What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - 257 頁 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 5 筆結果,共 46 筆
... important to be clear about the purpose of such an exercise. All of the participants well understand that simply changing the wording of the Brown opinion in 1954 probably would not have prevented the massive resistance to desegregation ...
... important person in my life. Her generosity, and her love, make any task easy, and any burden light. Jack M. Balkin New Haven, Connecticut July 2000 Part I Brown v. Board of Education A Critical Introduction xii Preface.
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
內容
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |