Shakespeare and the Editorial TraditionStephen Orgel, Sean Keilen Taylor & Francis, 1999 - 418 頁 Shakespeare has never been more ubiquitous, not only on the stage and in academic writing, but in film, video and the populuar press. On television, he advertises everything from cars to fast food; his imagined love life was declared the best movie of 1998; his birthplace, the tiny Warwickshire village of Stratford-Upon-Avon, has been transformed into a theme park of staggering commercialism, and the New globe, in its second season, is already a far bigger business than the old Globe could have ever hoped to be. If popular culture cannot do without Shakespeare, continually reinventing him and reimaging his drama and his life, neither can the critical and scholarly world, for which Shakespeare has, for more than two centuries, served as the central text for analysis and explication, the foundation of the western literary cannon, and the measure of literary excellence. The canonical Shakespeare is a product of publication, commentary, editorial intervention, elucidation, and criticism. The essays collected in these volumes reveal is fully as multifarious as the Shakespeare of theme parks, movies and television, and indeed, is part of the continuing reinvention of Shakespeare. The essays are drawn for the most part from work done in the past three decades, though a few essential, enabling essays from an earlier period have been included; and they not only chart the directions taken by Shakespeare studies in the recent past, but they serve to indicate the enormous and continuing vitality of the enterprise, and the extent to which Shakespeare has become a metonym for literary and artistic endeavor generally. |
內容
Shakespeare and the Arts | 1 |
Shakespeare and Gender | 2 |
Shakespeare and History | 3 |
Shakespeares Poems | 4 |
Shakespeare and the Editorial Tradition | 5 |
Shakespeare and the Interpretive Tradition | 6 |
Shakespeare and the Literary Tradition | 7 |
Shakespeare in the Theatre | 8 |
What Is an Editor? | 117 |
Inventing Shakespeare | 124 |
Editing Shakespeare Today | 144 |
McKerrows Suggestion and TwentiethCentury Shakespeare | 153 |
Repunctuation as Interpretation in Editions of Shakespeare | 179 |
Shakespeares Ghost Writers | 194 |
What? in a names that which we call a Rose | 253 |
The Two Versions of Henry V | 313 |
Political Shakespeare | 9 |
Postmodern Shakespeare | 10 |
Randall McLeod | 60 |
The Authentic Shakespeare | 91 |
The Form of Hamlets Fortunes | 347 |
The Folio Copy for Hamlet King Lear and Othello | 378 |
常見字詞
actors appear argued argument Authentic Shakespeare authorship bad quartos bibliographical Bowers Cambridge century characters claim Clarendon Compositor conflation dramatic E. K. Chambers early editors Elizabethan emendation English essay Essex evidence example facsimile fact Folio text foul papers Gary Taylor ghost Grazia Greg Hamlet hand Henry Henry VI Hinman hypothesis imagined John Keats King Lear letter lines literary study London Macbeth Malone manuscript material McKerrow's omission omitted original Othello Oxford passage Pechter Pembroke's Pembroke's men performance play poem Portia practice Press problem produced promptbook punctuation reader reading reconstruction Renaissance revision Richard Richard III roles Romeo and Juliet Rowe Rowe's scene scribe script seems Shake Shakespearean text Shrew Sonnets speare speech prefixes spelling stage directions Stallybrass Stephen Orgel suggests textual criticism theater theatrical tion tradition Tragedy Troilus Univ variants W. W. Greg Werstine William Shakespeare words writing wrote