網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

240

MATTHEW ARNOLD

POET AND CRITIC

INAUGURAL-DISSERTATION

DER HOHEN

PHILOSOPHISCHEN FAKULTÄT DER UNIVERSITÄT

BERN

ZUR ERLANGUNG DER DOKTORWÜRDE

VORGELEGT VON

ARNOLD SCHRAG
von Wynigen (Bern).

Von der philosophischen Fakultät auf Antrag des Herrn Prof.

Dr. Müller angenommen.

BERN, den 12. Dezember 1903.

Der Dekan: PROF. DR. HAAG,

Basel 1904

FRIEDRICH REINHARDT, UNIVERSITÄTSBUCHDRUCKEREI

St. Albanvorstadt 15

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors][merged small]

I. Introductory Chapter.

1. Indirect influences on Matthew Arnold. Evolution of thought in

England during the first four decades of the nineteenth century:

The Oxford Movement. - Dr. Thomas Arnold opposed to

it. Some of his most prominent qualities that Matthew Arnold
inherited from his father: Dr. Arnold a Liberal in matters
religious and political. Principles of Church Reform.

[ocr errors]

Dr. Arnold's teachers: Coleridge, Carlyle, Wordsworth.
Dr. Arnold on the verge of doubt.

2. Direct influences on Matthew Arnold. His early youth.

M. Arnold at Rugby: Liberal spirit of the school.
spective habits. Short biographical notice up to 1851

-

Intro-

Page

1-16

Religious doubts.

Matthew Arnold the poet of

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

--

2. Strict Science and Religion: Prof. Huxley. Fundamentally,
Arnold agrees with him. In what he differs from the Great
Agnostic: Morality touched with emotion. The Bible a book
of poetry.
A very precious one. New definition of God:
The Eternal Not-ourselves that makes for righteousness.
Proved by the teaching of the Prophets of Jesus of

St. Paul,

[ocr errors]

Criticism. Too individual, want of a general scientific basis.
Too severe on dogmas. Here again, want of historic sense.
Absence of logic. Objections raised by Martineau.
Arnold's and Martineau's views compared with those of Prof.
Seeley.

Summing up: Ethical idealism

IV. The Literary Critic.

[ocr errors]

The French critics his models. The new method: milieu, individual. Biography. Literary criticism in England before Matthew Arnold. Dr. Johnson. Carlyle did not take the final step. Proof. The Reviews; too personal After 1840, low standard of literary

and too abstract.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Page

56-69

Subjects

A first-rate stylist.

Little practices.

69-88

Bibliography

89-94

In the closing pages of his Histoire de la littérature anglaise M. Taine calls our attention to a great change actually at work in England, a revolution entering, not by sudden inundation, but by slow infiltration. He is thinking of the growing influence of those ideas which have been collected under the much abused term: the Spirit of the Age. If by Spirit of the Age we understand the fresh current of ideas brought about by that marvellous development of scientific method and research in all the domains of knowledge during the nineteenth century, then surely we must accord a prominent position in the history of English thought to Matthew Arnold. Numerous are the passages in the works of this modern writer in which allusion is made to the Zeitgeist. Whatever verdict may be given on Matthew Arnold's application of modern thought to new rules of social and religious life, it remains certain that he sincerely endeavoured to grasp the leading ideas of his time and that he undertook the by no means enviable part of an apostle of these very ideas.

In order to arrive at an impartial and in some measure decisive criticism of Matthew Arnold's work, we must first trace out the evolution of the spirit of the age and thus try to discover the sources of original currents in Arnold's teaching. In so far as these currents also reflect the author's individuality, they can only be explained by our applying the laws of heredity and utilising biography.

Thomas Arnold, the father of Matthew Arnold, was born on June 13th 1795, at West Cowes, in the Isle of Wight. As a child he was early imbued with a love of Nature. The stirring events of the French Revolution probably left a lasting impression on his mind. His father was collector of customs. In 1807 Thomas was sent to Winchester, where he remained till 1811. In this year he was elected as a scholar at Corpus Christi College, Oxford. In 1815 he was elected Fellow of Oriel and was thus admitted into a circle of men whose names will for ever be Schrag, Matthew Arnold.

1

« 上一頁繼續 »