...exceptions. State v. Jaggers, 71 2V. JL 281, 283. It is further argued that at the close of the whole case the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, pursuant to an application for such a direction made in his behalf. Whether the court is...

...terms that it was not susceptible of explanation by parol evidence. Then, as now, the defendant urged that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, but the court said the questions involved were for the determination of the jury, under...

...should not have credit for it twice. It is not necessary to consider the other assignments of error. The trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the judgment and costs in the former case, with interest. Judgment is reversed,...

...unusually wide car for the operation. 2. SAME — ASSUMED RISK — PERSONAL INJURIES — WIDTH OF CARS. The trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant company on the ground of contributory negligence of the plaintiff when it appeared that he...

...below, and in view of the holding in the case of Buhl v. Union Depot Co., supra, we are of opinion that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of defendant. A verdict, however, was directed in favor of plaintiff for nominal damages. Inasmuch as...

...to remedy the defects after he knew of the defective condition of said saw and its appliances, and that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the appellant. The judgments of the Appellate and circuit courts will be reversed and the cause remanded...

...were assigned in the trial of this case in the common pleas, the one chiefly urged, however, being that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant upon the ground that there was no evidence showing any negligence on the part of the motorman...

...Ct. 438, 61 Iv. Ed. 836. [4] It is, however, further contended on behalf of the plaintiff in error that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in error on the ground that there was no evidence tending to show that he formed any scheme...

...283, 58 Atl. 1014, 108 Am. St. Rep. 746. [5] It is further argued that at the close of the whole case the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, pursuant to an application for such a direction made in his behalf. Whether the court Is...

...negligence of appellant in failing to restrain Bridges, or to eject him from the train. We therefore conclude that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of defendant. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with directions for new trial consistent with this...