.

Good wives are obedient and attentive, even in the absence of their husbands. If your wife is prudent, be careful not to have any quarrel with her; but if one

should happen, let an arbiter be chosen from your own family, and one from hers.

5.

Take one wife or two, or three, or four, but never more. But if you doubt several, take only one. your ability to act equitably towards Give them a suitable dowry, take care of them, and speak to them always like a friend.

6.

You are not permitted to inherit from your wife against her will; nor to prevent her from marrying another after her divorce, in order to possess yourself of her dower, unless she has been declared guilty of some crime.

When you choose to separate yourself from your wife and take another, you must not, though you have even given her a talent at your marriage, take any thing from her.

7.

You are permitted to marry a slave, but it is better that you should not do so.

8.

A repudiated wife is obliged to suckle her child until it is two years old, during which time the father is obliged to maintain them, according to his condition. If the infant is weaned at an earlier period, it must be with the consent of both father and mother. If you are obliged to entrust it to a strange nurse, you shall make her a reasonable allowance.

Here, then, is sufficient to reconcile the women to Mahomet, who has not used them so hardly as he is said to have done. We do not pretend to justify either his ignorance or his imposture; but we cannot condemn his doctrine of one only God. These words of his 122nd sura, "God is one, eternal, neither begetting nor begotten; no one is like to him ;' these words had more effect than even his sword in subjugating the East.

Still his Koran is a collection of ridiculous revelations and vague and inco

« 上一頁繼續 »