 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1976 - 602 頁
...considerations, the constitutional right recognized and protected by the Court's abortion decisions is the "right of the individual, married or single,...person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 US 438, 453 (1972). BRENNAN, J., dissenting 432U.S. availability of... | |
 | United States. Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse - 1972 - 660 頁
...own, but an association of two individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional make-up. If the right of privacy means anything, it is the...person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." USLW at 4308 (citations omitted). Justices White and Blackmun concurred in the result They... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1973 - 780 頁
...GUARANTEES First, fertility control enjoys specific constitutional protection. The Supreme Court has stated, "If the right of privacy means anything, it is the...person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." г In our society today, the means through which fertility can best be regulated are medical... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1974 - 1040 頁
...Oklahoma, 316 US 535, 541. As recently as last Term, in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 US 438, 453, we recognized "the right of the individual, married or single, to...intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person STEWART, J., concurring 410 US as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." That right necessarily... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1975 - 954 頁
...Olmstead v. United States, 277 US 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting). It is similarly related to "the right of the individual, married or single, to...person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child" (italics omitted), Eisemtadt v. Baird, 405 US 438, 453 (1972), and the right to exercise "autonomous... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1975 - 1308 頁
...Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 US 535. As we noted in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 US 438, 453, there is a right "to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion...person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child." By acting to penalize the pregnant teacher for deciding to bear a child, overly restrictive... | |
| |
If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child. 
