Declaration of War: A Survey of the Position of Belligerents and Neutrals with Relative Considerations of Shipping and Marine Insurance During WarStevens and sons, limited, 1889 - 488 頁 |
其他版本 - 查看全部
常見字詞
abandonment adjudication Admiralty affreightment appear Arnould's Insce assured barratry Belligerent Rights Blatch blockaded port breach Britain British subject carry circumstances claim claimants clause condemnation confiscation connexion consequence contraband contraband of war contract convoy crew cruiser damages decided Declaration of Paris deemed despatches destination domiciled effect embargo enemy property engaged entitled fact flag France Franco-Prussian war freight French held hostilities ibid illegal infra intention law of nations letters of marque liable licence Lord Lord Ellenborough Majesty's Majesty's Government marine master Matamoras ment naval neutral port neutral vessel obligation offence outbreak owner papers Peterhoff pre-emption principle privateer Prize Courts prohibited ransom recaptured regarded respect right of visit risk Russian sailing salvage Scott seized seizure ship and cargo shipowner Stephen Hart supra tion total loss trade treaty underwriters United Vide sub visit and search void voyage warlike warranty whilst
熱門章節
第 366 頁 - A neutral Government is bound— " First. To use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping within its jurisdiction of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace...
第 68 頁 - ... arrests, restraints, and detainments of all kings, princes, and people, of what nation, condition, or quality soever, barratry of the master and mariners, and of all other perils, losses, and misfortunes, that have or shall come to the hurt, detriment, or damage of the said goods and merchandises, and ship, &c, or any part thereof.
第 181 頁 - Majesty shall judge capable of being converted into, or made useful in increasing the quantity of, military or naval stores...
第 212 頁 - That the penalty for the violent contravention of this right is the confiscation of the property so withheld from visitation and search. For the proof of this I need only refer to Vattel, one of the most correct and certainly not the least indulgent of modern professors of public law.
第 106 頁 - The neutral flag covers enemy's goods, with the exception of contraband of war; 3. Neutral goods, with the exception of contraband of war, are not liable to capture under enemy's flag; 4. Blockades, in order to be binding, must be effective — that is to say, maintained by a force sufficient really to prevent access to the coast of the enemy.
第 237 頁 - The truth may not always be discernible, but when it is discovered, it is according to the truth and not according to the fiction that we are to give to the transaction its character and denomination. If the voyage from the place of lading be not really ended, it matters not by what acts the party may have evinced his desire of making it appear to have ended.
第 68 頁 - Touching the adventures and perils which we the assurers are contented to bear and do take upon us in this voyage: they are of the seas, men of war, fire, enemies, pirates, rovers, thieves, jettisons, letters of mart and countermart, surprisals, takings at sea, arrests, restraints, and detainments of all kings, princes, and people, of what nation, condition, or quality soever...
第 269 頁 - State shall and may, during and notwithstanding the present hostilities with Russia, freely trade with all ports and places wheresoever situate, which shall not be in a state of blockade, save and except that no British vessel shall under any circumstances whatsoever, either under or by virtue of this Order, or otherwise, be permitted or empowered to enter or communicate with any port or place which shall belong to or be in the possession or occupation of Her Majesty's enemies.
第 79 頁 - Warranted free from capture and seizure and the consequences of any attempt thereat.
第 355 頁 - Court has long been established, that such illegal augmentation is a violation of the Law of Nations, as well as of our own Municipal Laws, and as a violation of our Neutrality, by analogy to other cases, it infects the captures subsequently made with the character of torts, and justifies and requires a restitution to the parties who have been injured by the misconduct. It does not lie in the mouth of wrong-doers to set up a title derived from a violation of our Neutrality.