網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

1819.

The States have no power, by taxation, or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner controul the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by Congress, to carry into effect the powers M'Culloch vested in the national government.

This principle does not extend to a tax paid by the real property of the Bank of the United States, in common with the other real property in a particular State, nor to a tax imposed on the proprietary interest which the citizens of that State may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the State.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.

This was an action of debt brought by the defendant in error, John James, who sued as well for himself as for the State of Maryland, in the County Court of Baltimore County, in the said State, against the plaintiff in error, M'Culloch, to recover certain penalties under the act of the legislature of Maryland, hereafter mentioned. Judgment being rendered against the plaintiff in error, upon the following statement of facts, agreed and submitted to the Court by the parties, was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland, the highest Court of law of said State, and the cause was brought, by writ of error, to this Court.

It is admitted by the parties in this cause, by their counsel, that there was passed on the 10th day of April, 1816, by the Congress of the United States, an act, entitled, "an act to incorporate the subscribers to the Bank of the United States;" and that there was passed, on the 11th day of February, 1818, by the General Assembly of Maryland, an act, entitled, " an act to impose a tax on all Banks, or branches thereof, in the State of Maryland, not chartered by the legis

V.

State of Ma

ryland.

1819.

McCulloch

V.

State of Ma

ryland.

lature," which said acts are made part of this state-
ment, and it is agreed may be read from the statute
books in which they are respectively printed. It is
further admitted, that the President, Directors and
Company of the Bank of the United States, incor-
porated by the act of Congress aforesaid, did organ-
ize themselves, and go into full operation in the City
of Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania, in pur-
suance of the said act, and that they did on the

day of
eighteen hundred and seventeen, es-
tablish a branch of the said Bank, or an office of
discount and deposit in the city of Baltimore, in the
state of Maryland, which has from that time until
the first day of May, eighteen hundred and eighteen,
ever since transacted and carried on business as a Bank,
or office of discount and deposit, and as a branch of
the said Bank of the United States, by issuing Bank
notes and discounting promissory notes, and perform-
ing other operations usual and customary for Banks
to do and perform, under the authority and by the di-
rection of the said President, Directors and Company
of the Bank of the United Sates, established at Phila-
delphia as aforesaid. It is further admitted, that the
said President, Directors and Company of the said
Bank, had no authority to establish the said branch,
or office of discount and deposit at the city of Balti-
more, from the State of Maryland, otherwise than
the said State having adopted the Constitution of
the United States and composing one of the States
of the Union. It is further admitted, that James
William McCulloch, the defendant below, being the
cashier of the said branch or office of discount and

1819.

M'Culloch

V.

ryland.

deposit, did, on the several days set forth in the declaration in this cause, issue the said respective Bank notes therein described, from the said branch, or office, to a certain George Williams, in the city of State of MaBaltimore, in part payment of a promissory note of the said Williams, discounted by the said branch or office, which said respective Bank notes were not, nor was either of them, so issued on stamped paper in the manner prescribed by the act of Assembly aforesaid. It is further admitted, that the said President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States, and the said branch or office of discount and deposit have not, nor has either of them, paid in advance, or otherwise, the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, to the Treasurer of the Western shore, for the use of the State of Maryland, before the issuing of the said notes, or any of them, nor since those periods. And it is further admitted, that the Treasurer of the Western Shore of Maryland, under the direction of the Governor and Council of the said State, was ready, and offered to deliver to the said President, Directors and Company of the said Bank, and to the said branch, or office of discount and deposit, stamped paper of the kind and denomination required and described in the said act of Assembly.

The question submitted to the Court for their decision in this case, is as to the validity of the said act of the General Assembly of Maryland, on the ground of its being repugnant to the constitution of the United States, and the act of Congress aforesaid, or to one of them. Upon the foregoing statement of facts, and the pleadings in this cause, (all errors in

1819.

M'Culloch

V.

State of Ma

ryland.

which are hereby agreed to be mutually released,) if the Court should be of opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover, then judgment it is agreed shall be entered for the plaintiffs for twenty-five hundred dollars, and costs of suit. But if the Court should be of opinion that the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover upon the statement and pleadings aforesaid, then judgment of non pros shall be entered, with costs to the defendant.

It is agreed that either party may appeal from the decision of the County Court, to the Court of Appeals, and from the decision of the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court of the United States according to the modes and usages of law, and have the same benefit of this statement of facts, in the same manner as could be had if a jury had been sworn and empannelled in this cause, and a special verdict had been found, or these facts had appeared and been stated in an exception taken to the opinion of the Court, and the Court's direction to the jury thereon.

Copy of the Act of the Legislature of the State of Maryland, referred to in the preceding statement.

'An Act to impose a Tax on all Banks or Branches thereof in the State of Maryland, not chartered by the Legislature.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland, That if any Bank has established, or shall without authority from the State first had and obtained, establish any branch, office of discount and

deposit, or office of pay and receipt, in any part of this State, it shall not be lawful for the said branch, office of discount and deposit, or office of pay and receipt, to issue notes in any manner, of any other denomination than five, ten, twenty, fifty, one hundred, five hundred and one thousand dollars, and no note shall be issued except upon stamped paper of the following denominations; that is to say, every five dollar note shall be upon a stamp of ten cents; every ten dollar note upon a stamp of twenty cents; every twenty dollar note, upon a stamp of thirty cents; every fifty dollar note, upon a stamp of fifty cents; every one hundred dollar note, upon a stamp of one dollar; every five hundred dollar note, upon a stamp of ten dollars; and every thousand dollar note, upon a stamp of twenty dollars; which paper shall be furnished by the Treasurer of the Western Shore, under the direction of the Governor and Council, to be paid for upon delivery; Provided always, That any institution of the above description may relieve itself from the operation of the provisions aforesaid, by paying annually, in advance, to the Treasurer of the Western Shore, for the use of the State, the sum of fifteen thousand dollars.

And be it enacted, That the President, Cashier, each of the Directors and Officers of every institution established, or to be established as aforesaid, offending against the provisions aforesaid, shall forfeit a sum of five hundred dollars for each and every offence, and every person having any agency in circulating any note aforesaid, not stamped as aforesaid directed, shall forfeit a sum not exceeding one hun

[blocks in formation]

1819.

M'Culloch

V.

State of Ma

ryland.

« 上一頁繼續 »