 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1853 - 732 頁
...case rests upon the question whether there was error in the proceedings. The appeal was dismissed upon the ground that it was not taken within the time limited by the act. But it is insisted by this petitioner that he was, during that time, within the saving clause... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court, George Greene (Reporter) - 1858 - 646 頁
...from the date of judgment. From Lee District Court. Opinion by KINNKY, .1. Motion made in this case to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within a year, as notice was not served on appellee within Jvat time. The Code § 1978, requires appeals to... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 頁
...judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. In the Common Pleas the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within thirty days (the time prescribed by the statute) from the rendition of the judgment by the justice.... | |
 | Charles Patrick Daly - 1870 - 604 頁
...date affixed to it, the justice would have to return upon the appeal according to the fact, and if a motion is made to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it was not brought within twenty days after the judgment bears date, the appellant, in answer to that motion,... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1901 - 614 頁
...involved in that case from the questions under consideration in the case at bar. In that case a motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the time required by law. The court having jurisdiction to decide the issues raised by the motion, its decision... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1901 - 630 頁
...than six months after the motion for a new trial was overruled. The defendant now moves this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the time required by law. McCARTY, District Judge, after stating the facts delivered the opinion of the court.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 686 頁
...made. An appeal to this court was taken from the judgment on the 20th day of July, 1909. A motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. On authority of the case of Hunsaker v. Harris (just decided) 109 Pac. 1, 37 Utah, 226, the... | |
 | 1900 - 1164 頁
...Involved In that case from the questions under consideration In the case at bar. In that case a motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that It was not taken within the time required by law. The court having Jurisdiction to decide the issues raised by the motion, Its decision... | |
 | 1912 - 1170 頁
...conditioned for the payment of the costs if the report should be affirmed. The district court dismissed the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the time allowed by the statute, and Anderson appeals from the order of dismissal. The statute involved reads... | |
 | 1910 - 1150 頁
...made. An appeal to this court was taken from the judgment on the 20th day of July, 1909. A motion was made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. On authority of the case of Hunsaker v. Harris (just decided) 109 Рас. 1, the motion is... | |
| |
Motion is made to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it was not taken within the time limited by law for appealing. The act governing the subject provides that an appeal from an order or decree of the orphans... 
