Hearings, Reports and Prints of Joint Committee on Congressional OperationsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 |
其他版本 - 查看全部
常見字詞
alleged Amendment Annunzio appellee Attorney authority branch Brewster bribe Byrd Amendment Capitol Circuit Civil Action claim Committee To Stop complaint conduct Cong Congressional District Constitution Court of Appeals criminal Debate Clause decision defendant defendant's Department determine dismiss District of Columbia election exclusionary rule Executive fact federal filed franked mail franking privilege function Government grand jury hearing held House immunity indictment inquiry issue Johnson Judge judgment judicial judiciary jurisdiction Justice Kilbourn Laird Reservists Committee lative legislative acts matter McSurelys Members of Congress ment Mike Gravel motion official business opinion Pentagon Papers performance persons plaintiffs political question postal patron Powell President proceedings prosecution protected provides purpose Representatives Rodberg rule Secretary separation of powers Speech and Debate Speech or Debate statute statutory Subcommittee subpoena Supp Supreme Court Three Sisters Bridge tion tive trial U.S. District Court United violation Volpe vote
熱門章節
第 329 頁 - That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.
第 450 頁 - The doctrine of the separation of powers was adopted by the Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy.
第 400 頁 - Prominent on the surface of any case held to involve a political question is found a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department; or a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it; or the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion...
第 329 頁 - Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court, or place out of Congress...
第 100 頁 - If we advert to the nature of Republican Government, we shall find that the censorial power is in the people over the Government, and not in the Government over the people.
第 426 頁 - But even if courts could require full disclosure, the very nature of executive decisions as to foreign policy is political, not judicial. Such decisions are wholly confided by our Constitution to the political departments of the government, Executive and Legislative.
第 634 頁 - The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them. It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.
第 281 頁 - NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Lumber Co., 200 US 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA ET AL.
第 82 頁 - ... any person who will be adversely affected by such order when it is effective may at any time prior to the sixtieth day after such order is issued file a petition with the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, for a judicial review of such order.
第 438 頁 - When the President acts in absence of either a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have concurrent authority, or in which its distribution is uncertain.