图书图片
PDF
ePub

'CHAP.

III.

Jacob Beb

men.

nature, or the macrocosm, and that of man, or the microcosm; so that what was known in one might lead us to what was unknown in the other.* Fludd possessed, however, some acquaintance with science, especially in chemistry and mechanics; and his rhapsodies were so far from being universally contemned in his own age, that Gassendi thought it not unworthy of him to enter into a prolix confutation of the Fluddian philosophy.t

20. Jacob Behmen, or rather Boehm, a shoemaker of Gorlitz, is far more generally familiar to our ears than his contemporary Fludd. He was however much inferior to him in reading, and in fact seems to have read little but the Bible and the writings of Paracelsus. He recounts the visions. and ecstasies during which a supernatural illumination had been conveyed to him. It came indeed without the gift of transferring the light to others for scarce any have been able to pierce the clouds in which his meaning has been charitably presumed to lie hid. The chief work of Behmen is his Aurora, written about 1612, and containing a record of the visions wherein the mysteries of nature were revealed to him. It was not published till 1641. He is said to have been a man of great goodness of heart, which his writings display; but, in literature, this cannot give a sanction to the incoherencies of madness. His language, as far as I

*This was a favourite doctrine of Paracelsus. Campanella was much too fanciful not to embrace it. Mundus, he says, habet spiritum qui est cœlum, crassum corpus quod est terra, sanguinem qui

est mare. Homo igitur compen-
dium epilogusque mundi est. De
Sensu Rerum, l. ii. c. 32.
+ Brucker, iv. 691.
iii. 157.

Buble,

have seen any extracts from his works, is coloured with the phraseology of the alchemists and astrologers; as for his philosophy, so to style it, we find, according to Brucker, who has taken some pains with the subject, manifest traces of the system of emanation, so ancient and so attractive; and from this and several other reasons, he is inclined to think the unlearned shoemaker of Gorlitz must have had assistance from men of more education in developing his visions.* But the emanative theory is one into which a mind absorbed in contemplation may very naturally fall. Behmen had his disciples, which such enthusiasts rarely want; and his name is sufficiently known to justify the mention of it even in philosophical history.

21. We come now to an English writer of a different class, little known as such at present, but who, without doing much for the advancement of metaphysical philosophy, had at least the merit of devoting to it with a sincere and independent spirit the leisure of high rank, and of a life not ob scure in the world,-Lord Herbert of Cherbury. The principal work of this remarkable man is his Latin treatise, published in 1624, “On Truth as it is distinguished from Revelation, from Probability, from Possibility, and from Falsehood." Its object is to inquire what are the sure means of discerning and discovering truth. This, as, like other authors, he sets out by proclaiming, had been hitherto done by no one, and he treats both ancient and modern philosophers rather haughtily, as being men tied to particular opinions, from which they dare not

* Brucker, iv. 698.

CHAP.

III.

Lord HerVeritate.

bert De

III.

CHAP. depart. "It is not from an hypocritical or mercenary writer, that we are to look for perfect truth. Their interest is not to lay aside their mask, or think for themselves. A liberal and independent author alone will do this."* So general an invective, after Lord Bacon, and indeed after others, like Campanella, who could not be charged with following any conceits rather than their own, bespeaks either ignorance of philosophical literature, or a supercilious neglect of it.

His axioms.

22. Lord Herbert lays down seven primary axioms. 1. Truth exists: 2. It is coeval with

3. It exists every5. There are as

the things to which it relates:
where: 4. It is self-evident:†
many truths, as there are differences in things:
6. These differences are made known to us by our
natural faculties: 7. There is a truth belonging to
these truths: "Est veritas quædam harum veri-
tatum." This axiom he explains as obscurely, as
it is strangely expressed. All truth he then dis-
tinguishes into the truth of the thing or object, the
truth of the appearance, the truth of the percep-
tion, and the truth of the understanding. The
truth of the object is the inherent conformity of
the object with itself, or that which makes every
thing what it is. The truth of appearance is the

* Non est igitur a larvato aliquo vel stipendioso scriptore ut verum consummatum opperiaris: Illorum apprime interest ne personam deponant, vel aliter quidem sentiant. Ingenuus et sui arbitrii ista solummodo præstabit auctor. Epist. ad Lectorem.

+ Hæc veritas est in se manifesta. He observes that what are

called false appearances, are true as such, though not true according to the reality of the object: sua veritas apparentiæ falsæ inest, verè enim ita apparebit, vera tamen ex veritate rei non erit.

Inhærens illa conformitas rei cum seipsa, sive illa ratio, ex qua res unaquæque sibi constat.

conditional conformity of the appearance with the object. The truth of perception is the conditional conformity of our senses (facultates nostras prodromas) with the appearances of things. The truth of understanding is the due conformity between the aforesaid conformities. All truth therefore is conformity, all conformity relation. Three things are to be observed in every inquiry after truth; the thing or object, the sense or faculty, and the laws or conditions by which its conformity or relation is determined. Lord Herbert is so obscure, partly by not thoroughly grasping his subject, partly by writing in Latin, partly perhaps by the "sphalmata et errata in typographo, quædam fortasse in seipso," of which he complains at the end, that it has been necessary to omit several sentences as unintelligible, though what I have just given is far enough from being too clear.

The

CHAP.

III.

of truth.

23. Truth, he goes on to say, exists as to the Conditions object, or outward thing itself, when our faculties are capable of determining every thing concerning it; but though this definition is exact, it is doubtful whether any such truth exists in nature. first condition of discerning truth in things, is that they should have a relation to ourselves; (ut intra nostram stet analogiam) since multitudes of things may exist which the senses cannot discover. The three chief conditions of this condition seem to be: 1. That it should be of a proper size, neither immense, nor too small; 2. That it should have its determining difference, or principle of individuation, to distinguish it from other things; 3. That

CHAP.
III.

Instinctive truths.

it should be accommodated to some sense or per-
ceptive faculty. These are the universally neces-
sary conditions of truth (that is of knowledge) as
it regards the object. The truth of appearance
depends on others, which are more particular; as
that the object should be perceived for a sufficient
time, through a proper medium, at a due distance,
in a proper situation.*
Truth of perception is
conditional also, and its conditions are, that the
sense should be sound, and the attention directed
towards it. Truth of understanding depends on
the κοιναι εννοιαι, the common notions possessed by
every man of sane mind, and implanted by nature.
The understanding teaches us by means of these,
that infinity and eternity exist, though our senses
cannot perceive them. The understanding deals
also with universals, and truth is known as to
universals, when the particulars are rightly appre-
hended.

24. Our faculties are as numerous as the differences of things; and thus it is, that the world corresponds by perfect analogy to the human soul, degrees of perception being as much distinct from one another as different modes of it. All our powers may however be reduced to four heads; natural instinct, internal perception, external sensation, and reason. What is not known by one of these four means, cannot be known at all. Instinctive truths are proved by universal consent. Here he

* Lord Herbert defines appearance, icetypum, seu forma vicaria rei, quæ sub conditionibus istis cum prototypo suo conformata, cum conceptu denuo sub conditi

onibus etiam suis, conformari et modo quodam spirituali, tanquam ab objecto decisa, etiam in objecti absentia conservari potest.

« 上一页继续 »