 We are of opinion that the judge presiding at the trial was right and that the Supreme Court was wrong. Even if there had been any duty on the part of the Telegraph Company to confine the transmission to North Carolina, it did not do so. The transmission...  Reports of Cases Heard and Determined by the Supreme Court of South Carolina - 第 523 頁South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand 著 - 1921完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | 1920 - 516 頁
...Supreme Court reverses. Chief Justice Holmes concisely and bluntly states the rule as follows: "We are of opinion that the judge presiding at the trial was...states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact. Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 187 US 617, 23 Sup. Ct. 214; 47 L. Ed. 333. The fact must be... | |
 | 1922 - 1202 頁
...relay offices there. This was the route ordinarily used by the company for years. The court said that the transmission of a message through two states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact, and that the fact must be tested by the actual transaction. The court further said that the course... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1922 - 694 頁
...relay offices there. This was the route ordinarily used by the company for years. The court said that the transmission of a message through two States is interstate commerce as a matter of fact, and that the fact must be tested by the actual transaction. The court further said that the course... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1922 - 668 頁
...the State set aside the nonsuit and directed that a judgment be entered on the verdict [1] We are of opinion that the Judge presiding at the trial was...been any duty on the part of the Telegraph Company to conflue the transmission to North Carolina, It did not do so. The transmission of a message through... | |
 | 1922 - 1202 頁
...relay offices there. This was the route ordinarily used by the company for years. The court said that the transmission of a message through two states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact, and that the fact must be tested by the actual transaction. The court further said that the course... | |
 | 1923 - 1214 頁
...were in North Carolina, the telegram was intrastate in character, but the federal Supreme Court said : "The transmission of a message through two states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact. Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 187 US 817 [47 L. Ed. 333, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 214]. The fact... | |
 | Charles Willis Needham - 1925 - 772 頁
...the State set aside the non-suit and directed that a judgment be entered on the verdict. We are of opinion that the judge presiding at the trial was...states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact. Hanky v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 187 US 617. The fact must be tested by the actual transaction.... | |
 | 1920 - 512 頁
...Supreme Court reverses. Chief Justice Holmes concisely and bluntly states the rule as follows: "We are of opinion that the judge presiding at the trial was...states is interstate commerce as a matter of fact. Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 187 US 617, 23 Sup. Ct. 214; 47 L. Ed. 333. The fact must be... | |
| |
