 We choose rather to plant ourselves on what we consider impregnable positions. They are these : that a State has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction over all persons and things within its territorial limits as any foreign nation, where that...  Journal of the proceedings - 第 47 頁Oregon. Legislative Assembly. House of Representatives 著 - 1887完整檢視 - 關於此書
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1837 - 696 頁
...of the party to sue. Liringston v. Stury. 351. Rule No. 44, page 5. STATES OF THE UNITED STATES. 1. A state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...within its territorial limits, as any foreign nation: when that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the constitution of the United States. The... | |
 | 1841 - 650 頁
...In the case of New York vs. Miln, the Supreme Court of the United States holds this language ; •' A State has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...restrained by the Constitution of the United States." And again ; — That a State may pass any law " that concerns the welfare of the whole people of a... | |
 | William Alexander Duer - 1843 - 442 頁
...purpose, or where it is clearly incidental to some power expressly given to the National Government. A state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...within its territorial limits, as any foreign nation, when that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the Federal Constitution. The laws of the... | |
 | 1845 - 436 頁
...purpose, or where it is clearly incidental to some power expressly given to the National Government. A state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...within its territorial limits, as any foreign nation, when that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the Federal Constitution. The laws of the... | |
 | E. Fitch Smith - 1848 - 1004 頁
...states from imposing a duty on imported goods. The court placed their decision upon the ground " That a state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...restrained by the constitution of the United States. That by virtue of this, it is not only the right, but the bounden and solemn duty of a state, to advance... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1851 - 642 頁
...goes on to say, we " plant ourselves on what we consider impregnable positions. They are these: That a state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...restrained by the constitution of the United States. That by virtue of this, it is not only the right, but the bounden and solemn duty of a state, to advance... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1895 - 792 頁
...United States, in the case of City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. J39, broadly declared the doctrine that a state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...restrained by the Constitution of the United States; that by virtue of this it is not only the right, but the bounden and solemn duty, of a state, to advance... | |
 | Charles Bishop Goodrich - 1853 - 364 頁
...constitution. The language of the supreme court of the United States has been clear, uniform, and decisive. A state has the same undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction...within its territorial limits as any foreign nation, when that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the constitution of the United States. It... | |
 | Charles Bishop Goodrich - 1853 - 364 頁
...jurisdiction over all persons and things within its territorial limits as any foreign nation, when that jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained by the constitution of the United States. It is not only the right, but the bounden duty of a state to advance the safety, happiness, and prosperity... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1854 - 622 頁
...persons and property. Ibid. • " . ^ 7. Each State, therefore, has the same undeniable and «tolimited jurisdiction over all persons and things within its territorial limits, as any foreign nation, where (jhat jurisdiction is not surrendered or restrained ]?y the Constitution of the United States. Ibid.... | |
| |
