« 上一頁繼續 »
« Si quid novisti rectius iftis, “ Candidus imperti; fi non, his utere mecum.”
* Mr. Pope told me himself, that the “ Essay on « Criticism” was indeed written in 1707, though said 1709 by mistake.
The Poem is in one book, but divided into three prin
cipal parts or members. The first (to ver. 201.] gives rules for the Study of the Art of Criticism; the fecond [from tience to ver. 560.] exposes the Causes of wrong judgment; and the third [froin thence to the end) anarks out the Morals of the Critic. When the Reader hath well considered the whole, and hath observed the regularity of the plan, the masterly conduet of the several parts, the penetration into Nature, and the compass of learning so conspicuous throughout, he shculd then be told that it was the work of an Author who had not attained the twentieth year of his age.--A very learned Critic has shewn, that Horace had the same attention to inethod in his Art of Poetry
NTRODUCTION. That 'tis as great a fault to judge
ill, as to write ill, and a more dangerous one to the
public, ver. 1.
That a true Taste is as rare to be found as a true Ge-
nius, ver. 9 to 18. That most men are born with some Taste, but spoild
by false Education, ver. 19 to 25. The multitude of Critics and causes of them, ver. 26
That we are to study our own Taste, and know the limits
of it, ver. 46 to 67.
Nature the best guide of judgment, ver. 68 to 87.
Improved by Art and Rules, which are but methodized
Nature, ver. 88.
Rules derived from the practice of the Ancient Poets,
ver. 88. to ITO.
That therefore the Ancients are necessary to be studied
by a Critic, particularly Homer and Virgil, ver. 120
Of Licences, and the use of them by the Ancients, ver.
140 to 18o. Reverence due to the Ancients, and praise of them, &c.
PART II. Ver. 203, &c.
Causes hindering a true Judgment. 1. Pride, ver. 208.
Imperfect Learning, ver. 215. 3. Judging by
parts, and not by the whole, ver. 233 to 288. Cri-
tics in Wit, Language, Versification, only, 288, 305,
4. Being too hard to please, or too apt
to admire, ver. 384. 5. Partiality--too much love
to a Sect, to the Ancients or Moderns, ver. 394.
6. Prejudice or Prevention, ver. 408. 7. Singularity,
ver. 424. 8. Inconstancy, ver. 430. 9. Party Spi-
rit, ver. 452, &c. 10. Envy, ver. 466. Against
Envy, and in praife of Good-nature, ver. 508, &c.
When Severity is chiefly to be used by Critics, ver.
PART III. Ver. 560, &c.
Rules for the Conduct of Manners in a Critic. I. Can-
dour, ver. 563. Modesty, ver. 566. Good-breed-
ing, ver. 572. Sincerity and Freedom of Advice,
ver. 578. 2. When one's Counsel is to be restrained,
ver. 584. Character of an incorrigible Poet, ver.
600. And of an impertinent Critic, ver. 610, &c.
Character of a good Critic, ver. 629. The History
of Criticism, and Characters of the best Critics :
Aristotle, ver. 645. Horace, ver. 653. Dionysius,
ver. 665. Petronius, ver. 667. Quintilian, ver.
670. Longinus, ver. 675. Of the Decay of Criti.
cism, and its Revival. Erafmus, ver. 693. Vida,
ver. 705. Boileau, ver. 714. Lord Roscommon,
&c. ver. 725. Conclusion.
IS hard to say, if greater want of skill
Appear in writing or in judging ill;
But of the two, less dangerous is th' offence
To tire our patience, than mislead our sense,
Some few in that, but numbers err in this,
Ten censure wrong for one who writes amiss ;
A fool might once himself alone expose,
Now one in verse makes many more in prose.
'Tis with our judgments as our watches; none
Go juft alike, yet each believes his own.
In Poets as true genius is but rare,
True taste as seldom is the Critic's share,
Both must alike from Heaven derive their light,
These born to judge, as well as those to write.
Le such teach others who themselves excel, 15
And censure freely who have written well.
Authors are partial to their wit, 'tis true,
But are not Critics to their judgment too?
Yet, if we look more closely, we shall find
Moft have the seeds of judgment in their mind :