Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 第 107 卷
Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, Benjamin Watkins Leigh, Conway Robinson, Peachy Ridgway Grattan, James Muscoe Matthews, George W. Hansbrough, Martin Parks Burks
D. Bottom, Superintendent of Public Print., 1908
Some vols. also contain reports of cases in the General Court of Virginia.
讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
accused acres action adverse possession Affirmed agent agreement alleged amended appellant appellee apply assessments assignment of error Augusta county authority bills of exception cars cause champerty circuit court circumstances cited claim clause Code commissioners common law commonwealth complainant constitution contract conveyance conveyed counsel court of equity Cramer damages debt deceased declaration decree deed defendant in error delivered the opinion demurrer duty engine entitled evidence executed fact filed grantor Gratt ground held Henrico county husband injury instructs the jury insured intended interest issue John Nettles judge judgment jurisdiction lien ment negligence owner Pamplin City parties payment person plaintiff in error possession proceeding purchase question railroad company reason record recover Reversed Richmond Rockingham county rule Statement statute suit supra testator thereof tion track trial court trustees verdict Virginia wife Wise county witness writ of error
第 749 頁 - But there is another proposition equally well established, and it is a qualification upon the first, namely: that though the plaintiff may have been guilty of negligence, and although that negligence may, in fact, have contributed to the accident, yet if the defendant could in the result, by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence, have avoided the mischief which happened, the plaintiff's negligence will not excuse him.
第 708 頁 - ... if any change other than by the death of an insured, take place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard) whether by legal process or judgment or by voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise...
第 640 頁 - The duty of this court, as of every other judicial tribunal, is to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not to give opinions upon moot questions or abstract propositions, or to declare principles or rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue in the case before it.
第 589 頁 - In other words, as the rule is now more briefly expressed, "parol contemporaneous evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary the terms of a valid written instrument.
第 223 頁 - All laws now in force in the territory of Washington, which are not repugnant to this constitution, shall remain in force until they expire by their own limitation, or are altered or repealed by the legislature...
第 398 頁 - Fellows, and to their heirs and assigns, all that tract or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the county of...
第 915 頁 - Property does become clothed with a public interest when used in a manner to make it of public consequence and affect the community at large. When, therefore, one devotes his property to a use in which the public has an interest, he, in effect, grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the interest he has thus created.
第 635 頁 - The rule of law upon this subject appears to be that, except where the Constitution has imposed limits upon the legislative power, It must be considered as practically absolute, whether it operate according to natural justice or not in any parr ticular case.
第 958 頁 - No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...
第 666 頁 - ... in the District of Columbia the right of any married woman to any property, personal or real, belonging to her at the time of marriage, or acquired during marriage in any other way than by gift or conveyance from her husband, shall be as absolute as if she were feme sole, and shall not be subject to the disposal of her husband, nor be liable for his debts...