was buried in Scotland, and at his funeral the populace raised a riot, almost tore his body from the coffin, and threw dead dogs into the grave along with it. Dr. Arbuthnot wrote his epitaph, and here it is : Here continueth to rot The body of Francis Chartres: Inimitable uniformity of life, In spite of age and infirmities, His matchless impudence from the Nor was he more singular manners, Than successful In accumulating wealth: He was the only person of his time honesty, Retain his primeval meanness When possessed of ten thousand a year: Was at last condemned for what he Oh! indignant reader! Think not his life useless to mankind! To give to after ages A conspicuous proof and example If one does intend to make a verbal assault upon any man, it is well to do so in words which will sting and cut; and assuredly Arbuthnot has succeeded in his laudable intention. The character is justly drawn; and with the change of a very few words, it might correctly be inscribed on the monument of at least one Scotch and one English peer, who have died within the last half-century. There are one or two extreme cases in which it is in good taste, and the effect not without sublimity, to leave a monument with no inscription at all. Of course this can only be when the monument is that of a very great and illustrious man. The pillar erected by Bernadotte at Frederickshall, in memory of Charles the Twelfth, bears not a word; and I believe most people who visit the spot feel that Bernadotte judged well. The rude mass of masonry, standing in the solitary waste, that marks where Howard the philanthropist sleeps, is likewise nameless. And when John Kyrle died in 1724, he was buried in the chancel of the church of Ross in Herefordshire, 'without so much as an inscription.' But the Man of Ross had his best monument in the lifted head and beaming eye of those he left behind him at the mention of his name. He never knew, of course, that the bitter little satirist of Twickenham would melt into unwonted tenderness in telling of all he did, and apologize nobly for his nameless grave: And what! no monument, inscription, stone? Who builds a church to God, and not to fame, The two fine epitaphs written by Ben Jonson are well known. One is on the Countess of Pembroke: Underneath this marble hearse, And the other is the epitaph of a certain unknown Elizabeth: Wouldst thou hear what man can say In a little? —reader, stay. Underneath this stone doth lie If at all she had a fault, One name was Elizabeth, The other let it sleep with death: Fitter, where it died, to tell, Than that it lived at all. Farewell! Most people have heard of the brief epitaph inscribed on a tombstone in the floor of Hereford Cathedral, which inspired one of the sonnets of Wordsworth. There is no name, no date, but the single word MISERRIMUS. The lines, written by herself, which are inscribed on the gravestone of Mrs. Hemans, in St. Anne's Church at Dublin, are very beautiful, but too well known to need quotation. * Pope's Moral Essays. Epistle III. And Longfellow, in his charming little poem of Nuremburg, has preserved the characteristic word in the epitaph of Albert Dürer: Emigravit is the inscription on the tombstone where he lies; Dead he is not, but departed, Perhaps some readers may be interested by the following epitaph, written by no less a man than Sir Walter Scott, and inscribed on the stone which covers the grave of a humble heroine whose name his genius has made known over the world. The grave is in the churchyard of Kirkpatrick-Irongray, a few miles from Dumfries : — This stone was erected By the Author of Waverley Helen Walker Who died in the year of God 1791. practised in real life the virtues with which fiction has invested Jeanie Deans. Refusing the slightest departure even to save the life of a sister, kindness and fortitude by rescuing her from the severity of the law; Respect the grave of poverty when combined with love of truth Although, of course, it is treasonable to say so, I con fess I think this inscription somewhat cumbrous and awkward. The antithesis is not a good one, between the difficulty of Jeanie's 'personal exertions' and the laudableness of the motive which led to them. And there is something not metaphysically correct in the combination described in the closing sentence the combination of poverty, an outward condition, with truthfulness and affection, two inward characteristics. The only parallel phrase which I remember in literature is one which was used by Mr. Stiggins when he was explaining to Sam Weller what was meant by a moral pocket-handkerchief. 'It's them,' were Mr. Stiggins's words, as combines useful instruction with wood-cuts.' Poverty might coexist with, or be associated with, any mental qualities you please, but assuredly it cannot correctly be said to enter into combination with any. As for odd and ridiculous epitaphs, their number is great, and every one has the chief of them at his fingers' ends. I shall be content to give two or three, which I am quite sure hardly any of my readers ever heard of before. The following, which may be read on a tombstone in a country churchyard in Ayrshire, appears to me to be unequalled for irreverence. And let critics observe the skilful introduction of the dialogue form, giving the inscription a dramatic effect: Wha is it that's lying here? Ou aye, but I'm deid noo! The following epitaph was composed by a village poet and wit, not unknown to me in my youth, for a rival poet, one Syme, who had published a volume of verses On the Times (not the newspaper). |