網頁圖片
PDF
ePub 版

ORDERS FOR MAY 6 THROUGH

JUNE 17, 1992

MAY 6, 1992 Certiorari Denied

No. 91–7832 (A-783). May v. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE SCALIA, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 955 F. 2d 299.

No. 91–8166 (A-823). MAY v. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE SCALIA, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 74.

MAY 7, 1992 Dismissal Under Rule 46

No. 91–980. COLORADO ET AL. v. KUHN ET AL. Sup. Ct. Colo. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46. Reported below: 817 P. 2d 101. Miscellaneous Orders

No. A-824. HILL V. LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE BLACKMUN, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

No. A-824. HILL V. LOCKHART, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. Motion to reconsider order of May 7, 1992, denying application for stay of execution denied.

MAY 11, 1992 Miscellaneous Order

No. A-838. MARTIN V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Application for stay of execution

901

May 11, 13, 15, 18, 1992

504 U. S.

of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE KENNEDY, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Certiorari Denied

No. 91–8190 (A-835). MARTIN V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE KENNEDY, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 599 So. 2d 119.

MAY 13, 1992 Miscellaneous Order

No. A-829. GANTT ET AL. v. SKELOS ET AL. Application to stay an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, presented to JUSTICE THOMAS, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and it is ordered that the portion of the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, case Nos. CV-92–1521 (SJ) and CV-92– 1776 (SJ), entered May 5, 1992, enjoining further proceedings in Reid v. Marino, Index No. 9567/92, now pending in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Kings, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court. Further consideration of motion to expedite is deferred to timely filing of a statement as to jurisdiction in the above-entitled appeal.

MAY 15, 1992 Dismissal Under Rule 46

No. 91–7963. IN RE DEMPSEY. Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.

MAY 18, 1992 Affirmed on Appeal

No. 91–1553. CAMP, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ALABAMA V. WESCH ET AL. Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ala. Reported below: 785 F. Supp. 1491. Certiorari GrantedVacated and Remanded

No. 91-169. LUJAN, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. V. SIERRA CLUB ET AL. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judg

[blocks in formation]

ment vacated, and case rem jed for further consideration in light of Department of Energy v. Ohio, 503 U. S. 607 (1992). Reported below: 931 F. 2d 1421.

No. 91–1475. FLORIDA v. WALKER. Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 5th Dist. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U. S. 171 (1991). Reported below: 573 So. 2d 415. Miscellaneous Orders No.

HAUGH ET AL. v. BULLIS SCHOOL, INC. Motion for reconsideration of denial of leave to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time [503 U. S. 931] denied.

No. A-693 (91–1618). VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL. v. QUILTER, SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE OF OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ET AL. Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Motion of appellees to dismiss this Court's stay order of April 20, 1992 [503 U. S. 979), denied.

No. A-797. TRINSEY V. VALENTI ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE THOMAS and referred to the Court, denied.

No. A-821. GONZALEZ v. WILKEY, SPECIAL COUNSEL. D. C. D. C. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE BLACKMUN and referred to the Court, denied.

No. D-1086. IN RE DISBARMENT OF Nuzzo. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 503 U. S. 902.]

No. D-1104. IN RE DISBARMENT OF BLANK. Gary L. Blank, of Chicago, Ill., having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The rule to show cause, heretofore issued on March 30, 1992 [503 U. S. 956], is hereby discharged.

No. D-1105. IN RE DISBARMENT OF MEKAS. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 503 U. S. 956.]

No. D-1117. ÎN RE DISBARMENT OF HUGHES. It is ordered that Stephen D. Hughes, of Dunedin, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable

[blocks in formation]

within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1118. IN RE DISBARMENT OF PLAIA. It is ordered that Alan A. Plaia, of Newport Beach, Cal., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1119. IN RE DISBARMENT OF O'HARA. It is ordered that James F. O'Hara, of Little Rock, Ark., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1120. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SEGERS. It is ordered that Joseph Wm. Segers, Jr., of Fort Worth, Tex., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1121. IN RE DISBARMENT OF RAGANO. It is ordered that Frank Ragano, of Tampa, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1122. IN RE DISBARMENT OF BALES. It is ordered that Lester Bales, of Zephyrhills, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1123. IN RE DISBARMENT OF HOUCK. It is ordered that William Jerome Houck, of Hickory, N. C., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1124. IN RE DISBARMENT OF GLUBIN. It is ordered that Bruce Allan Glubin, of Lynbrook, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

[blocks in formation]

No. D-1125. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SCHULZ. It is ordered that Richard C. Schulz, of Bay Shore, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. 108, Orig. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING ET AL. Second Interim Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions to this Report and the first Interim Report of the Special Master, with supporting briefs, may be filed by the parties within 45 days. Replies thereto, if any, may be filed within 30 days. The amici curiae may file exceptions and replies within the time allowed the parties. Further consideration of motion of Nebraska for leave to file an amended petition deferred to consideration of the exceptions and replies. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 503 U. S. 981.]

No. 119, Orig. CONNECTICUT ET AL. V. NEW HAMPSHIRE. Motions of Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel and United Illuminating Co. et al. for leave to intervene referred to the Special Master. JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions. (For earlier order herein, see, e.g., 503 U. S. 1002.]

No. 87-746. MICHAEL H. ET AL. v. GERALD D., 491 U. S. 110. Motion of appellants to recall and amend or, in the alternative, to clarify judgment of this Court denied. JUSTICE SOUTER and JUSTICE THOMAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

No. 91–321. ITEL CONTAINERS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. HUDDLESTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF TENNESSEE. Sup. Ct. Tenn. (Certiorari granted, 502 U. S. 1090.) Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of Institute of International Container Lessors et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for argument denied.

No. 91–719. PARKE, WARDEN V. RALEY. C. A. 6th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

« 上一頁繼續 »