搜尋 圖片 地圖 Play YouTube 新聞 Gmail 雲端硬碟 更多 »
登入
書籍 書目1 - 10,共 64 頁;搜尋條件:The authorities establish beyond all question this: that neither party, witness,...
" The authorities establish beyond all question this: that neither party, witness, counsel, jury, nor judge, can be put to answer civilly or criminally for words spoken in office... "
A Practical Guide, to the Quarter, and Other, Sessions of the Peace: Adapted ... - 第 47 頁
William Dickinson 著 - 1815 - 463 頁
完整檢視 - 關於此書

A Practical Guide to the Quarter Sessions and Other Sessions of the Peace ...

William Dickinson - 1820 - 901 頁
...jury ; " for Lord Mansfield, on a motion to quash an indictment against a Justice of the Peace for using such words, is reported to have said as follows:..." it must be a very strong case indeed, with very Jiagrant proof s of corruption, in which the court would grant an information against Judges acting...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

A Practical Guide to the Quarter Sessions, and Other Sessions of the Peace ...

William Dickinson, Sir Thomas Noon Talfourd - 1829 - 709 頁
...had addressed the grana jury as "a seditious, scandalous, corrupt, and perjured jury," that a judge of record cannot be put to answer civilly or criminally, for words spoken in office, (j) This, however, may well be doubted where the words, though spoken in the seat of office, and during...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

The Justice of the Peace and Parish Officer, 第 2 卷

Richard Burn, Joseph Chitty, Thomas Chitty - 1831
...and perjured jury." Lord Mansfield, CJ, said : Neither party, witness, counsel, jury, or judge, can be put to answer, civilly or criminally, for words spoken in office. If the words spoken are opprobrious or irrelevant to the case, the Court will take notice of them as...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Dickinson's Guide to the Quarter Sessions and Other Sessions of the Peace ...

William Dickinson - 1841 - 1110 頁
...unprecedented. Lord Mansfield is reported to have said, " Neither party, witness, counsel, jury, nor judge, can be put to answer civilly or criminally for words spoken in office. If the words spoken are opprobrious, or irrelevant to the case, the court will take notice of them...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Reports of Cases Argued and Ruled at Nisi Prius: In the Courts of Queen's ...

Frederick Augustus Carrington, Joshua Ryland Marshman - 1843 - 726 頁
...kind, to give them till next term to find any." " Neither party, witness, counsel, jury, or judge can be put to answer civilly or criminally for words spoken in office. If the words spoken are opprobrious or irrelevant to the case, the Court will take notice of them as...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Dickinson's Guide to the Quarter Sessions: And Other Sessions of the Peace

Sir Thomas Noon Talfourd - 1845 - 1157 頁
...unprecedented. Lord Mansfield is reported to have said, " Neither party, witness, counsel, jwy, nor judge, can be put to answer civilly or criminally for words spoken in office. If the words spoken are opprobrious, or irrelevant to the case, the court will take notice of them...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Irish Chancery Reports: Being a Series of Reports of Cases Argued and ...

Ireland. High Court of Chancery - 1861
...defendant's Counsel) "has said ia "very just; neither party, witness, counsel, jury, or judge, can be " put to answer, civilly or criminally, for words spoken in office." In Hodgson v. Scarlett (a), the point decided by the Court was, that an action for defamation would...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Queen's Bench: And ...

William Mawdesley Best, George James Philip Smith - 1863
...Mansfield, in delivering their judgment, said : "Neither party, witness, counsel, jury, or Judge, can be put to answer, civilly or criminally, for words spoken in office." Manisty (Aspinall with him) in support of the declaration. — [Cochlmrn C. 3. What do you say to the...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Queen's Bench: And ...

Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, William Mawdesley Best, George James Philip Smith - 1863
...Mansfield, in delivering their judgment, said : "Neither party, witness, counsel, jury, or Judge, can be put to answer, civilly or criminally, for words spoken in office." Manisty (Aspinall with him) in support of the declaration. — \_Cockburn CJ What do you say to the...
完整檢視 - 關於此書

The Albany Law Journal: A Monthly Record of the Law and the Lawyers, 第 38 卷

1889
...observed in /«'ii, v. Skinner, Lofft, 56, that "neither party, witness, counsel, jury nor judge can be put to answer civilly or criminally for words spoken in office." Some refined distinctions were subsequently ingrafted on this doctrine, but they have been swept away,...
完整檢視 - 關於此書




  1. 我的圖書館
  2. 說明
  3. 進階圖書搜尋
  4. 下載 ePub 版
  5. 下載 PDF