Fresh Or Hot Pursuit: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Government Operations and Metropolitan Affairs of the Committee on the District of Columbia, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 5503 ... August 19, 1982
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia. Subcommittee on Government Operations and Metropolitan Affairs
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 - 136 頁
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
action answer apply arising Arlington County authority award bill brought California cause certainly Chairman Chief citizens City civil claim Code committee compensation concern Congress consent considered Constitution course Dakota damages decision defendant Department determined dissenting District of Columbia doctrine effect eleventh amendment employee exercise express fact Faith and Credit FAUNTRoy federal courts follows foreign Full Faith GRAY Hall hearing held holding hot pursuit HUDSON important individual injuries interest involved issue judgment jurisdiction Justice law enforcement legislation liability limits litigation Maryland matter negligence Nevada operation opinion PARRIs party plaintiff police officer problem protection pursue question reason record REHNQUist require residents respect responsible result rule sister situation sovereign immunity sovereignty state's statute sued suggest suit Supreme Court testimony Thank tion tort understanding United Virginia Wolf
第 123 頁 - It is inherent in the nature of sovereignty not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent. This is the general sense and the general practice of mankind...
第 123 頁 - It is not rational to suppose that the sovereign power should be dragged before a court. The intent is, to enable states to recover claims of individuals residing in other states. I contend this construction is warranted by the words.
第 30 頁 - ... the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. The failure of an agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section.
第 132 頁 - A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a [cause of action] [claim for relief] arising from the person's (1) transacting any business in this state...
第 30 頁 - The head of each Federal agency or his designee, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, may consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise, and settle any claim for money damages against the United States for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the agency while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person,...
第 105 頁 - A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.
第 105 頁 - ... validity from an external source, would imply a diminution of its sovereignty to the extent of the restriction, and an investment of that sovereignty to the same extent in that power which could impose such restriction. All exceptions, therefore, to the full and complete power of a nation within its own territories, must be traced up to the consent of the nation itself. They can flow from no other legitimate source.
第 127 頁 - Nor will you take me to deny that history has weight in the elucidation of the text, though it is surely subtle business to appraise it as a guide. Nor will you even think that I deem precedent without importance, for we...
第 117 頁 - It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized. [The] right finds no explicit mention in the Constitution. The reason, it has been suggested, is that a right so elementary was conceived from the beginning to be a necessary concomitant of the stronger Union the Constitution created. In any event, freedom to travel throughout the United States has long been recognized as a basic right under the Constitution.