« 上一頁繼續 »
a most agreeable pleasure-voyage, which I have tried to commemorate in the Introduction to the new edition of the “ Pirate," I visited, in social and friendly company, the coasts and islands of Scotland, and made myself acquainted with the localities of which I meant to treat. But this
other effect so delightful, was in its conclusion saddened by one of those strokes of fate which so often mingle themselves with our pleasures. The accomplished and excellent person who had recommended to me the subject for “ The Lay of the Last Minstrel,” and to whom I proposed to inscribe what I already suspected might be the close of my poetical labours, was unex. pectedly removed from the world, which she seemed only to have visited for purposes of kindness and benevolence. It is needless to say how the author's feelings, or the composition of his trifling work, were affected by a circumstance which occasioned so many tears and so much sorrow.? True it is, that “ The Lord of the Isles” was concluded, unwillingly and in haste, under the painful feeling of one who has a task which must be finished, rather than with the ardour of one who endeavours to perform that task well. Although the Poem cannot be said to bave made a favourable impression on the public, the sale of fifteen
[See a note to the lines superscribed “Pharos loquitur," included in volume 1st; and see also “ Fragments of a Tour in the Hebrides,” &c., printed in the Edinburgh Annual Register for 1812.]
[Harriet, Duchess of Buccleuch, died 24th August, 1814. Sir Walter Scott received the mournful intelligence while visiting the Giant's Causeway, and immediately returned home.]
thousand copies enabled the author to retreat from the field with the honours of war.
In the meantime, what was necessarily to be considered as a failure, was much reconciled to my
feelings by the success attending my attempt in another species of composition. “Waverley” had, under strict incognito, taken its flight from the press, just before I set out upon the voyage already mentioned: it had now made its way to popularity, and the success of that work and the volumes which followed, was sufficient to have satisfied a greater appetite for applause than I have at any time possessed.'
I may as well add in this place, that, being much urged by my intimate friend, now unhappily no more, William Erskine, (a Scottish judge, by the title of Lord Kinedder,) I agreed to write the little romantic tale called the “ Bridal of Triermain;" but it was on the condition, that he should make no serious effort to disown the composition, if report should lay it at his door. As he was more than suspected of a taste for poetry, and as I took care, in several places, to mix something which might resemble (as far as was in my power) my friend's feeling and manner, the train easily caught, and two large editions were sold. A third being called for, Lord Kinedder became unwilling to aid any longer a deception which was going rather farther than he expected or desired, and the real author's name was given. Upon another occasion, I sent up another of these trifles, which, like schoolboy's kites, served to show how the wind of popular taste was setting. The manner was supposed to be that of a rude minstrel, or Scald, in
*[The first edition of Waverley appeared in July, 1814.]
opposition to the “Bridal of Triermain," which was designed to belong rather to the Italian school. This new fugitive piece was called "Harold the Dauntless;" 1 and I am still astonished at my having committed the gross error of selecting the very name which Lord Byron had made so famous. It encountered rather an odd fate. My ingenious friend, Mr. James Hogg, had published, about the same time, a work called the “Poetic Mirror," containing imitations of the principal living poets. There was in it a very good imitation of my own style, which bore such a resemblance to “ Harold the Dauntless,” that there was no discovering the original from the imitation; and I believe that many
ho took the trouble of thinking upon the subject, were rather of opinion that my ingenious friend was the true and not the fictitious Simon Pure. Since this period, which was in the year 1816, the Author has not been an intruder on the public by any poetical work of importance.
ABBOTSFORD, April, 1830.
*[“ Harold the Dauntless" was first published in a small 12mo volume, December, 1816.]
' [Mr. Hogg’s “ Poetic Mirror” appeared in October, 1816.]