"Indeed the Christian Examiner' himself exults in the persua sion that whichever of the two systems may be the best for the prisoner and the community, the 'pecuniary advantages of the Auburn plan will have great attractions for the legislatures of America and that whether it is perfect or not, it is on this account, (if on no other,) much more likely to be adopted than the Pennsylvania system. In other words, according to the Examiner, the great question with American legislatures is, not what system of Penitentiary discipline is most worthy to be adopted by an enlightened, philanthropic, Christian nation, but what will return us the greatest amount in dollars and cents!

"It is the glory of Pennsylvania that she has given such incontrovertible evidence, that she acts on no such sordid principle in the selection of her mode of Penitentiary discipline. It is believed, however, that the advantages of her system, even in this point, are inconsiderably, if at all, behind those of the money-making system which she has seen fit to decline."

In the system that is pursued at Auburn and Sing Sing, it is well known that the prisoners, though they are forbidden to speak to each other, do converse, in whispers, and in signs, and exchange communications also in writing or marks on various materials passing through their hands. They therefore, contract intimacies, if not friendships; their persons become familiar to each other, and their sympathies are constantly drawn into the same channel. The intention or theory of the Auburn plan, is to enforce complete and perpetual silence among persons who work in company with each other; but how different is the practice may be gathered from the following extract :

"The opportunities for intercourse which occur on the Auburn plan, in its most improved modifications, are perfectly obvious. Every march to and from their cells and their work affords such opportunities in abundance. We have often seen their processions

DISREGARD OF DISCIPLINE.

187

in which half the men might be engaged in low conversation for rods, without being heard by any man in authority. Upon the work-bench, at the forge, or anvil, and indeed in almost every part of the establishment, except in the immediate presence and inspection of an officer, facilities of communication abound.

"That such is the fact, I have been assured,' says a visitor, 'by those who have been inmates of the Auburn Penitentiary.' And even in an official report of the commissioners of that Peniten. tiary, to the legislature of New York, in which they speak of the 'admirable discipline' of the Institution, they say in the same breath-We have seen within a few weeks past, notes written on pieces of leather tending to excite insurrection. So far as they can safely venture, they (the prisoners) will be found talking, laughing, singing, whistling, altercating and quarrelling with each other, and with the officers. They will idle away the time in gazing at spectators, and waste or destroy the stock they work upon.' This, be it remembered, is their own account of affairs. And well is it remarked by the British commissioner already cited, that this 'intercourse, however slight and occasional, materially contributes to destroy that feeling of loneliness which is the greatest of all moral punishments, and which absolute and unremitted seclusion cannot fail to inspire.""

One of the certain consequences of this state of things, is that on being released from their confinement, the prisoners recognize each other when they meet in the world-their sympathies as fellowprisoners are awakened-new plans of more successful crime, as they vainly hope, are projectedand every step only plunges them deeper, till they find their way back again to their previous confine

ment.

On the other hand, the Pennsylvania system of complete seclusion in separate cells avoids all this evil; for though two individuals should have been inmates of neighbouring cells, for ever so long a period, there is no chance of their knowing or recog

nizing each other; and of how great an advantage it must be to a man truly resolved on reformation, and desirous of beginning the world anew, not to be known as a previously-convicted criminal wherever he went, must be obvious to the most unreflecting.In confirmation of this view, I will venture to cite two short passages only, from two equally high authorities; the first from Mr. De Toqueville, the French writer, and the second from Mr. Crawford, the English commissioner; and with these I think the evidence will be complete.

66 see no one

"Let the prisoner," says Monsieur De Toqueville, but his keeper, or a minister of the gospel; and let him reflect in his cell, upon his past course, and his future prospects; but that his reflections may not be too intense, give him employment; and he will come out not only a better man, but with the advantage of not having been seen, known, and marked as a convict. It is found by experience, that nothing has a stronger tendency to soften the hard, stubborn, vicious character, than absolute seclusion; and that is precisely the point to be obtained with the convict."

"In judging of the comparative merits of the two systems," says Mr. Crawford, "it will be seen that the discipline of Auburn is of a physical, that of Philadelphia of a moral character. The whip inflicts immediate pain, but solitude inspires permanent terror. The former degrades while it humiliates-the latter subdues, but it does not debase. At Auburn the convict is uniformly treated with harshness, at Philadelphia with civility-the one contributes to harden, the other to soften the affections. Auburn stimulates vindictive feeling-Philadelphia induces habitual submission. The Auburn prisoner, when liberated, conscious that he is known to past associates, and that the public eye has gazed upon him, sees an accuser in every man he meets. The Philadelphia convict quits his cell secure from recognition, and exempt from reproach."

In the careful personal inspection which I was permitted to make of every part of the Penitentiary,

PHILADELPHIA SYSTEM.

189

-in the free and unconstrained intercourse and conversation, which I was allowed to indulge with the prisoners in their separate cells,-and in the long and interesting conversation which I had the privilege to enjoy with the inspectors and warden of the prison, -all the statements I have given in the preceding pages were abundantly confirmed, and all the favourable opinions completely justified. On the whole, therefore, we left the Philadelphia Penitentiary with a conviction that it exhibits one of the most successful experiments that the world has yet seen, for adequately punishing, and at the same time reforming and improving, the criminals committed to its care.

СНАР. Х.

Environs of Philadelphia, and excursions-Wilmington by the river Delaware-History of the state of Delaware-PopulationWhite and coloured races- -Agricultural and pastoral wealthSchool-fund of the State and schools-Principal towns of the State Great canal from the Delaware to the Chesapeake Cemetery at Laurel Hill near Philadelphia-Inclined plane of the Great Western rail-road-Village of Manayunk on the Schuylkill.

THE environs of Philadelphia afford many agreeable excursions to the traveller, provided the weather admit of his enjoying them. During our stay here we possessed that advantage, though the climate embraced every conceivable variety. In our first passing through Philadelphia on our way from New York to Washington, the ice on the Delaware was sixteen inches thick, and the cold was intense. On our return in April it was still cold. During the greater part of May it rained heavily, but there were intervals of fine weather between. In June, the climate appeared more settled, but the heat was excessive; at least, such was its effect on the feelings, though the thermometer never indicated a greater heat than 90° in the shade. In the sun, however, it was often 110°. The suddenness of the changes from heat to cold, and vice versa, were very trying, and sufficiently accounted to us for the complaints made by strangers as to the