讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
abolished Abraham Baldwin Abraham Lincoln adopted African slave-trade argument authority believe better commerce Compromises of 1850 Congress Constitution Convention decided declared Democratic deny doctrine Douglas's Dred Scott decision duty election equal established exclude slavery exist expressed fact favor Federal territories fisheries friends gentlemen give Hamlin HANNIBAL HAMLIN House Illinois improvements institution of slavery Judge Douglas Kansas Kentucky labor land legislation Legislature matter measure ment Mexico Missouri Compromise Nebraska bill negro never North Ohio opinion ordinance of 87 Oregon party passed patriotic political popular sovereignty present President principle prohibiting slavery proposition provision purpose question repeal Republican Republican party resolution sacred right Sangamon river Senate slave slave-trade slavery South Southern speech stitution Supreme Court Texas thing tion understand Union United vote Whig whole Wilmot Proviso wrong
第 347 頁 - Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again; The eternal years of God are hers; But Error, wounded, writhes in pain, And dies among his worshippers.
第 239 頁 - Can the people of a United States Territory, in any lawful way, against the wish of any citizen of the United States, exclude slavery from its limits prior to the formation of a State constitution?
第 243 頁 - ... the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution.
第 216 頁 - I hold that, notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence — the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man.
第 217 頁 - I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.
第 181 頁 - This they said, and this they meant. They did not mean to assert the obvious untruth that all were then actually enjoying that equality, nor yet that they were about to confer it immediately upon them. In fact, they had no power to confer such a boon. They meant simply to declare the right, so that enforcement of it might follow as fast as circumstances should permit.
第 202 頁 - But you say you are conservative — eminently conservative — while we are revolutionary, destructive, or something of the sort. What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried? We stick to, contend for, the identical old policy on the point in controversy which was adopted by "our fathers who framed the government under which we live...
第 189 頁 - It is this : Does the proper division of local from Federal authority, or anything in the Constitution, forbid our Federal Government to control as to slavery in our Federal Territories ? " Upon this, Senator Douglas holds the affirmative, and Republicans the negative.