網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

fhepherds ufed to mark their names
on cattle. Virgil fays that the Hind
Aut pecori fignum, aut numeros im-
prefit acervis.

And Calphurnius ftill more plainly
Impreffurus coi tua nomina.

The honour of the invention, however, is due to the moderns. And its extenfive influence in literature is too generally felt, to require proof. Every fociety, even the lowest members of it, now enjoy, in confequence of the art of Printing, many privileges and many conveniences, which were formerly circumfcribed within a very narrow compaís, being confined to the learned or the great.

Such revolution has Printing occafioned in the republic of letters, that probably we thall never again relapfe into barbarifm. A barrier againft ignorance is now fixed, which nothing, perhaps, will be able to demolith. All the knowledge of our forefathers, which we at prefent poffefs, as repofited in the books tranf

mitted to us from ancient times, we have the power of fecuring to ourfelves and to pofterity. Such is the infinite multiplication of copies, that compofitions which are once made public, may be, for ever, circulated; and continually re-edited in fresh impreffions, may mock even the power of time itself-may brave all the artifices of deftruction. We might almoft imagine, that Ovid had written these triumphant lines, with a prophetic view to this glorious inven

tion:

Thefe confident hopes, apparently fo romantic, could only, perhaps, be realized by Printing.

Whilft then, we poffefs an art fo univerfally useful, let us be fenfible of its real value; and take care not to debase it, by rendering it the vehicle of frivolity or corruption.

Let us turn it to the purposes of genuine fcience; and rejoice in our opportunities unpoffeft by former times, of diffeminating our knowledge our virtue.

and

I have already fhewn our equality, at leaft, with the ancients, in refpect to Philology and Science. Nor will it be less eafy to prove, that we are ftandard of morality. In both points, not degenerated from the ancient indeed, I would maintain our fuperiority over former times. All, however, I flatter myself, will, at length, concur with me in opinion, that the complaint of our degeneracy is un

founded and weak.

If we look to the vices of former

times, they will appear, as I take it, than the vices of thefe latter days. more enormous, if not more general,

I fhall not go back to the infancy of the world for a view of large and populous cities, where scarcely any righteous perfons were to be found: I fhall not mark them abandoned to

the most unnatural crimes, and drawwere we only to glance over the hifing down deftruction from on high. the nations as God's peculiar people, al-tory of the Jews, a race felected from we should be fufficiently fhocked by every fpecies of barbarity and profli gacy. Though under the immediate direction of God, they were incredulous, obftinate, and cruel. They were repeatedly guilty of inceft, of fratricide, of parricide: And in their punishments (fuch as fawing men afunder) they betrayed a most brutal difpofition.

Famque opus exegi, quod nec Jovis ira

nec ignis, Nec poterit ferrum, nec edax aholère vetufias.

-Nomenque erit indelebile nof

trum;

Quaque patet domitis Romana potentia
terris,
Ore legar populi! Sc.

The cruelties of the Jews are hardly equalled by the inhumanity of the thirty Athenian tyrants, who, having

flain a vast number of citizens, obliged the daughters of the murdered to dance in the blood of their parents. Nor are the Jewish people exceed ed by the moderns in extravagance. It is well known, that the Ifraelitish Ladies were accustomed to powder their hair with gold duft.

We find many of the Romans committing the most favage outrages. Even to revenge a trivial jeft, Antoninus Caracalla put all the citizens of Alexandria to the fword, and razed the city to the ground.

The Romans, in many inftances, combined the deepest treachery with all the wantonnels of cruelty. The punica fides might well be retorted on themselves. The perfidy of Servius Galba, who affembling together the inhabitants of three cities in Spain, under the pretence of confulting their common fafety, cut off feven thousand at a stroke; or of Licinius Lucullus, who, in violation of exprefs articles, maffacred twenty thousand of the Caucæi, can fcarce be paralleled in modern times. The mild Auguftus himfelf was guilty of the greatest e. normities. It is well known, that on taking the city of Perufium, he offered up as a facrifice to the manes of his uncle Julius, three hundred of the principal citizens. Have we ever had occafion to execrate fuch living characters, as thofe of Nero or Domitian? Are not the ten perfecutions fo pregnant with barbarity, that the history of them feems incredible to the moderns?

If fuch then were the cruelties of the Greeks and Romans, muft not imagination recoil from the immanity of the nations around them? How can we form an adequate idea of these, whom the Greeks and Romans filed Barbarians-On a general view of their morality, the Barbarians were not more barbarous. The beftiality of the German Women, in throwing their infants at the faces of the Roman foldiers, to damp the ardor of

ambition and of victory, by the most terrifying fpectacles inhumanity could exhibit, is even more defenfible than the outrages I have already mentioned.

As to other vices, that characterised these two politer people, the licentious communication of the fexes, we know, was pretty generally countenanced.

The crimes of Sodom was openly avowed in Greece: And an excess of drinking was fo frequent there, that pergracari implied the frenzy of drunkennefs. We are told (though 'tis hardly to be credited) that Cyrus, preparing to attack his brother Artaxerxes, published a manifefto, in which he afferted his fuperior claim to the throne of Perfia,because he could: fwallow the moft wine. Is it poffible, that fo fhameless a manifefto could be published by a modern Prince?

