XXXIV. Plaintiff's agreement in writing with a corporation
that it should have his "shop rights" on a certain
process in the weighting of silk, kept secret by him,
the process to remain his property, held to be a
license and not a sale, and the compensation re-
ceived therefor taxable income and not realization
upon capital. Kaltenbach, 570.
XXXV. The allowance for obsolescence among the deductions
provided for in section 214 (a) of the revenue act
of 1921, is in connection with property that is sub-
ject to exhaustion, wear, and tear, and where a
secret process is not so subject deduction for its
becoming obsolete is not proper. Kaltenbach, 581.
XXXVI. A corporation which had theretofore used the calendar
year as its accounting period and made its income-
tax returns accordingly was not under the law re-
quired to change its income-tax return to the fiscal
year used by the parent company in making a con-
solidated excess-profits tax return, viz, ending June
30, 1917, and having properly made a return of its
income for the calendar year ending December 31,
1917, was entitled to assessment upon that basis.
Clinchfield Navigation Co., 589.
XXXVII. A corporation organized in the United States, doing
business in Porto Rico, having properly paid its 2
per cent income tax for the year 1917, imposed by
sec. 10, revenue act of 1916, to the treasurer of Porto
Rico, was under no obligation to pay the same tax
to the Government of the United States (sec. 23,
ib.). The 4 per cent additional tax imposed by sec.
4, war revenue act of 1917, was payable by the cor-
poration to the United States Government, section
5 of the war revenue act of 1917 merely abolishing
the provisions of section 23 of the revenue act of
1916 with respect to administration of the law, the
collection of taxes, and payment of same into the
Porto Rican treasury. Ponce & Guayama R. R. Co.,
596.
XXXVIII. Social club; membership dues. Abbott, 603.
XXXIX. Contributions for religious, charitable, etc., purposes
are not deductible under the income-tax laws in the
returns of corporations, nor are such deductions al-
lowable under the guise of "ordinary and necessary
expenses," although the corporation was benefited by
such contributions. Sweet, Inc., 654.