網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

Now, Lord Melbourne is held up, by all parties, throughout the correspondence, as the chief adviser and guide in the whole affair. He is therefore answerable for this gross proceeding. Any thing more insulting to the queen's mother, or more unjust to the innocent party accused, cannot be conceived.

But further: Lord Melbourne openly and frankly takes upon himself_the sponsorship of the whole affair. That the only reparation that could be made -that reparation which was signally due to the injured lady and her family, -the dismissal of the male offender,-the ignorant, insolent, brutal slanderer -that this piece of justice, specifically demanded, is still refused, is his act. Even if we suppose, that in so acting he merely panders to royal caprice, that excuse forms no justification. A man of honour, appealed to by a motherand such a mother as the dowager marchioness-for the. merest act of justice, had but one course open to him. A moment's hesitation, even, would have been disgraceful. But he has not merely hesitated,- he has deliberately refused! And, whether as a nobleman, insulting, in cool blood, a lady of higher rank and better blood than his own, or as a man, outraging all gentle and manly feelings; that denial stamps his name with a depth and breadth of disgrace which has had no parallel in modern times. We know the miserable plea that is offered — his duty to his sovereign!-a pretext which gives the last finishing touch to the ignominy. Lord Melbourne, under the pretext of obsequiousness, is betraying his sovereign! What if he, caring little who is court physician, merely falls in with predilections which he finds to exist?-his duty, assuming

as he does to manage both the court and the cabinet, was to offer his sovereign honest and honourable counsel, and to enforce it by his strongest argument his tendered resignation. This was his plain path and duty. By shrinking from it, he may have spared himself and his mistress a momentary uneasiness; but he has extensively injured the queen in the affections of her people, and has irretrievably ruined his own fame.

3. The highest culprit we will not, because we cannot, name. There is an evident determination, throughout the published correspondence, to screen somebody from the just indignation of the irritated relatives of the deceased. We cannot, therefore, fix the charge on any party; and we shall not imitate the original error, by surmising guilt which we cannot prove. Another party, however, it is clear there is, and, shrouded within the innermost precincts of the palace, she still remains. And in this quarter the ultimate and the highest criminality must rest. Sir James Clark was the ready, and unhesitating, and unfeeling instrument; Lord Melbourne the sponsor-almost the bravo, called in to bully and to fight for his employers. But the moving spirit of the whole transaction,the real perpetrator of this deed of slow, ruthless, excruciating, torturing murder, still skulks behind! And there she must remain, we fear, for the present, acting the part of the evil genius of the monarchy. For, if this first specimen is to be taken as a sample of the future, a very few years will suffice to bring the throne of England into about an equality of comfort, strength, and security, with the sister sovereignties of Portugal and Spain !

512 Two Sonnets on a late Soaring Expedition to the Lords. [Oct.1839.

TWO SONNETS ON A LATE SOARING EXPEDITION TO THE LORDS

BY SIR MORGAN O'DOHERTY, BART.

I.

ON SPRING RICE, IN THE CHARACTER OF GANYMEDE.

WHEN, as the poets sing, high-judging Jove,
In plenitude of premiership decreed

To give, with grace, his favourite Ganymede
From earth the lower House - a kindly shove,
In pitchfork fashion, to the House above,

He sent his own brave bird, with hastiest speed,
Upon that noble mission, to proceed:

Down swooping from the sky the eagle drove,
And caught the youth, and upward towered again,
Into Jove's court of peers. As fine a flight

Has Rice, the soaring Superficial, ta'en

At Melbourne's bidding. Therefore doth the wight,
In order that his name should be en règle,

Choose Ganymede as type, and write himself Monteagle.

II.

ON SPRING RICE, IN THE CHARACTER OF DANIEL O'ROURKE,

But not alone to Ganymede in fame

[ocr errors]

Is our up-springing statesman like. Another
Proud hero of romance, an Irish brother
(See Crofty Croker), Dan O'Rourke by name,
Has in his flying match done much the same.
Dan, from a dirty bog where he was sticking,
Bothering and sweating, bungling, blundering, kicking
-A mock to all, a thing of jeer and game-
Mounted an Eagle, and so reached the moon:
So Spring, all floundering in the dismal mas
Of his Exchequer blundering, hailed the boon
Which his Mount-Eagle sent him in distress.
But better Rice than Rourke has done the trick,
Because John Bull, not he, has played the lunatic.
M. O'D.

