 | William Paley - 1847 - 732 頁
...appears to us, that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant haf better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those... | |
 | 1885 - 544 頁
...added, " that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1870 - 708 頁
...appears to us, that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1864 - 674 頁
...appears to us, that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed m immediate connexion with those from whose negligence... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 頁
...appears to us that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 頁
...be as distinctly foreseen and provided for in the rate of compensation as any others." 4 Mete. 57. " The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | 1905 - 1174 頁
...appears to us that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 頁
...added, " that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
 | 1885 - 544 頁
...it added, "that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence... | |
| |
Besides, it appears to us that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he... 
