 | United States. Supreme Court - 1837 - 696 頁
...commerce, within the sense of the constitution, may mean intercourse, and the power to • regulate it be co-extensive with the subject on which it acts, and...cannot be stopped at the external boundary of a state, according to the language of this Court in the case of Brown v. The State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 44G... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 頁
...in which it was declared to be complete in itself, and to acknowledge no limitations other than are prescribed by the constitution. The power is coextensive...boundary of a state, but must enter its interior. We deem it unnecessary now to reason in support of these propositions. Their truth is proved by facts... | |
 | William Alexander Duer - 1843 - 436 頁
...the power of Congress is coextensive with the subject on which it acts. It cannot, in either case, be stopped at the external boundary of a state, but must enter the limits, and be exercised within the territorial jurisdiction of all the states. The grant of Congress,... | |
 | 1845 - 436 頁
...the power of Congress is coextensive with the subject on which it acts. It cannot, in either case, be stopped at the external boundary of a state, but must enter the limits, and be exercised within the territorial jurisdiction of all the states. The grant of Congress,... | |
 | 1827 - 452 頁
...in which it was declared to be complete in itself, and to acknowledge no limitations other than arc prescribed by the constitution. The power is co-extensive...boundary of a state, but must enter its interior. We deem it unnecessary now to reason in support of these propositions. Their truth is proved by facts... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 550 頁
...Congress. Congress was vested by the Constitution with authority to regulate commerce between the States. The power is co-extensive with the subject on which it acts, and cannot be stopped, as had already been decided in Gibbons vs. Ogden, at the external boundary of a State, but must enter... | |
 | Richard Peters - 1860 - 836 頁
...419; 6 Cond. Rep. 555. 1 1 . The power to regulate commerce, given to congress by the constitution, is coextensive with the subject on which it acts;...boundary of a state, but must enter its interior. If the power reaches the interior of a state, and may be there exercised, it must be capable ci' authorizing... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - 1864 - 824 頁
...in which it was declared to be complete in itself, and to acknowledge no limitations other than are prescribed by the constitution. The power is coextensive...boundary of a State, but must enter its interior. We deem it unnecessary now to reason in support of these propositions. Their truth is proved- by facts... | |
 | 1896 - 866 頁
...the case. Relying upon Gibbons v. Ogden for the basic proposition that the power to regulate commerce ''is co-extensive with the subject on which it acts,...boundary of a State, but must enter its interior," he puts forward from this point another outpost of nationalism, and establishes as an enduring proposition... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1887 - 460 頁
...that intercourse." In Brown v. The Stale of Maryland, 12 Wheaton 419, Chief Justice Marshall said: "The power is co-extensive with the subject on which...boundary of a State, but must enter its interior." And in the Passenger Cases, 7 Howard 283., the court, in speaking of the same power, say, " It extends... | |
| |
It is co-extensive with the subject on which it acts and cannot be stopped at the external boundary of a State, but must enter its interior... 
