What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionNYU Press, 2001 - 257 頁 Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
搜尋書籍內容
第 1 到 5 筆結果,共 56 筆
... usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix Preface.
... Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided the same day, was Bolling v. Sharpe. While Brown concerned the states, Bolling concerned racial discrimination by the federal government. Bolling held that although the ...
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
很抱歉,此頁的內容受到限制.
內容
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |