PENDING INDIAN CLAIM CASES, DEC. 31, 1975—Continued
[Explanation of symbols: The letter "x" marks the phase or phases in which the case is pending before the Commission. The letter "c" indicates that the case is consolidated with one or more other cases. The letter "b" indicates that the case is in the post-trial briefing stage. The letter "s" indicates that the case is submitted to the Commission for its decision]
283-B Mohave, et al. General accounting and trespass x damage claims. The Commission's decision of July 10, 1975, on plaintiffs' motion to compel a proper accounting and for determination of points of law and defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensation for resources removed from plaintiffs' aboriginal lands by trespassers prior to extinguishment of aboriginal title ruled on several issues and requires, inter alia, that defendant supplement its accounting in certain respects. The Commission's decision of Aug. 28, 1975, on plaintiffs' motion for recon- sideration and amendment of the decision of July 10, 1975, invites plaintiffs to allege their trespass claim by a more definite statement or by an amended petition and denied without prejudice defendant's motion to dismiss this claim. Pursuant to a pretrial order of Aug. 27, 1975, the parties are briefing the issue of whether the "Proceeds of Townsites" account represents the proceeds of sales of "Indian trust lands" within the meaning of the act of Apr. 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 70).
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, et. al. General accounting claim relating to funds and other properties. Some accounting issues have been decided, others are in process of being framed. The Commission's decision of Aug 13, 1975, denied a motion by defendant to dismiss plaintiff's exceptions to defendant's accounting numbered 8 and 9, which are concerned with obtaining information needed to determine the accuracy of computations of interest on plaintiffs' funds, and requires defendant to supply the needed information. The defendant's time for complying with this requirement has been extended through Apr. 12, 1976. Navajo. The plaintiff's petition asserts accounting. claims relating to: (1) royalties on coal removed from plaintiff's reservation under leases negotiated by defendant for production of coal, (2) lumber and lumber products from plaintiff's reservation sold under contracts negotiated by defendant, (3) royalties on vanadium removed from reservation land under leases negotiated by defendant for production of vandium, and (4) stone, sand and gravel from plaintiff's reservation sold under contracts negotiated by defendant. Proceeding in consolidation with dockets 69 and 353. See comments under docket 69, above. 300-A... Stockbridge and Munsee. Claim relating to lands.
sold to State of New York under 15 separate transactions. After an interlocutory decision on liability issues, proceedings were stayed pending outcome of an appeal to the Court of Caims in the Oneida case in docket 301 involving identical issues. The decision on that appeal, handed down on May 11, 1973, made necessary a further trial of liability issues in docket 300-A. The case is submitted to the Commission for its decision on those issues.
301 Oneida Nation of New York, et al. 8 claims arising xs from New York land sales are asserted in plaintiffs' petition. Claims 1 and 2 relating to land sales prior to enactment of the Trade and Intercourse Act of July 1790, are proceeding separately from claims 3 through 7 involving land sales after the 1790 act. The 8th claim in plaintiffs' petition was dismissed on Jan. 16, 1974. Claims 1 and 2 are submitted to the Com- mission for its decision on liability issues. Claims 3 through 7 are submitted to the Com- mission for its decision on liability issues remanded by the Court of Claims that were the subject of a trial before the Commission during May 1974.
See footnotes at end of table.
PENDING INDIAN CLAIM CASES, DEC. 31, 1975—Continued
[Explanation of symbols: The letter "x" marks the phase or phases in which the case is pending before the Commission. The letter "c" indicates that the case is consolidated with one or more other cases. The letter "b" indicates that the case is in the post-trial briefing stage. The letter "s" indicates that the case is submitted to the Commission for its decision]
Potawatomi, Citizen, et al. Land claim.
Potawatomi, Citizen, et al. On appeal in the Court of Claims from decision on land title issues in this and 10 other consolidated cases. Potawatomi, Citizen, et al. See comments under docket 15-N, above.
Peoria, Kaskaskia. A portion of this claim was dis- missed by the Commission's decision on land title issues in this and 14 other consolidated cases. The remaining part of the case is sub- mitted to the Commission with other consoli- dated cases for the Commission's decision on valuation and consideration issues.
Peoria, Wea. Land claim.
Peoria, Wea. Land claim. Set for trial of value and consideration issues with other consolidated cases on June 21, 1976.
Kickapoo, Kansas. Land claim.
Quechan. After trial and briefing of land title x issues, plaintiff moved for dismissal of its petition without prejudice on the ground that there was no perfected taking of the land in- volved. Defendant requests that the motion be denied unless dismissal be with prejudice. Further proceedings await administrative determinations by the Secretary of the Interior in respect to the plaintiff's claim of present ownership of the land.
326-A..... Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone of Nevada. General accounting case pending before the Court of Claims on cross appeal from the Commission's interlocutory decision of Oct. 4, 1973, on issues regarding defendant's liability funds.
326-C... Shoshone-Bannock. General accounting case on appeal before the Court of Claims from the Commission's order of Jan. 16, 1974, in respect to defendant's liability for interest on certain trust funds of the plaintiff.
