ew Mexico io. Calhoun Palmyra Springfield.. Plattsburg. Milan Helena Omaha City. West Point. Norfolk July 18, 1855 Act May 26, 1824.. Brownsville Beatrice July 7, 1868. Nebraska City July 3, 1868. Lincoln Dakota City Niobrara Grand Island North Platte. Lowell Bloomington. Carson City Austin Eureka. Belmont. Sept. 3, 1868.. Act July 2, 1862. May, 1873. Act May 24, 1858.. Act Mar. 3, 1874 Act May 10, 1800.. Act Mar. 3, 1803 Act May 10, 1800.. Act May 10, 1800.. Act May 10, 1800.. Act Mar. 3, 1807. Act Mar. 3, 1819... Act Mar. 3, 1819... Act Mar. 3, 1819... Act Mar. 3, 1819... Act Mar. 3, 1819. Act Mar. 3, 1819.. Act Mar. 3, 1819... Act Mar. 3, 1819... Apr. 23, 1836...... To Calhoun. Order of March 25, 1863. To West Point. To Beatrice. To Lincoln. To Niobrara. To Bloomington. To Eureka. To Pioche. September 14, 1877. To Independence, Cal., May 31, 1873. September 14, 1877. Act June 12, 1840. List of existing local land offices (96 in number) and names of officers, November 10, 1880. State or Ter Land district. Register. Receiver. ritory. California. Colorado Dakota Florida Idaho.. Iowa. Kansas Florence Central City. Lake City Gainesville Concordia Salina Wichita John M. Cross Pelham J. Anderson Alfred James Gustavus A. Wetter. Jonathan M. Howe Richard L. Walker.. W. H. Tancre Solomon Cooper. Charles H. Chamberlain. Charles A. Brastow. William J. Anderson. James Stout. Richard J. Monroe. A. W. Eaton. H. H. Griffiths, George W. Watson. List of existing local land offices and names of officers-Continued. Register. George Baldy. Louis Dupleix. J. B. Bloss Charles Doughty Henry M. Stafford Edward Stevenson Darwin S. Hall Thomas C. Shapleigh Morris C. Russell Soren Listol Charles B. Tyler.. W. P. Dunnington Daniel II. Freeman John B. Owens Mons Grinager Richard C. Kerr Gustave Reiche George A. Moser George A. C. Wooley. Davis Willson James II. Moe Edward A. Kriedler Hiram W. Parker. Simon W. Switzer Melville B. Hoxie. Joseph B. McDowell. Benjamin F. Chambers Edward S. Butler. Alex. D. Buckworth C. A. Witherell F. H. Hinckley George D. Bowman John C. Davis Henry W. Dwight.. James H. Evans Louis T. Barin. William F. Benjamin Laban Coffin. James M. Armstrong Josiah T. Brown. Walter W. Newlin.. Edw. H. Morrison.. R. B. Kinne... John H. Knight J. Gardner Callahan Michael Field. Ferdinand A. Husber.. George W. Fay. Stephen H. Alban Edgar W. Mann William G. Tonn H. McMaster. Receiver. William M. Burwell. James M. Wilkinson. Paul C. Sletten. Thomas II. Pressnell. John H. Allen. C. N. Baird. James Stott. William B. Lambert. John Taffe. Samuel C. Wright. James M. Adams. Norman Thatcher. William M. Garvey. Henry R. Crosby. Salt Lake City.. Moses M. Bane. Registers and receivers are paid an annual salary of $500 each, and are allowed fees up to and including 000 per annum each. 12 L 0-VOL III CHAPTER VII. SURVEYS OF THE PUBLIC LANDS. The cessions of the several States were organized from time to time into geographical divisions by the laws creating them and the lands were ordered to be surveyed, including lands to which the Indian title had been or would be extinguished. The same proceeding took place with purchased territory in 1803, 1819, 1848, 1850, and 1853. The extension of the surveys being authorized by Congress over a district of country, the Commissioner of the General Land Office directs the surveyor-general of the district, whose office is created by the law prior to extending the surveys, to begin the same. THE RECTANGULAR SYSTEM. The land surveys under the United States are uniform and done under what is known as the "rectangular system." This system of surveys was reported from a committee of Congress May 7, 1784. The committee consisted of Thomas Jefferson, chairman; Messrs. Williamson, Howell, Gerry, and Reas. This ordinance required the public lands to be divided into “kundreds" of ten geo graphical miles square, and those again to be subdivided into lots of one mile square each, to be numbered from 1 to 100, commencing in the northwestern corner and count ing from west to east and from east to west continuously; and also that the lands thu subdivided should be first offered at public sale. This ordinance was