 It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are In the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in other...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - 第520页作者：Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890全本阅读 - 图书信息
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 812 页
...been held that the employees need be engaged in the same common work at the same time. It seems to be sufficient if they are in the employment of the same...performing duties and services for the same general purpose. See Hoar v. Merritt, 62 Mich. 386 (29 NW 15) ; Caniff v. Navigation Co., 66 Mich. 638 (33... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 页
...or particular work. It is Slattery's Adm'r and Others v. The Toledo and Wabash Railroad. enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes,... | |
 | 1888 - 556 页
...constitute fellow-servants, the employees need not be at the same time engaged in the same particular work. It is sufficient if they are in the employment of...in the same common work, and performing duties and servive* for the same general purpose. The rule is the same, although the one injured may be inferior... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1873 - 780 页
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules seem to have been laid down with care, after due consideration, to... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 页
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules £eem to have been laid down with care after due consideration, to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 738 页
...injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1876 - 854 页
...sufferer and the one who causes the Injury should be at the time engaged in tha same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...common work and performing duties and services for tha same general purposes, the master is not liable. " But CHURCH, C. J ., in delivering the opinion... | |
 | William Wait - 1878 - 1004 页
...sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they are in the employment of the same master,...duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. JLaning v. New York Central R. R. Co., 49 NY (4 Sick.) 521, 528 ; SC, 10 Am.... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 页
...operation or particular work ; that It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes ; or, in... | |
 | 1906 - 1122 页
...same operation or particular work. It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are In the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes, or, in... | |
| |