326-K... Western Shoshone Identifiable Group, represented by Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians. Land claim. Pending before the Court of Claims on an appeal from the Commission's decision of Feb. 20, 1975, dismissing a petition for stay of proceedings and lea ve to present an amended claim by a group calling itself the Western Shoshone Legal Defense and Education Asso- ciation and Frank Temoke. When the said petition was filed, the Commission was in the process of adjudicating the defendant's claim for offsets against an interlocutory award of $26,154,600 on the Western Shoshone aboriginal land claim in this case.
332-C. Sioux, Yankton, Being briefed by the parties on x c land valuation issues tried during April 1975. Set for trial on Jan. 20, 1976, with docket 74 (Sioux Nation) on remanded issue of apportionment between the Teton and Yankton Sioux divisions of the Fort Laramie Treaty lands, Also set for trial on Mar. 9, 1976, on issues involved in de- fendant's claim for offsets against any award to the plaintiff.
See footnotes at end of table.
PENDING INDIAN CLAIM CASES, DEC. 31, 1975-Continued
[Explanation of symbols: The letter "x" marks the phase or phases in which the case is pending before the Commission. The letter "c" indicates that the case is consolidated with one or more other cases. The letter "b" indicates that the case is in the post-trial briefing stage. The letter "s" indicates that the case is submitted to the Commission for its decision]
332-D... Sioux, Yankton. Claims for an accounting for the period commencing July 1, 19751, and of the proceeds of sale of plaintiff's reservation lands under an 1892 agreement. Orders of the Commission in this case on Nov. 20, 1975, require the plaintiff to show cause why its claim for an accounting by the defendant with respect to its administration of plaintiff's money and property after June 30, 1951, should not be dismissed, and, in respect to plaintiff's claim for an accounting of defendant's administration of the proceeds paid the plaintiff under the 1892 agreement, require the defendant to file with the Commission and serve on the plaintiff by Mar. 19, 1976, a full and complete supplemental accounting setting forth the purposes for which all disbursements were made from the Yankton Sioux fund during the period beginning Aug. 15, 1894, and ending Aug. 14, 1919, and reciting the authority under which said disbursements were made. The plaintiff has asked for an extension of time through Feb. 5, 1976, within which to respond to the show cause order. Shawnee. Before the Supreme Court on petition of Claims decision affirming decision on land title issues in this and 12 other consolidated cases.
Delaware, Absentee, et al. Before the Supreme Court on petition for review of Court of Claims decision on land title issues in this and 12 other consolidated cases.
341-C... Seneca-Cayuga. On appeal in the Court of Claims from, inter alia, dismissal order, and decision on land title issues in this and 9 other consolidated
341-D... Seneca-Cayuga. On appeal in the Court of Claims from, inter alia, dismissal order, and decision on land title issues in this and 10 other consolidated cases.
342-G..... Seneca Nation. Primarily a general accounting case relating to rents and profits accruing from a great many leases of Seneca lands to railroads and other private parties. The Commission under- stands that a settlement offer by the plaintiff is under consideration by the defendant.
343... Seneca-Cayuga. On a remanded question of whether the Federal Government had knowledge of the land cession treaties involved in this case between the Indians and the State of New York the Commission determined, in its decision in this case dated Mar. 27, 1975, that the Federal Government had actual advance notice of the treaties. Negotiations between the parties for settlement of remaining issues are in progress. Papago. Aboriginal land claim submitted to the Commission for its decision on valuation issues. A settlement proposal that has been agreed upon by counsel for the parties has been submitted to the Attorney General for his approval. 350-C... Three Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold Reserva- tion. A hearing on a compromise settlement of this case and the case in docket 350-D is set for Jan. 30, 1976.
Three Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold Reserva- tion. Claim arising from exchange of reservation lands. A hearing on a compromise settlement of this case and the case in docket 350-C is set for Jan. 30, 1976.
See footnotes at end of table.
PENDING INDIAN CLAIM CASES, DEC. 31, 1975-Continued
[Explanation of symbols: The letter "x" marks the phase or phases in which the case is pending before the Commission. The letter "c" indicates that the case is consolidated with one or more other cases. The letter "b" indicates that the case is in the post-trial briefing stage. The letter "s" indicates that the case is submitted to the Commission for its decision]
350-G... Three Affiliated Tribes of Fort Berthold Reservation. Claim for general accounting of funds and other properties. Some issues have been disposed of, others are in process of being framed. The Commission's opinion and interlocutory order of May 29, 1975, required defendant to supplement its accounting for funds and other properties in certain respects, granted plaintiff summary judgment for amounts claimed under certain of its exceptions to the defendant's accounting reports and for lost interest on balances of certain funds, dismissed plaintiff's exception arising from construction of the Garrison Dam Reservoir project in North Dakota and the related flooding of plaintiff's reservation, and required plaintiff to show cause why certain other of its exceptions or parts of exceptions to defendant's accounting should not be dismissed. The Commission's opinion and order of Dec. 18, 1975, on responses to the show cause order dismissed all of the plaintiff's exceptions and parts of exceptions to which the show cause order was directed except an exception concerned with labor allegedly required illegally of the plaintiff tribes.
Aleut Community of St. Paul Island. In 1973 the x Court of Claims affirmed the Commission's dis- missal of all claims in this case and in another Aleut case in docket 369, except the plaintiff's claims for breach of fair and honorable dealings, and remanded both dockets to the Commission for further proceedings on the latter claims. On July 18, 1975, the Commission, acting on plain- tiff's motion under docket 369, severed a claim of the Aleut Community of St. George Island from docket 369 and consolidated that claim for trial in docket 352. Counsel for the parties are preparing for trial in both dockets on whether the United States breached its obligations and, if so, the damages thereby sustained by the plain- tiffs. It is the present expectation of counsel for the parties that they will be prepared for a formal pretrial conference in March 1976, and for trial in docket 352 in May 1976. The trial in docket 369 will be held after the trial in docket 352.
Navajo. Claim for an accounting under oil and gas leases of reservation lands negotiated by the defendant prior to Aug. 13, 1946. Proceeding in consolidation with other Navajo accounting claims in dockets 69 and 299. See comments above under docket 69 regarding the 3 dockets. 354 Pueblo of San Ildefonso. Land, interest and general x7 accounting claims. The Commission's determi- nations in respect to lands held by aboriginal title and dates of extinguishment of such title were affirmed by the Court of Claims on Apr. 16, 1975. Pending on plaintiff's motion of Nov. 10, 1975, for a rehearing on the Commission's order of Feb. 10, 1971, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its claim for interest on certain money paid belatedly under the Pueblo Lands Act of 1924. Defendant's time for respond- ing to this motion has been extended through Jan. 25, 1976, Plaintiff's exceptions to defend- ant's accounting are awaited. The parties expect to be able to agree upon a compromise settle- ment of all claims in this case after the appeals under docket 357-A involving interest issues are finally disposed of.
See footnotes at end of table.
PENDING INDIAN CLAIM CASES, DEC. 31, 1975-Continued
[Explanation of symbols: The letter "x" marks the phase or phases in which the case is pending before the Commission. The letter "c" indicates that the case is consolidated with one or more other cases. The letter "b" indicates that the case is in the post-trial briefing stage. The letter "s" indicates that the case is submitted to the Commission for its decision]
Pueblo of Santo Domingo. Same comment as under x7 docket 354, above. On Nov. 26, 1975, the Com- mission granted plaintiff's motion of July 25, 1975, for a rehearing in respect to the eastern boundary of the Santo Domingo aboriginal title area and ordered counsel for the parties to appear for a conference on Jan. 12, 1976, to discuss whether a trial will be necessary to determine the true eastern boundary of the aboriginal title area. On defendant's motion, which mentioned, inter alia, negotiations for settlement of this case, the conference setting of Jan. 12 was vacated by the Commission's order of Dec. 23, 1975, which order requires the attorneys for the parties to advise Commissioner Yarborough by Jan. 30, 1976, as to the outcome of further settlement negotiations referred to in defendant's motion.
356. Pueblo of Santa Clara. Same comment as under X7
Pueblo of Taos. Land and general accounting claims. The parties expect to be able to agree upon a compromise settlement of this case after the appeals under docket 357-A are finally disposed of. To be tried on land valuation issues at same time as dockets 354, 355, 356, and 358 if the parties in those dockets and 357 are unable to reach compromise settlements of valuation issues. Plaintiff's exceptions to defendant's accounting are awaited.
357-A..... Pueblo of Taos. Claim arising from an alleged 5th amendment taking of 926 acres of plaintiff's land in the town of Taos, N. Mex. On cross appeals in the Court of Claims from the Com- mission's interlocutory award of $297,684.67, plus interest thereon at 5 percent per annum from Mar. 17, 1927, until the date payment is made, and related determinations. The parties expect to be able to negotiate a compromise settlement of this case after the appeals are finally disposed of.
358 Pueblo of Nambe. Same comment as under docket 354, above. To be tried on land valuation issues X7 at same time as dockets 354, 355, 356 and 357 if the parties in those dockets and 358 are unable to reach compromise settlements of valuation issues. Lower Sioux Indian Community, in Minnesota, et al. The 1st claim in plaintiffs' amended petition in this case, a claim for additional compensation for tribal land in Minnesota relinquished to the defendant under an 1858 treaty, was concluded with a final award of $66,940 dated July 25, 1967. What amount to claims under 3 counts are asserted under the 2d,claim in the amended petition. Of these claims the 1 in count 2, a claim for just compensation for Devils Lake Reserva- tion lands of the Sisseton and Wahpeton Bands, was concluded with a final award dated Feb. 27, 1974, which, with interest to date of payment as provided in the Commission's award order, amounted to $8,473,221.26. Claims in 2 counts (of the 2d claim in the amended petition) remain in docket 363, they are: See footnotes at end of table.
« 上一頁繼續 » |