ePub 版

A confusion of values is likely to take place when we try to “do something" for American literature. It is an object that appeals to the uplifter who is anxious to "get results." But the difficulty is that if a piece of writing is literature, it does not need to be uplifted. If it is not literature, it is likely to be so heavy that you can't lift it. We have been told that a man by taking thought cannot add a cubit to his stature. It is certainly true that we cannot add many cubits to our literary stature. If we could we should all be giants.

When literary men discourse with one another about their art, they often seem to labor under a weight of responsibility which a friendly outsider would seek to lighten. They are under the impression that they have left undone many things which they ought to have done, and that the public blames them for their manifold transgressions.

That Great American Novel ought to have been written long ago. There ought to be more local color and less imitation of European models. There ought to have been more plain speaking to demonstrate that we are not squeamish and are not tied to the apron strings of Mrs. Grundy. There ought to be a literary center and those who are at it ought to live up to it.

In all this it is assumed that contemporary writers can control the literary situation.

Let me comfort the over-strained consciences of the members of the writing fraternity. Your responsibility is not nearly so great as you imagine.

Literature differs from the other arts in the relation in which the producer stands to the consumer. Literature can never be made one of the protected industries. In the drama the living actor has a complete monopoly. One might express a preference for Garrick or Booth, but if he goes to the theater he must take what is set before him. The monopoly of the singer is not quite so complete as it once was. But until canned music is improved, most people will prefer to get theirs fresh. In painting and in sculpture there is more or less cc.npetition with the work of other ages. Yet even here there is a measure of natural protection. The old masters may be admired, but they are expensive. The living artist can control a certain market of his own.

There is also a great opportunity for the artist and his friends to exert pressure.

When you go to an exhibition of new paintings, you are not a free agent. You are aware that the artist or his friends may be in the vicinity to observe how First Citizen and Second Citizen enjoy the masterpiece. Conscious of this espionage, you endeavor to look pleased. You observe a picture which outrages your ideas of the possible. You mildly remark to a bystander that you have never seen anything like that before.

“Probably not,” he replies, “it is not a picture of any outward scene; it represents the artist's state of mind."

“Oh,” you reply, “I understand. He is making an exhibition of himself.”

It is all so personal that you do not feel like carrying the investigation further. You take what is set before you and ask no questions.

But with a book the relation to the producer is altogether different. You go into your library and shut the door, and you have the same sense of intellectual freedom that you have when you go into the polling booth and mark your Australian ballot. You are a sovereign citizen. Nobody can know what you are reading unless you choose to tell. You snap your fingers at the critics. In the "tumultuous privacy" of print you enjoy what you find enjoyable, and let the rest go.

Your mind is a free port. There are no customs house officers to examine the cargoes that are unladen. The book which has just come from the press has no advantage over the book that is a century old. In the matter of legibility the old volume may be preferable, and its price is less. Whatever choice you make is in the face of the free competition of all the ages. Literature is the timeless art.

Clever writers who start fashions in the literary world should take account of this secrecy of the reader's position. It is easy enough to start a fashion; the difficulty is to get people to follow it. Few people will follow a fashion except when other people are looking at them. When they are alone they relapse into something which they enjoy and which they find comfortable.

The ultimate consumer of literature is therefore inclined to take a philosophical view of the contentions among literary people about what seem to them the violent fluctuations of taste. These fashions come and go, but the quiet reader is undisturbed. There are enough good books already printed to last his life-time. Aware of this, he is not alarmed by the cries of the "calamity howlers" who predict a famine.

From a purely commercial viewpoint, this competition with writers of all generations is disconcerting. But I do not see that anything can be done to prevent it. The principle of protection fails. Trades-unionism offers no remedy. What if all the living authors should join in a general strike! We tremble to think of the army of strike-breakers that would rush in from all centuries.

From the literary viewpoint, however, this free competition is very stimulating and even exciting. To hold our own under free trade conditions, we must not put all our thought on increasing the output. In order to meet the free competition to which we are exposed, we must improve the quality of our work. Perhaps that may be good for us.



Eloquent in its simplicity, sincere in its tone, true in its characterization, and purposeful in its effect, this sketch written by William Allen White on the day of his daughter's burial and printed in the Emporia Gazette the following day thoroughly reveals his outstanding characteristics as a writer and a man. Those characteristics have made the editor of a small town newspaper a national, if not an international, figure both in letters and in politics. Mr. White, born in Emporia, a Kansas town of ten thousand, educated at the University of Kansas, found in his Middle West environment inspiration and material for sketches, short stories, and novels that have caused his literary power to be widely recognized. The Court of Boyville, with its illuminating episodes of small town life, the forceful A Certain Rich Man, deemed one of the best of America's novels, In Our Town, with its relevation of human nature, together with The Real Issues and Other Stories, Stratagem and Spoils, The Old Order Changeth, God's Puppets, and in the Heart of a Fool reveal his ability to deal convincingly with homely material.

He does not confine his attention entirely to those things near to him. Events and men of national and international import are viewed by him with such a clearness of vision and discussed with such an independent courage, yet withal in a fine spirit of fairness and tolerance, that his opinions are valued throughout the nation and have brought him distinguished honors, not the least of which was appointment as a representative of the United States at the Russian Conference at Prinkipos in 1919.

Though honors have come to him, he remains as thoroughly a resident of Emporia as any of its citizens, a man among his neighbors, loyal, sympathetic, human, friendly.

The Associated Press reports carrying the news of Mary White's death declared that it came as the result of a fall from a horse.

horse. How she would have hooted at that! She never fell from a horse in her life. Horses have fallen on her and with her—“I'm always trying to hold

1 Published in the Emporia Gazette. Reprinted through the courtesy of the editor, William Allen White.

« 上一頁繼續 »