Chequers, Downing Street, Sept. 29.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small]

"Quæres à nobis, Gracche, cur tantopere hoc homine delectemur? Quia suppeditat nobis, ubi animus ex hoc forensi strepitu reficiatur et aures convicio defossæ conquiescant. An tu existimas aut suppetere nobis posse quod quotidie dicamus in tanta varietate rerum nisi animos nostros doctrinà excolamus? Aut ferre animos tantam posse contentionem, nisi eos doctrinâ eâdem relaxamus? Ego vero fateor me his studiis esse deditum : cæteros pudeat, si qui ita se literis abdiderunt ut nihil possint ex his neque ad communem afferre fructum, neque in aspectum lucemque proferre. Me autem quid pudeat? Qui tot annos ita vixi judices ut ab illis nullo me unquam tempore aut commodum aut otium meum abstraxerit, aut voluptas avocârit aut denique somnus retardàrit."-Quoth Cicero, on behalf of the Poet Archias.

"Furthermore, seeing the lawes are excerpted out of the middle of moral and natural philosophie, how should these fooles have understood it, that have, by G-, studied lesse in philosophie than my mule? In respect of humane learning, and the knowledge of antiquities and history, they were truly laden with those faculties as a toad is with feathers. And yet of all this the lawes are so full, that without it they cannot be understood, as I intend more fully to shew unto you in a peculiar treatise, which on that purpose I am about to publish."- Quoth my master, the good Pantagruel.

CHATEAU BRIAND, -the gentleman born and bred,the scholar, book-read and travel-taught, the enthusiast, with the chivalry of days gone by, the man of

VOL. XX. NO. CXIX.

genius, with the consciousness of the past and present, and the insight vouchsafed to mighty minds of that which is to come,- has declared how

M M

much the world owes, and must ever continue to owe, to those masterspirits whose conquests have been purely intellectual,—to Homer, Dante, Rabelais, and Shakspeare; and has demonstrated, that in the altered state of society no future author can exercise the like power: in other words, that the time for "universal individualities" has for ever passed away. "Those parent-geniuses (he observes) appear to have borne and suckled all the others. Homer fertilised antiquity: Eschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Aristophanes, Horace, Virgil, were his sons. Dante, in like manner, fathers modern Italy, from Petrarch to Tasso. Rabelais created

the literature of

France: Montaigne, Lafontaine, Molière, descend from him. England owes all to Shakspeare. People often deny the authority of these supreme masters: they rebel against them,-enumerate their defects, accuse them of tediousness, prolixity, absurdity, and bad taste, even while robbing them, and decking themselves in their spoils; but they struggle in vain beneath their yoke. Every thing is painted with their colours; every where they stamp their impress. They invent names and words, which have enriched the general vocabulary of nations. Their sayings, their phrases, have become proverbs; their fictitious characters, real persons, who have heirs and lineage: they open horizons whence rush forth floods of light; they sow ideas, the germs of a thousand others; they furnish imagination, subjects, styles, to all the arts. Their works are inexhaustible mines, or the very bowels of the human mind." Of Homer and Shakspeare it is not now my purpose to speak in other than general terms. I am led to say something about Rabelais, his life, and works; and to do so without some allusion to his great compeers would not be desirable, if it were indeed possible. First, a distinction strikes us between the fortunes, in respect to fame, of "the dead kings of melody," and the more mortal men of genius. The glory of Dante and Rabelais is great upon earth; but it is not boundless; it is sensible of climate; it is touched by manners; it is affected by time, and by events. Thus, whilst their works will always, I apprehend, continue to be the sources whence every mark-worthy

be traced, on the other hand, the works of Homer and of Shakspeare must, from their pure essence, for ever exercise an universal influence on the literature of civilised mankind and wherefore so? Because they are unalloyed by any thing of mere mortal clay; because they are not circumscribed by circumstance; because they are not affected by the qualities or conditions of time or place; and because they have within themselves a principle of life and motion, and a power of creation which must preserve them inexhaustible and incorruptible as the ocean floods. From their inscrutable depths all poetry will flow-into their bosom all poetry will ebb, for all generTheir nature may be nearly,

ations.

and in some mark-worthy points best,
described in words attributed to Or-
pheus-words, in my mind, the grand-
est which have ever been addressed to
the cradle and the grave of all things:

Ωκεανόν καλέω πατέρ' ἄφθιτον αἶεν εοντα
̓Αθανάτων τε θιῶν γενεσιν θνητων τ' ἀνθρώ

TWY

Ος περικυμάνει γαίης περι τερμονα κύκλον
Ἐξ οὗπερ παντες ποταμοὶ καὶ πᾶσα θαλάσσα.

proceed to say, in these works of Homer Following forth the simile, I would and of Shakspeare, vast and illimitable to our mental vision as the ocean is to our physical view, there is no touch of individuality-no touch of idiosyncrasy. There is nothing in common between the breathing men and the inspired poems,- no more, at least, than there incapable substances from which, at was between the divine oracles and the his caprice, the king Apollo, god of prophecies, caused them to issue; now from the hosom of an oak, now from the recesses of a cavern, and now from the cold lips of a chiselled stone.

