 ... a party has no right to cross-examine any witness except as to facts and circumstances connected with the matters stated in his direct examination.  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - 第 420 頁Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, John Worth Kern, Francis Marion Dice, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy 著 - 1856完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | 1843 - 530 頁
...evidence for any other purpose not then suggested to the court. Ib. 10. (Cross examination.) A party has a right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts...his direct examination. If he wishes to examine him on other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own ; and calling him as such, in the subsequent... | |
 | Hawaii. Office of the Attorney General - 1846 - 710 頁
...says: " The rule is now considered by the Supreme Court of the United States to be well established, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness,...with the matters stated in his direct examination; and that, if he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1847 - 710 頁
...was better than nothing." The rule as to what cross-questions may be put is this, to wit: a party bas no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to...with the matters stated in his direct examination. — 14 Peters1 Rep. 448-461. It is true that a party may call a witness, and if he does not examine... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 756 頁
...Brydges, 2 Stark. R. 314, per Abbott, J. ; R. r. Murphy, 1 Ann. Mac. & Og. 206, per Pennefather, CJ Court, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness,...with the matters stated in his direct examination ; and that, if he wishes to examine him to other matters, he must do so hy making the witness his own,... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1852 - 988 頁
...answer operate in favour of the party putting the question. F»rmers' Bank v. Strohicker, 9 Watts, 183. A party has no right to cross-examine any witness,...his direct examination. If he wishes to examine him on other matters, he must do so by making the witness bis own ; and calling him as such, in the subsequent... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1862 - 600 頁
...People v. Horton, 4 Mich. 67, 71, 81, 83, and is a misapplication of the rule there laid down, namely: "That a party has no right to cross-examine any witness...with the matters stated in his direct examination; and that if he wishes to examine him as to other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own,... | |
 | 1854 - 868 頁
...the pertinency or relevancy of the evidence for any other purpose not then suggested to the Court. A party has no right to cross-examine any witness,...his direct examination. If he wishes to examine him on other matters, he must do so by making the witness his own ; and calling him as such, in the subsequent... | |
 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1883 - 658 頁
...445,) that the rule is now considered by the Supreme Court of the United States to be well established, that a party has no right to cross-examine any witness...except as to facts and circumstances connected with matters stated in his direct examination, and that if he wishes to examine him as to other matters... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1854 - 684 頁
...the pertinencv or relevancy of the evidence for any other purpose not then suggested to the Court. A party has no right to cross-examine any witness, except as to facts and circumstance! connected with the matters stated in his direct examination. If he wishes to examine... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1858 - 708 頁
...sufficiently alleged in the indictment; 2. That the indictment did not charge two distinct offences. A party has no right to cross,examine any witness,...except as to facts and circumstances connected with tho matters stated in his direct examination. When a question is put to a witness, which is collateral... | |
| |