considered, de bated, and amended; and on the 3d of May, 1785, on motion of Mr. Grayson, of Vir ginia, seconded by Mr. Monroe, the size of the townships was reduced to six mile square. It was further discussed until the 20th of May, 1785, when it was finally passed The origin of this system is not known beyond the committee's report. There ha been land surveys in the different colonies for more than a hundred years; still the method of granting land for settlements in vogue in all the colonies was in irregula tracts, except in the colony of Georgia, where, after 1733, eleven townships of 20,00 square acres each were divided into lots of 50 acres each. The act of cession of the State of Virginia of her western territory provided for th formation of States from the same not less than one hundred nor more than one hun dred and fifty miles square. This square form of States may have influenced Mr. Jefferson in favor of a squar form of survey, and besides the even surface of the country was known, the lack o mountains and the prevalence of trees for marking it also favoring a latitudinal an longitudinal system. Certain east and west lines run with the parallels of latitude and the north and south township lines with the meridians. The system as adopted provided for sale in sections of 640 acres, one mile square. I 1820 a quarter-section, or 160 acres, could be purchased. In 1832 subdivisions wer ordered by law into 40-acre tracts or quarter-quarter-sections to settlers, and in 1846 t all purchasers. On May 18, 1796, the ordinance of May 20, 1785, was amended; als on May 10, 1800, on the introduction of land offices and credit sales, and on February 1 1805; April 24, 1820; April 5, 1832; and May 30, 1862. (For existing laws on survey 178 see chapter IX, United States Revised Statutes, "Survey of the public lands," sections 2395 to 2413.) Since the inauguration of the system it has undergone modification in regard to the establishment of standard lines and initial points, the system of parallels or correction lines, as also of guide meridians, having been instituted, contributing largely toward its completeness. SURVEYS OF BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN STATES. Surveys of boundary lines between States are done by special contract under special laws authorizing the same, the Secretary of the Interior awarding the contracts thereunder. Since 1862 the following boundary lines have been run at rates per mile as stated: Oregon and Washington, at $46 per mile Oregon and Idaho, $60 per mile, about.. North boundary of New Mexico, $60 per mile. North boundary of Nebraska, $36 per mile.. North part of east boundary of New Mexico and part of east part of south boundary of Colorado, $40 per mile... Arizona and New Mexico, $70 per mile.. South part of the west boundary of Dakota, $50 per mile. Colorado and Utah boundary, $53 per mile Arkansas and Indian Territory boundary... Aggregate.... The boundary surveys were made by authority of various acts of Congress appropriating money for that purpose from year to year. SURVEYS OF ISLANDS. Surveys of islands and keys on the sea-coast are made by the Coast Survey, under special laws. All other lands of the United States and classes of surveying are done by the surveyors-general and their contract or mineral deputies under direction of the Commissioner of the General Land Office. SURVEYS OF INDIAN RESERVATIONS. Surveys of Indian reservations by the act of April 8, 1864, now devolve upon the General Land Office. Prior to that act the surveys of Indian lands under treaty stiplation were made by direction of the Indian Office. METHODS AND SYSTEM OF LAND PARCELING SURVEYS. Preliminary to surveying a district, a surveying meridian and base line must be et.blished. GEOGRAPHICAL POSITIONS OF THE PRINCIPAL SURVEYING MERIDIANS AND BASE-LINES. Since the adoption of the rectangular system of public surveys, May 20, 1785, twenty-four initial points, or the intersection of the principal bases with surveying Edians, have been brought into requisition to secure the certainty and brevity of description in the transfer of public lands to individual ownership. From the principal |