The works, then, of Homer and of Shakspeare may be spoken of without reference to the men by whom they were produced. This cannot be done with respect to Dante and to Rabelais. Hence the distinction. That savour of mortality which connects the dead author with his living book is in no sort to be discovered in the works of the breathed, and it gave life: its mission two mightier masters. The breath was was performed, and it ceased to be; but its creations live, and will live always. With the men Dante and Ra

nortion of their

works died more sunk into oblivion with their generation. The Florentine and the Frenchman, and something, too, of their respective fortunes, were bound up in their works; more, however, in the instance of Dante than of Rabelais. Therefore, he who chose to play the buffoon approaches nearer in the spirit to Homer and to Shakspeare than the author of the Divina Comedia. Dante created as well the language as the literature of his country. His style amongst authors is even as that of the Catholic king, Yo el Rey! His work is not alone Italian,-it is personal : Dante himself it is who sees, encounters, and describes every shape named in his astounding narrative. He has, with a forlorn audacity, seized the pen which dropped from the hand of the apostle. Yet, alas for human nature! we are made to feel that whether, vain mortal! he leads us through Purgatory, Paradise, or Hell, every good and evil passion of his heart is still in Florence, The poem, too, is the most unfeignedly melancholy that was ever yet composed it has the shadow of Dante's life upon it.

**All's cheerless, dark, and deadly!"

Ilis career was one of struggle, labour, unmitigated suffering. The haughty spirit was crushed to the dust. He had felt the bitterness of exile: magnus venerandusque cliens, he had felt the bitterness of the stranger's hospitality; and ob spite of fortune, beyond the imagination of the fervid satirist in the whirlwind of his passion, the descendant of the Frangipani he had stretched forth his hand on the highway, lest he perish, and eaten of the bread of charity. In truth, he passed through life "a man forbid." Love and ambition he had wooed in vain; and even to slake his burning heart in vengeance was denied him. The mortal of divine genius he that should have been honoured as the hero or the demigod, was driven from every shrine and sanctuary, as though he were of the profane herd. Procul, o procul este profani! And he died miserably! Yet, no! Death must have been a release-an ushering to that repose be bad never known on earth. Glory beamed from the poet's brow; but he had preyed upon his own heart. The bitterness was passed: it had been of the olden time; it was long before the

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

not saith

Jeremiah," for the dead; but weep ye sore for him who goeth forth from the place, and returns no more." There is no trace of withering passion or sorrow upon the seventy years of the Frenchman's existence; though he too was a statesman, and a vigorous champion in the lists of theology, where all combats are to the utterance. The sayings and doings of Gargantua and Pantagruel were not more different from the Divina Comedia than the lives of their respective authors. Yet neither is it possible to separate the idea of Rabelais the man from his works. Maître Alcofaribas is always present upon the scene, even though he omit an all hail! such as Beuveurs, très-illustres; et vous Goutteur, très-précieux! No inconsiderable portion of his work (I beg to be understood throughout as alluding to his romance only) has accordingly died with him and his generation, -more, however, with his generation than with him; for, allowing for the local and personal allusions we have lost, Rabelais still lives and plays a part in his own person and character, in all the better passages of the work. His life threw no shadow like to Dante's in its philosophy and its humour, it harmonised with a composition in which there is all manner of inspired wisdom, and a most learnedly libidinous frolic with absurdity, Not in any rage of party, or politics, or religious enthusiasm, or of aught else which might lead the calm and allsufficient mind astray, not in any excess of mental agony, when the soul, crushed by circumstances, renders forth divine emanations, did Rabelais write. And herein was he like to Homer and to Shakspeare, and superior to Dante. The inspiration arising from excitement, originating in or referring to mere self, must always have about it some taint of the earth, earthy." The poet who has never " penned his inspirations" for lack of adequate excitement; the poet (type of a much more numerous class) who, were it not for what the individual man had in this frail world of ours done and suffered, would, peradventure, have had no inspirations at all to pen, are both of an order far inferior to those in whom the principle of philanthropy and beneficence of love (as we apply it to the cherubim) is so strong, that in pouring forth the effusions of their divine

[ocr errors]
« 上一頁繼續 »