 ... a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts and circumstances connected with the matters stated In his direct examination. If he wishes to -examine him as to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own, and...  The American Jurist and Law Magazine - 第 458 頁1843完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1854 - 780 頁
...examination of a witness; and that if the cross-examining party wishes to examine the witness as to other matters, he must do so by making the witness...calling him as such in the subsequent progress of the case (1 Greenl. Ev. part 3, ch. 3, sec. 445, p. 562.) The fifth bill of exceptions presents the question... | |
 | Hawaii. Office of the Attorney General - 1846 - 710 頁
...now considered by the Supreme Court of the United States to be well established, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts...with the matters stated in his direct examination; and that, if he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1847 - 710 頁
...better than nothing." The rule as to what cross-questions may be put is this, to wit: a party bas no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts...with the matters stated in his direct examination. — 14 Peters1 Rep. 448-461. It is true that a party may call a witness, and if he does not examine... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 756 頁
...per Abbott, J. ; R. r. Murphy, 1 Ann. Mac. & Og. 206, per Pennefather, CJ Court, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts...with the matters stated in his direct examination ; and that, if he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so hy making the witness his own,... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1852 - 988 頁
...favour of the party putting the question. F»rmers' Bank v. Strohicker, 9 Watts, 183. A party has no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts...other matters, he must do so by making the witness bis own ; and calling him as such, in the subsequent progress of the cause. A party cannot, by his... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 600 頁
...Mich. 67, 71, 81, 83, and is a misapplication of the rule there laid down, namely: "That a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts...with the matters stated in his direct examination; and that if he wishes to examine him as to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own,... | |
 | 1854 - 868 頁
...established, although sometimes lost sight of in our loose practice at trials, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts...his direct examination. If he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own, and calling him, as such, in the subsequent... | |
 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1883 - 658 頁
...now considered by the Supreme Court of the United States to be well established, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts and circumstances connected with matters stated in his direct examination, and that if he wishes to examine him as to other matters... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1856 - 614 頁
...established, although sometimes lost sight of in our loose practice at trials, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts...his direct examination. If he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own, and calling him, as such, in the subsequent... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1858 - 708 頁
...alleged in the indictment; 2. That the indictment did not charge two distinct offences. A party has no right to cross,examine any witness, except as to facts and circumstances connected with tho matters stated in his direct examination. When a question is put to a witness, which is collateral... | |
| |