For thefe vices, the Roman people, alfo, were notorious-ad diurnam ftellam matutinam potantes, from Plautus to Seneca; the latter of whom affirmed, that the women even exceeded the men.

With refpect to the prodigality and luxury of the ancients, we have numerous inftances unequalled by our wildest exceffes-our most delicate refinements in voluptuoufnefs. We are told by Plutarch, that Alexander spent twelve millions of talents upon the funeral of Hephæftion. And, for the extravagance of the Emperor Heliogabalus, what Prince on earth can now pretend to rival him?-Hiftorians inform us, that, while his fishponds were filled with rofe-water, his lamps furnished with the balfam that diftills from the Arabian groves

his dining-room ftrewed with faffron, and his porticoes with gold-duft, he had every day new vellments of the richest filk, or woven gold!

[ocr errors]

If it be faid, that though not fo extravagant, we are yet more volup tuous than the ancients, I would only look to the Roman luxuries at Baie

to

[ocr errors]

among his fubjects. To render the body robuft and active, to the extinction almost of the mind, was the fole object of the Spartan legiflator.

to obviate fo frivolous an objection, ry fpecies of mental improvement, he -There are fome, who may pretend, fuffered no form of literature to exist that I have been all this while collecting a few vices, as they are thinly fcattered over the face of the ancient world; that I have beenunfairly bringing into view the more prominent irregularities of men, to the degradation of the fpecies, and to the confufion of hiftorical truth. But this I deny. I have brought forward the vices that have characterised whole ages and nations. The best ages of Greece and Rome will fhrink from a comparison with modern times.

[ocr errors]

In Greece, the common people were fubjected to fuch a legislation and fuch a religion, that their brighteft morals were stained with impurities. The applauded virtues of the Spartan common-wealth, are blended with glaring imperfection. The laws of Lycurgus, fo repeatedly the theme of oratorical panegyrick, are little elfe than a mass of corruption. They are founded in falfe and vicious principles. They hold forth abfurdities, which would fhock the good sense of a modern legiflator. Among a variety of other barbarities, they directed the expofure, and confequently, the deftruction of fuch children as were born too delicate or weak, for the military functions of a Spartan. The Spartans in fact were foldiers, not men. Their law-giver feems to have viewed the one as contradistinguished from the other; fince in the warlike character, which confifted in triumphing over the tendernefs of nature, and confronting death with favage resolution, he hath funk all the virtues and affections of humanity. From the cultivation of the gentler paffions he was fo utterly averfe, that he banished all the humanizing arts; left they fhould foften the bofom into benevolence, or excite the focial fympathies, or kindle thofe charities of father, fon, and brother, which he diligently laboured to extinguish. Hoftile indeed, to eve

2

The boys, therefore, were taken away, at a very early age, from their parents; and inured, under the care of the ftate, to hardships, and difficulties, and dangers. They were taught to bear the feverest extremities of heat and cold, hunger and thirft, with patience and tranquillity. And, merely with a view of exertifing or hardening their bodies, werę often beat in fo mercilefs a manner, that they expired under the whip: And (what wonderfully proves the force of habit) they have been known, in fuch fituations, to expire without a groan. Thus then, all natural affection between parents and children was deftroyed or precluded; and the direft ferocity planted in its place. It feems indeed, that parents felt fome intereft in the fate of their offspring: For Spartan mothers have been applauded for their firmness and magnanimity whilst they rejoiced over their children flain in battle, and pointed with triumph to the mangled bodies. To teach them the cunning and artifice which they might have occafion to practise against the enemy, the Spartans were countenanced by the legislator in thievery. The best thieves were the beft fubjects. The Spartan, indeed, is only to be contemplated in the camp. Eftranged from all the virtues and comforts of domeftic life, he could fcarcely boaft the fidelity or attachment of a female, to foften his military cares! The women of Lacedæmon had neither gentleness nor modefty, nor fenfe of fhame. Such, then, was Sparta: Cruelty and cunning were her cardinal virtues. Yet the claffic fcholar looks back on Sparta with admiration.

The other celebrated city of
Greece

Greece hath a higher claim to our notice. The virtues of Athens were not fo ambiguous or fo revolting. But the Athenians feem to have been as ftrangely addicted to fuperftition as the Spartans were to war. They devoted half their time to the worfhip of the Gods: And the homage that fo occupied their attention, was most abfurd and ridiculous. This, however, is the leaft exceptionable part of a religion, which, by holding forth the molt flagrant examples of immorality in the perfon of the Gods, by exacting a valt variety of fhocking and indecent ceremonies, and by enforcing the practice of obfcenities under the cover of mystery, must have tinctured with impure notlons the best-difpofed minds, and have depraved the moral conduct, in almost every fituation: Where a popular religion enjoins the practice of vice, the vulgar must be neceffarily vitious. And, for the philofophers, could they diffipate from their bofoms the early and familiar prejudices of the only religion which they knew? No fchoolboy, I fuppofe, needs be informed, that the wife and virtuous Socrates (for fuch hath he been called) was weak enough to facrifice a cock to fculapius. Nor is it to be diffembled, that this virtuous man was probably guilty of pæderafty-a crime indifputably fanctioned by most of the fages and poets of Athens.

