« 上一頁繼續 »
enter themselves into Nicholas Hart's fraternity. • Could one but lay asleep a few busy heads which I
could name, from the first of November next to the first of May ensuing, I question not but it would very much redound to the quiet of particular persons, as well as to the benefit of the public.
* But to return to Nicholas Hart: I believe, Sir, you • will think it a very extraordinary circumstance for • a man to gain his livelihood by sleeping, and that • rest should procure a man sustenance as well as in•dustry; yet so it is, that Nicholas got last year ( enough to support himself for a twelvemonth. I am
likewise informed that he has this year had a very • comfortable nap. The poets value themselves very 6 much for sleeping on Parnassus, but I never heard • got a groat by it: on the contrary, our friend Ni
cholas gets more by sleeping than he could by work• ing, and may be more properly said, than ever Ho• mer was, to have had golden dreams. Juvenal in
deed mentions a drowsy husband who raised an es« tate by snoring, but then he is represented to have
slept what the common people call a dog's sleep; 6 or if his sleep was real, his wife was awake, and 6 about her business. Your pen, which loves to mo« ralize upon all subjects, may raise something, me
thinks, on this circumstance also, and point out to 6 us those sels of men, who, instead of growing rich s by an honest industry, recommend themselves to • the favours of the great, by making themselves ( agreeable companions in the participations of luxury 6 and pleasure.
! I must farther acquaint you, Sir, that one of the most eminent pens in Grub-street is now employed in writing the dream of this miraculous sleeper,
which I hear will be of a more than ordinary length, 6 as it must contain all the particulars that are sup
posed to have passed in his imagination during so long a sleep. He is said to have gone already through
three days and three nights of it, and to have com • prised in them the most remarkable passages of the • four first empires of the world. If he can keep free • from party strokes, his work may be of use ; but this "I much doubt, having been informed by one of his
friends and confidents, that he has spoken some things of Nimrod with too great freedom.
I am ever, Sir, &c.'
No. CLXXXV. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2.
Tantæne animis cælestibus iræ!
And dwells such fury in celestial breasts !
THERE is nothing in which men more deceive themselves than ia what the world calls zeal. There are so inany pissions which hide themselves ander it, and so many mischiefs arising from it, that some have gone so far as to say it would have been for the benefit of mankind if it had never been reckoned in the catalogue of virtues. It is certain, where it is once laudable and prudential, it is an hundred times criminal and erroneous; nor can it be otherwise, if we con. sider that it operates with equal violence in all religions, however opposite they may be to one another, and in all the subdivisions of each religion in particular.
We are toki by some of the Jewish rabbins, that the first murder was occasioned by a religious controversy ; and if we had the whole history of zeal from the days of Cain to our own tiines, we should see it filled with so many'scenes of slaughter aad bloodshed, as would make a wise man very careful flow he suf
fers himself to be actuated by such a principle, when it only regards matters of opinion and speculation.
I would have every zealous man examine his heart thoroughly, and, I believe, he will often find, that what he calls a zeal for his religion, is either pride, interest, or ill-nature. A man, who differs from another in opinion, sets himself above him in his own judgment, and in several particulars pretends to be the wiser person.
This is a great provocation to the proud man, and gives a very keen edge to what he calls his zeal. And that this is the case very often, we may observe from the behaviour of some of the most zealous for orthodoxy, who have often great friendships and intimacies with vicious immoral men, provided they do but agree with them in the same scheme of belief. The reason is, because the vicious believer gives the precedency to the virtuous man, and allows the good Christian to be the worthier pera son, at the same time that he cannot come up to his perfections. This we find exemplified in that trite passage which we see quoted in almost every system of ethics, though upon another occasion.
I see the right, and I approve it too:
On the contrary, it is certain, if our zeal were true and genuine, we should be much more angry with a sinner than a heretic; since there are several cases which may excuse the latter before his great judge; hut none which can excuse the former.
Interest is likewise a great inflamer, and sets a man on persecution under the colour of zeal. For this reason we find none are so forward to promote the true worship by fire and sworil, as those who find
their present account in it. But I shall extend the word Interest to a larger meaning than what is genees rally given it, as it relates to our spiritual safety and welfare, as well as to our temporal. A man is glad to gain numbers on his side, as they serve to strengthen him in his private opinions. Every proselyte is like a new argument for the establishment of his faith. It makes him believe that his principles carry conviction with them, and are the more likely to be true, when he finds they are conformable to the reason of others, as well as to his own. And that this temper of mind deludes a man very often into an opinion of his zeal, may appear from the common behaviour of the Atheist, who maintains and spreads his opinions with as much heat as those who believe they do it only out of a passion for God's glory.
Ill-nature is another dreadful imitator of zeal. Many a good man may have a natural rancour and malice in his heart, which has been in some measure quelled and subdued by religion; but if it finds any pretence of breaking out, which does not seem to him inconsistent with the duties of a Christian, it throws off all restraint, and rages in its full fury. Zeal is therefore a great ease to a malicious man, by making him believe he does God service, while he is gratifying the.! bent of a perverse revengeful temper. For this reason we find, that most of the massacres and devastations, which have been in the world, have taken their rise from a furious pretended zeal. - I love to see a man zealous in a good matter, and especially when his zeal shews itself for advancing morality, and promoting the happiness of mankind: but when I find the instruments he works with are racks and gibbets, gallies and dungeons; when heimprisons men's persons, confiscates their estates, ruins their families, and burns the body to save the soul, I cannot stick to pronounce of such a ope that (whatever he may
think of his faith and religion) his faith is in vain, and his religion unprofitable.
After having treated of these false zealots in religion, I cannot forbear mentioning a moustrous spe. cies of men, who ere would not think had any existence in nature, were they not to be met with in or dinary conversation, I mean the zealots in Atheism. One would farcy that these men, though they fall short in every other respect, of those who inake a profession of religion, would at least outshine them in this particular, and be exempt from that single fault which seems to grow out of the imprudent fervours of religion: but so it is, that infidelity is propa. gated with as much fierceness and contention, wrath and indignation, as if the safety of mankind depended upon it. There is something so ridiculous and perverse in this kind of zealcts that one does not know how to set them out in their proper colours. They are å sort of gamesters, who are eternally upon the fret, though they play for nothing. They are perpetually teazing their friends to come over to them, though at the same time they allow that neither of them shall get any thing by the bargain. In short, the zeal of spreading Atheism is, if possible, more absurd than Atheism itself.
Since I have mentioned this unaccountable zeal which appears in atheists and infidels, I must farther observe that they are likewise in a most particu. lar manner possessed with the spirit of bigotry. They are wedded to opinions full of contradiction and impossibility, and at the same time look upon the small. est difficulty in an article of faith as a sufficient reason for rejecting it. Notions that f.ll in with the common reason of mankind, that are conformable to the sense of all ages and all nations, not to mention their tendency for promoting the happiness of societies, or particular persons, are exploded as errors and prejus dices; and schemes erected in their stead that are