Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction
SAGE, 1996年8月13日 - 264 頁
`This is an admirable book which can be recommended to students with confidence, and is likely also to become an indispensable source of reference for those researching fact construction' - Discourse & Society
How is reality manufactured? The idea of social construction has become a commonplace of much social research, yet precisely what is constructed, and how, and even what constructionism means, is often unclear or taken for granted. In this major work, Jonathan Potter offers a fascinating tour of the central themes raised by these questions.
Representing Reality overviews the different traditions in constructionist thought. Points are illustrated throughout with varied and engaging examples taken from newspaper stories, relationship counselling sessions, accounts of the paranormal, social workers' assessments of violent parents, informal talk between programme makers, political arguments and everyday conversations. Ranging across the social and human sciences, this book provides a lucid introduction to several key strands of work that have overturned the way we think about facts and descriptions, including: the sociology of scientific knowledge; conversation analysis and ethnomethodology; and semiotics, post-structuralism and postmodernism.
第 1 到 5 筆結果，共 80 筆
Holdaway: It's like a fuckin' joke, man. You remember what's important and the
rest you make your own. You can tell ajoke, can't ya? Freddy: I can tell ajoke.
Holdaway: Welljust think about it like that. Now the things you hafta remember
are the ...
The transcribed detail is notjust an empiricist flourish to demonstrate
completeness or conscientiousness or rigour (although it might do those things -
see Bogen, 1992); it is an intrinsic and essential part of the interaction. In addition
, anyone ...
Precursors It is useful to situate what comes next in terms of two of its most
important precursors: John Austin's speech act philosophy in How to Do Things
with Words and Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann's phenomenological
Statements are used to do things. This can be seen as a subclass of one of the
classic problems with speech act theory, that of indirection. Speech act theorists
have struggled to account successfully for one of the most pervasive phenomena
Essentially, it started from a received view of the nature of scientific facts - that
they are impersonal, empirically warranted, rigorously tested - and then asked
what kind of social organization could produce such things. In what has often
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
7 Working Up Representations
8 Criticizing Facts