The influence of polite literature en the morals, is certainly visible in every community: And the fages and poets of Athens were, generally, her best moral men. Thefe, however, were comparatively few. The great body of the people was a contaminated mafs.

Polished, as Athens is faid to have been, fhe was very deficient in that pure refinement which includes chaftity and delicacy. There is one circumftance fufficiently proves it. Her Courtezans were her only women of education. They were abfolutely the only women who were easily approachable by the other fex, who appeared at public places, who adorned and enlivened fociety by their polite addrefs, and fparkling converfation, who prefided over the fashions and influenced the manners. With fuch our Socrates himfelf converfed. With fuch only he could relax the ftern features of philofophy. He had his fweet. Xantippe, indeed at home: But, affable as the was, I am rather inclined to think that he had no great difrelish to an evening-lounge with Thais : tho' the converfation of the latter might be difadvantageously opposed to that of his foft infinuating confort!-The virtuous women of Athens, in truth, were fo miferably degraded, that they were rendered incapable of the fweet communion of foul with foul. Uneducated, grofsly ignorant, fhut up from fociety, they were treated as flaves, and expected to perform the meaneft offices. They had no room to exert their native fenfibility. They had no ideas to communicate: And, if they had, there was no congenial bofom near, to cherish or enliven fentiment, by friendly approbation, and fympathetic affection!

From this fituation of the Athenian women, we can form no very exalted idea of Athens itfelf. 'Tis an undoubted fact, that the domeftic circle, in which the feminine virtues diffufe their fweetnefs, is the finest nurfery of national morality.

[To be concluded in our next.]

OBSERVATIONS ON THE STATE OF THE CLERGY OF

SCOTLAND.

PATRIOTS and friends to mankind would wish to know how to ameli,

orate the condition of every useful clafs of men in the kingdom. With reZ

gard

gard to the people at large, their con- of obtaining it, as the courts of law

dition and circumftances are every day becoming more comfortable and afluent; while thofe of the clergy are every day declining, verging to poverty, and its ufual concomitant, contempt.

"Nil habet infelix pauperies durius in fe, "Quam quod ridiculos homines facit."

We all eafily find out ways and means for the relief of the diftreffed, when we ourselves are well and at our ease. Some will fay, that the clergy fhould return to that plain and homely fare and cloathing, which their predeceffors ufed at the beginning of the century. Not to mention other anfwers to this advice, even to live in that manner now, would coft double of what it did then. The boys in Heriot's Hofpital live upon the fame kind of food, and have the fame kind of cloaths, as they had an hundred years ago; and yet, I fuppofe, it will be found, that the expence of their maintenance and cloathing is now double of what it was then. Others will fay, that the clergy should take farms; not confidering how difficult they are to be got. Befides, where one minister will gain by farming, nineteen in twenty, or rather 99 in 100, would probably lose by it; as they cannot always be at the head of their labouring fervants; nor are they in any way a match for horfe-cowpers, cowcowpers, brewers, and butchers, the people that farmers have to deal with. Gentlemen farmers are on the fame footing as a clergyman would be; and fure I am, that there are not many inftances of their meeting with much fuccefs.

There are two difficulties in the way of applying for an augmentation of ftipends. The certain and almoft unlimited expence of fuch an application, (if the heritors vigorously oppofe the measure, as they often have done,) and the abfolute uncertainty

are vefted with arbitrary powers to give or refufe. "Arbitria judicum pro legibus funt." If it be faid, Is not the victual, of which part of our ftipends often confifts, more valuable in this century than in the laft? I fuppofe if you will pitch upon any 20 years of the last century, and compare them with the 20 correfponding years in this, you will find the difference next to nothing; for befides, that from the improvements in agriculture, by which grain is raised in greater quantities, and has become an article of commerce, it neither rifes fo high, nor falls fo low as formesly.

There feems to be but one way, in which the condition of the clergy can be ameliorated, with the leaft lofs to the public at large, and to the feweft individuals. In Scotland, the tithes of feveral parishes, which belonged to religious houfes, are vefted in the Crown, and are let in leafe for two or three lives; for which the tenant is bound to pay a certain annual fum to the Exchequer. At the firft establishment of the Prefbyterian form of church government here, the bishops rents alfo were vested in the Crown, I have no doubt, from a counter-revolution being not only poffible but probable, and which actually took place. Again at the Revolution, these were in like manner vefted in the Crown, and for the fame reafon; for if King William had been as well affured of the fupport of the Epifcopal clergy, as he was of the Prefbyterian, the form of church government had not been altered at that time. So that thefe unalienated tithes and bishops rents are the patrimony of the church, and feem to have been vefted in the crown as a depofit; for they were never forfeited by rebellion or otherwife; and were lodged there, as a provifion againft an event, which now, by the treaty of union, and the king's coro

« 上一頁繼續 »