« 上一頁繼續 »
SIR WALTER SCOTT, BART.
THIS MYSTERY OF CAIN
BY HIS OBLIGED FRIEND,
AND FAITHFUL SERVANT,
The following scenes are entitled “ a Mystery,” in conformity with the ancient title annexed to dramas upon similar subjects, which were styled “ Mysteries, or Moralities.” The author has by no means taken the same liberties with his subject which were common formerly, as may be seen by any reader curious enough to refer to those very profane productions, whether in English, French, Italian, or Spanish. The author has endeavoured to preserve the language adapted to his characters; and where it is (and this is but rarely) taken from actual Scripture, he has made as little alteration, even of words, as the rhythm would permit. The reader will recollect that the book of Genesis does not state that Eve was tempted by a demon, but by “ the Serpent;" and that only because he was " the most subtil of all the beasts of the field.”: Whatever interpretation the Rabbins and the
Fathers may have put upon this, I must take the words as I find them, and reply with Bishop Watson upon similar occasions, when the Fathers were quoted to him, as Moderator in the Schools of Cambridge, “ Behold the Book !”-holding up the Scripture. It is to be recollected that my present subject has nothing to do with the New
Testament, to which no reference can be here made without anachronism. With the poems upon similar topics I have not been recently familiar. Since I was twenty, I have never read Milton ; but I had read him so frequently before, that this may make little difference. Gesner's " Death of Abel” I have never read since I was eight years of age, at Aberdeen. The general impression of my recollection is delight; but of the contents I remember only that Cain's wife was called Mahala, and Abel's Thirza.- In the following pages I have called them “ Adah” and “ Zillah,” the earliest female names which occur in Genesis ; they were those of Lamech's wives : those of Cain and Abel are not called by their names. Whether, then, a coincidence of subject
may have caused the same in expression, I know nothing, and care as little.
The reader will please to bear in mind (what few choose to recollect) that there is no allusion to a future state in any of the books of Moses, nor indeed in the Old Testament. For a reason for this extraordinary omission he may consult 66 Warburton's Divine Legation ; ” whether satisfactory or not, no better has yet been assigned. I have therefore supposed it new to Cain, without, I hope, any perversion of Holy Writ.
With regard to the language of Lucifer, it was difficult for me to make him talk like a Clergyman upon the same subjects; but I have done what I could to restrain him within the bounds of spiritual politeness.
If he disclaims having tempted Eve in the shape of the Serpent, it is only because the book of Genesis has not the most distant allusion to any thing of the kind, but merely to the Serpent in his serpentine capacity.
Note.—The reader will perceive that the author has partly adopted in this poem the notion