« 上一页继续 »
& Again it is objected, that the prophecy of Dainety Dan. ii. 44, “ And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed, &c.” implies the erection of a kingdom,origa inal, and new ; and, as this kingdom is acknowledged to be the kingdom of the Messiah, under the latter dis pensation, this kingdom cannot be a continuity of the Israelitish ChurchThis Dr. Baldwin has advanced as an argument against the sameness of the Jewish and Chris. tian Churches. The whole force of the argument depends upon the words set up. If these terms mean, to found originally, there is some plausibility in the argument. But demonstration lies against this interpretation. The whole current of scripture, and facts, in perpetual succession, forbid it. As making a covenant, in scripture phraseology, according to the concession of Dr. Gill, sometimes means, only the renewing, or farther confirming a covenant already established, why may not setting up a kingdom, mean merely, the exaltation, and greater extension ofa kingdom, already in existence ? On consulting the Seventy, I find the original word translated, set up, rendered by them uveoinoei; and Poole renders it suscitabit. Chrysostom renders it into the very same word. (Suscitabit Deus celi regnum.) Schrevellius renders aviolmui, excito; and Williams, in his Concordance, by the English verb, to arise. Neither of these renderings suggests the idea of originating a thing as entirely new. The passage, therefore, exhibits no proof against the theory we have established.
* But Dr. Balwin imagines that there is proof, that Christ did originate a kingdom, as an entirely new
After noting so far, I am astonished to find at the bottom of the page, that **** John was sent to introduce the new dispensation of the Savior." Thus he was to introduce it, and yet baptized under it. So difficult it is to find when this supposed new kingdom began to be. If the advocates of the opinion that an entirely sew kingdom was now set up by Jesus, in the persons of his first followers, and when they were collected as such, will turn to Luke, xxii. 18, they will find, I think, decisive proof that their opinion is erroneous.' " For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God shall come." This was at the institution of the supper, on the very night in which Christ was be. trayed. Yet he speaks of the kingdom of God as to come, a future event. If this phrase means a new kingdom to be originally erected, why then, the kingdom of the Messiah, had not even now an existence. This canstruction must be given up. It involves gross contradictions."
thing, from the fact, which I have introduced to prove the contrary ; viz. that he gathered disciples, and placed himself at the head of them, in distinction froin the body of unbelieving Jews. The question is, What were these disciples anterior to their being thus collected ? Did they belong to the heathen world? Were they not all native Jews ? Were they not of the visible people of God, the Israel whom he loved, and redeemed ? Is there not demonstration that some of them at least, and much reason to conclude, that near. ly all of them, were subjects of real religion? Was not this the case with John and his disciples ? Was it not the case with Joseph, and Mary, and Simeon, and An. na, Zacharias, and Elizabeth? And why should it not be supposed to have been the case with many others ? Some we are told believed in Christ, who did not confess him ; i. e. did not publicly follow him. Now to what society did these persons belong ? Why thc evasion is, that they belonged to the nation of the Jews ; a na. tion, in the civil acceptation of that term. But we have proved that Israel was not a nation, in this sense ; that it was a religious society, of which Christ was the im. mediate head. When he came to his own, he did not come to subjects of a civil government; but to those who stood in visible relation to him by the bonds of the Abrahamic covenant. It is true, as Dr. Baldwin says, that a large proportion of the Jews hated Christ, and - rejected him; that he did not consult their pleasure, or act in concert with them. What then ? Still they were his own, just as hypocrites in the Church are now. 6 He came unto his own ; and his own received him not." They were his subjects; but they proved them. selves to be rebellious subjects, just as a multitude of their fathers had been ; and were cut off accordingly. If they had not been his, he could not have cut them off. All that the Savior did, therefore, in thus separat. ing the holy from the vile, proves, that a kingdom was not now originally formed. Let my brother, and let the reader remember, that the Messiah was to order, and establish forever, a kingdom, already existing. To purge, and purify, and exonerate, in this manner, was to order and establish. But to set up an entirely new kingdom, would be quite a different thing. The principle here contended for, as a matter of fact will be much confirmed as we proceed. I will therefore detain the reader no longer in this place,
Respecting the rejection of the unbelieving part of Israel, and
the translation of the Messiah's kingdom into the Gentile world, in which the union of believing Jews and Gentiles, un.. der his immediate reign, is illustrated,
UNDER the ministration of Christ, we have . seen a part of the Jewish people, following him as their king, and acknowledged by him as the sheep of his fold. In them we have seen his kingdom perpetu. ated, ordered, and established. We have seen another part, and this the largest, hardened in impenitence and unbelief, rising up in rebellion against their own Messi. ah, refusing his claims, and fatally casting him out of the vineyard. We are now to see how these two por. tions of the Jewish people are disposed of. We will begin with the unbelieving part. Upon them, Christ, during his ininistry, fixed uncommon, and as it would seem, with respect to the most of them, unpardonable guilt. “If I had not spoken unto them, they had not had sin ; but now they have no cloak for their sin." Mat. xxiii. 31. “Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which kil. led the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers ; Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can : ye escape the damnation of hell ?”. Upon them especially, must have rested the awful denunciations of their :lawgiver Moses, Deut. xxviii. 6, and on. “ And it shall come to pass that as the Lord rejoiced over you. to do you good, and to multiply you ; so the Lord. will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought, and to pluck you off from the good land, whith, er ye go to possess it. And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from one end of the earth even unte.
(which, s.; so shall which I will as the
the other ; and there thou shalt serye other gods, which neither thou, nor thy fathers have heard, even wood, and stone. And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest; but the Lord shall give thee there, trembling of heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind, &c.” The anterior captivities were but preludes to this awful extirpation. At the close of the prophecy of Isaiah, in connexion with the promise, “For as the new heaven and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain, before me, so shall your seed, and your name remain,” (which, by the way, absolutely secureş the perpetuity of Israel beyond the effects of this extir. pation) it is declared, “ And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcasses of the men, that have transgressed against me, for their worm shall not die, nor shall their fire be quenched. And they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh.” See also Mal. last chapter, Ist verse. The solemn-warning of John the baptist, though it has been already introduced, deserves in this connexion to be noticed. Mat, ii. 7. “ But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees, come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vi. pers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come ? Bring forth, therefore, fruits meet for repentance, And think not to say within yourselves, we have Abraham to our father ; for I say unto you, &c. And now also the ax is laid at the root of the trees. Every tree, therefore, which bringeth not forth good fruit, is hewn down and cast into the fire.” Jesus follows up and confirms these denunciations, as applicable to, and about to be executed upon, those who denied him. He predicts the utter demolition of their temple; the treading down of Jerusalem, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled ; that there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon the people ; that these wicked ene. mies of his, who would not that he should reign over them, after having cast him out of the vineyard, and slain him, shall continue to persecute him in his loy. al subjects, till a final period is put to their visible state,